D
Deleted member 1191611
Guest
Guest
No update from Dev
Hi
I'll keep this short. The update will be released on Friday. We'll finish preparing the last of the renders today. But actually rendering the animations is taking a bit longer than we thought. So, just to be safe we're putting the official release date for Friday. Quite late in the day, since it's a work day, but it should be all done by then.
Viit
Hi
Doing post work on the renders now. I still have some RL work to do, but I hope to be done with post by tonight, and that there aren't any issues.
This is the biggest update we've ever done for Haley in terms of renders.
Including animations it gets to the 750 renders mark. While our usual ones are around 350-400.
That's why we're struggling a bit.
But we hope to get it all done tonight. Fingers crossed.
Thank you for your patience
It's not what we call it, it's what the law calls it.Maybe I'm way out of line here, but if in my personal life I'd get knowledge of a 15 year old having consensual sex with an adult I wouldnt make a big deal out of it, and I certainly wouldnt call it rape
It didn't change the game per se, it changed how people view 1 character in it.Comparing it to what happened in AL doesnt make any sense to me, because the change the incident had for that game was on a different level.
Someone asked to drop the conversation so this is probably the last I'm gonna say about it.It's not what we call it, it's what the law calls it.
He was in a position of power over a student which, by law, is statutory rape.
Haley is introduced into the game with a present boyfriend and then proceeds to talk about how he doesnt perform that well sexually, I'd say theres no basis to expect her to be sexually inexperienced at all. If anything at that point I'd expect her to have a variety of different partners to compare him with.If a girl aint a virgin they have problems.
Sandra does explain why she makes us wait, she had a bad experience with a previous lover and rushed the sex aspect. Now she waits.I find more reasons to expect Sandra to be less experienced based on how she doesnt let anybody touch her forever.
Maybe S. can do the math. How many total posts have there been since my post and how many of those posts were generated by my post? This discussion was dead, now it's alive. You must have cared since you bothered to reply. The way you show that you don't care is by ignoring the post. Obviously my post was not ignored. So apparently people cared, they did not agree.It certainly didn't cause a big enough issue that i'd need to leave and keep coming back to voice an opinion hardly anyone gives a toads testicle about.
It also means that some people don't want to waste any more time responding to nonsense than they already have.A. to me a facepalm means I don't agree but can't make a coherent argument about why I disagree.
For me it is, and the main reason is that Klaus is/was her teacher. And I am not taking the "it's illegal so it's bad" approach, although that is also true, but I actually do share the reasoning behind it being illegal.At that point it becomes a conversation about how we personally view and judge the situation, and on a personal level for me I don't think it would make a huge difference whether she had sex with her teacher or her neighbor or just some random guy she met on the internet. It's more about whether she is developed enough to give her consent (which at the age of 15 she most likely was) and then theres an ick-factor based on how big the age difference is, which probably isnt even justified. So while I'd say legally it wasn't ok what he did, I wouldn't personally condemn him for it or anything like that, especially not without knowing more details about the situation.
For me it would be interesting to know whether other ppl think the outrage of MC is justified, and, if yes, whether the main reason is that Klaus was her teacher, or whether there are other reasons.
There's a small error in your reasoning: this is not a discussion nor a conversation further than that this is an exchange of words. When you go to a metal concert and scream over the music that "metal sucks" and people tell you in more or less polite terms to STFU, that is not a discussion. You are just being a nuisance hindering others enjoying what they like. You are free to voice your opinion, sure, you may review and rate the game, that will be included in the general overview new players may get. But this already goes beyond that: you've apparently voiced your opinion, it was discussed, and everybody decided for themselves what they thought. Restarting an issue that has been settled without any new reason to do so is not having a discussion, it is the equivalent of a toddler screaming "Am not!" "Am not!" "Am not!" "You're so mean!"Maybe S. can do the math. How many total posts have there been since my post and how many of those posts were generated by my post? This discussion was dead, now it's alive. You must have cared since you bothered to reply. The way you show that you don't care is by ignoring the post. Obviously my post was not ignored. So apparently people cared, they did not agree.
That "something" is cross promotion.Take a look at Grapheon, the game has been growing since the Klaus reveal. So yeah, they must be doing something right.
The game has been growing since before cross promotion was a thing.You guys are getting close to only discussing rape.
That "something" is cross promotion.
It certainly was, most games do, but I'm not sure how this has any relevancy to your point though. All the major recent growth you can see on graphtreon is tied directly to the cross promos. Besides January of couse, I imagine a lot of people dropped pledges for Christmas and came back that month.The game has been growing since before cross promotion was a thing.
My point is that the Klauss thing didn't hurt their revenue in the least. Yeah, some people complained here and there were cries, but in their Patreon there was apparently no damage at all.It certainly was, most games do, but I'm not sure how this has any relevancy to your point though. All the major recent growth you can see on graphtreon is tied directly to the cross promos. Besides January of couse, I imagine a lot of people dropped pledges for Christmas and came back that month.
Yes, because of cross promotion. We have no idea how favorably or negatively Klaus would affect the game because they completely undercut it with the cross promos. Hell of a great business decision on their part, I'll give them that.their Patreon there was apparently no damage at all.
Oh, I did, I don't post here at all hardly.So why are we still talking about it here months after? Just move on if you dislike the story.