CongratsI don't know if anyone has noticed but alot if not most of the options in the "discussing your ideas" came from me passing on ideas from our community. I don't know about you all but I am happy and a little proud.
Nick and Julia have an open relationship, i can't see problem here, i think Nick like threesome orgy with Max Kate Julia Alice etcYou must be registered to see the links
If you've played 0.29 Part 1, you've noticed some things went a bit different from the Kate storyline. None of them were big (one of the biggest ones was Kate not throwing away the camera she's found), but there were some small things here and there.
In 0.29 Part 2, however, there's a pretty big distinction between the playthroughs. In Max's timeline, Julia has broken up with Nick soon after he brought the toys in the basement. We got Nick out of the way for players who want Max to have relationships with Kate and Julia.
And now that we've done that, we think maybe we should have asked your opinion first
So, do you think some differences between the timelines could be a nice surprise to keep you on your toes, or would you rather have things to stay the same as much as possible? Technically, Julia and Nick broke up before Max even met Kate, so he couldn't possibly affect their relationship in any way. But removing Nick does make things easier for Max.
We don't plan on having any major differences in the main storyline, all differences will be minor and relatively insignificant. If we ever decide to make a major difference, we're going to learn from today and make a poll first
If you've played 0.29 Part 1, you've noticed some things went a bit different from the Kate storyline. None of them were big (one of the biggest ones was Kate not throwing away the camera she's found), but there were some small things here and there.
In 0.29 Part 2, however, there's a pretty big distinction between the playthroughs. In Max's timeline, Julia has broken up with Nick soon after he brought the toys in the basement. We got Nick out of the way for players who want Max to have relationships with Kate and Julia.
And now that we've done that, we think maybe we should have asked your opinion first
So, do you think some differences between the timelines could be a nice surprise to keep you on your toes, or would you rather have things to stay the same as much as possible? Technically, Julia and Nick broke up before Max even met Kate, so he couldn't possibly affect their relationship in any way. But removing Nick does make things easier for Max.
We don't plan on having any major differences in the main storyline, all differences will be minor and relatively insignificant. If we ever decide to make a major difference, we're going to learn from today and make a poll first
Timelines should be as close to each other as possible
16%
Variety is the spice of life
84%
are all these on the offline 0.29?? i think i end this version and dont even met the events u say..where are those?Nick and Julia have an open relationship, i can't see problem here, i think Nick like threesome orgy with Max Kate Julia Alice etc
isn't new event but possible future eventare all these on the offline 0.29?? i think i end this version and dont even met the events u say..where are those?
Talk with her after midnightI am stuck at this. I watched porn with her once but now when talking with her the option isn't there anymore.You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
I said something to this effect on the postNick and Julia have an open relationship, i can't see problem here, i think Nick like threesome orgy with Max Kate Julia Alice etc
meh, I have issues with having to click through repeat events just to get through them but there are things I would like to see more than that namely anything to do with Lisa. She is the only reason I play this game.Excellent! I was just going to ask this. I voted in the other poll.
(BTW, I think/hope #46 tops everyone's preferences.)
.29 does seem to use the folders from .28 but some are having trouble with them showing in game.Do old saves work? So can i use save from 0.28 in 0.29? I don't see anything new...
The idea of #11 is interesting. Kira and Julia conspiring.I just realized I botched the link for the poll ranking fixed it in my post but here is is againYou must be registered to see the links
I am a $5 subscriber. I can't afford anymore after being laid off for about 3 months and only working part time now.Content polls are important, but they do not answer the most important question: how to motivate game authors to create more content within a reasonable time frame. Glamor has been developing for 2.5 years, DS has its own rhythm of work, the number of patrons remains stable and there is no point in changing something from the developers to create more content.
I propose to conduct a survey about the subscription to Patreon. The point of the survey is to ask the developers if they are willing to spend more time developing Glamor if more subscribers appear or if subscribers sign up for a more expensive subscription. I also propose to some of the subscribers for $ 20-40 to offer DS to conduct this survey publicly on patreon. For example Ayrik Eyronphist could do it.
Questions:
1. I sometimes subscribe for $ 5-10, and I'm ready to pay when a big update comes out
2. I am a 5 $ subscriber and am not ready to spend more
3. I am a $ 5 subscriber and am willing to spend more for a larger update
4. I am a 10 $ subscriber and am not ready to spend more
5. I am a 10 $ subscriber and am willing to spend more for a larger update
6. I am a 20 $ subscriber and am not ready to spend more
7. I am a $ 20 subscriber and am willing to spend more for a larger update
8. I am an old pirate and do not know the words of the license agreement (this question is only for this forum)
Based on the survey results, it will be possible to find out if subscribers and developers can build a dialogue in this way.
DS doesn't really communicate with the community especially if it touches a topic that is inconvenient for him. He took a couple of months to answer one guys question after he copy and pasted it on every post DS made.Content polls are important, but they do not answer the most important question: how to motivate game authors to create more content within a reasonable time frame. Glamor has been developing for 2.5 years, DS has its own rhythm of work, the number of patrons remains stable and there is no point in changing something from the developers to create more content.
I propose to conduct a survey about the subscription to Patreon. The point of the survey is to ask the developers if they are willing to spend more time developing Glamor if more subscribers appear or if subscribers sign up for a more expensive subscription. I also propose to some of the subscribers for $ 20-40 to offer DS to conduct this survey publicly on patreon. For example Ayrik Eyronphist could do it.
Questions:
1. I sometimes subscribe for $ 5-10, and I'm ready to pay when a big update comes out
2. I am a 5 $ subscriber and am not ready to spend more
3. I am a $ 5 subscriber and am willing to spend more for a larger update
4. I am a 10 $ subscriber and am not ready to spend more
5. I am a 10 $ subscriber and am willing to spend more for a larger update
6. I am a 20 $ subscriber and am not ready to spend more
7. I am a $ 20 subscriber and am willing to spend more for a larger update
8. I am an old pirate and do not know the words of the license agreement (this question is only for this forum)
Based on the survey results, it will be possible to find out if subscribers and developers can build a dialogue in this way.
I 've also noticed that DS ignores some "interesting" questions. But now he said that he will communicate more with the community and conducts a lot of surveys. My suggestion may be too provocative for DS but who knows what might come out of it.DS doesn't really communicate with the community especially if it touches a topic that is inconvenient for him. He took a couple of months to answer one guys question after he copy and pasted it on every post DS made.