I'll try to go in parts.
"Actually, the one that is doing that is you. You can phrase is as complex as you want, but I explained your argument as it is. And here is a quote, from you, saying exactly what your argument is. Because it is porn, it should be simple. That follows by definition. "
In the quote you presented I said " At the end of the day, it's porn. I think people tend to forget that, acting like this is some novel that must be super deep and intellectual. ". Read it again and again. Where in that statement do I say what you atribute to be my opinion? You claimed that my opinion was:
"But your comment was "I believe this is a porn story, so I don't think there is need for anything like that". That is what you said my opinion was. And the quote you presented in which I "affirmed that opinion" I was saying "at the end of the day this is porn, people tend to forget that and act like this needs to be super deep." How are these two phrases even remotely similar? I literally never said "Because it's porn, it should be simple". I said "because it's porn, people don't need to act like it needs to be complex". Completely different.
This shows you are misinterpetting on purpose what I distinctly wrote in order to present my opinion incorrectly.
" My point was telling you that your opinion is precisely not truth so no, these are not necessarily simple porn stories " → My opinion is not truth? How can an opinion even be the truth. That phrase in itself is so moronic I don't even know what you were even implying with it.
" I agree with this statement, although I have never said never suggested it. " → I shall demonstrate how you made it look like you had this opinion in a simplified form of this argument you made: "Because Acting Lessons was a good complex AVN, these aren't simple porn stories".
You said that here: "My point was telling you that your opinion is precisely not truth so no, these are not necessarily simple porn stories (even if as I said I agree with you about your statement about Haley). In fact, if you have not, I strongly recommend you to read Acting Lessons. You will see that there is more to the story than simple porn "
Just because one game was complex and good, other do not need to be complex to be good nor does attempting to turn them complex in the middle make them good.
"First and foremost, there was not mission statement" → Yes, you are correct there never is a literal mission statement. English is not my first language so I literally do not know how the best expression to say what I meant with this. It's not a literal mission statement, more like "the idea that spawned the game and brought life to it and it's development". Not "respecting a literal mission statement". But respecting what they tried to do with the game. They made a simple game with a simple setting and simple premise and suddenly they changed it.
You can talk about "genre shift", and how it adds value to certain movies and books. This isn't what I'm talking about, I'm talking about mood, setting, feel of the story. If The Lord of the Rings turned into the Wizard of Oz or the Muppets during the Two Towers, it would be a genre shift... But it wouldn't add value to the story, would it?
I understand you will never agree with me because you feel like stories should always be allowed to change in the middle. I argue they should change for the better, not for the worse, and if they change the story shouldn't do a completely 180º.