- May 1, 2018
- 2,389
- 6,817
The rape was relieved in September (or August?), not October which was the reveal of Sandra's mom. He also started doing cross promotions October 5th, likely leading to the huge spike October 9th which doesn't fit the past graphs at all. The truth is the graph isn't raw data either. There's no number of patrons that dropped the game that day compared to the number that signed on, just the change in overall patrons. Please explain to me how the graph proves people didn't drop the game when it's pretty clear Viit found a new audience.You must be registered to see the links
It's very easily proven. Look at the 6m graph. The allegedly problematic content was in October. Patronage went way up. The data doesn't lie.
Sure, but you're saying "player's didn't drop the game" when you mean patrons, but we don't even know that as I just pointed out. As Bauman pointed out, sometimes pirates become patrons as well.Did pirates drop the game? I dunno. But who really cares about people stealing content?