- Jan 16, 2019
- 1,476
- 928
OK .. you don't wanna stop.. we go on then ..
- you say: "You asked if there was anything new for Kate in 0.36. You were told no, because it was a Max update and that means no new Kate content."
That is exactly what I was NOT TOLD. If I was told "no" I would have had an answer and this whole discussion wouldn't be necessary. But I was NOT told "no" I was told to read the OP which I already did before and on the OP there is no sentence saying "there is no Kate content in this update". I could of course GUESS or "assume" that there is no Kate but I wanted to be sure in order to not lose time playing for content that doesn't exist. And that's why I asked.
- you say: "You made the assertion that despite the changelog never mentioning anything for Kate, that there must be because of DS's use of (again) "biggest update"
Not mentioning something, doesn't mean that that something doesn't exist. And I never said it MUST BE but it MAY BE , (because it WAS the case before and because something called "biggest update" could, or even should be a little bigger than what we can see on only the Max route in this update)
- you say: "which is nothing short of either stupidity on your part, or deliberate trolling"
My IQ is 130. What's yours?
- you say: "You were also told that updates focus on one of them each time, never both, which you disagreed with."
Your above statement (apart from not being an answer to my original question but a comment to a comment made by me later) is NOT TRUE! Ever heard of NEVER SAY NEVER? There WERE cases when both routes were in the same update. "Never" means something else.. Not the case in the last 2 updates but there were others before with both routes inside! And something that has been, can be again. Which is why forums exist, to ask questions and to get answers on them not to be called names for asking.
- you say: "The ratio of updates between Kate and Max is an entirely separate thing from what you asked and what you disagreed with."
If it's a "separate thing", how comes that thing should answer my question?
And what i "disagreed with" (not inside my question but later, as a comment to a comment) was the ratio of 1/1 because as I explained above, that was NOT ALWAYS SO! And claiming that it was NEVER different is NOT TRUE!
- you say: "The closest you can get to make an assertion that both received updates at the same time, was the change of engine, which is an extreme technicality that's only of use as trolling. Not for pedantry, just for trolling."
Again WRONG: the "closest I can get" is the FACTS (there were NOT ALWAYS either 1 Kate or 1 Max but sometimes also mixed), not the change of engine, of which I have no idea and about which I never asked. But about which you seem to be "trolling", probably trying to show again how "knowledgeable" you are.
Short said: as long as somebody keeps trying to switch my words or to accuse me of things that I didn't do, i will HAVE TO keep answering. Because I do not accept that!
In fact what you accuse me of is "not assuming" that this update should be 1 route only, based on the fact that other (BUT NOT ALL) updates were 1 route only. Sorry but i do not like to assume or to guess.. I want to KNOW FOR SURE. And when i don't know for sure, I ask!
But with people like you it makes no sense to ask because what you answer is: "hey you idiot, can't you just assume what we assume?" My answer is: NOPE!
