Dude I don't know why you're spewing that bs schpeel here but it's clearly more based on you trying to find anything to say instead of actually arguing the point. No one's saying he should be a "junkyard dog" and attack everything but REAL men know that there's a time when they should step in to do something. REAL people in general grasp the concept that action=change and inaction=general misfortune. He's no kind of leader or anything and maybe simp or cuck is a strong descriptor but lemme ask this-can you argue it? Can you actually refute it with evidence and an argument? Or can you just give a generalized, poorly articulated monologue on the benefits of overt pacifism in some misguided attempt to look cool?
Literally read what I wrote. The implication with everything we have almost irrefutably says grandpa did stuff with her in the past.
That "bs" being "spewed" by me wasn't based on me "trying to find anything to say" but on REAL hard men I have known. I grew up in a pretty tough REAL place, so I've known a fair number. (I wasn't one of them....not even close...but I'm very familiar with the atmosphere of pending, or potential violence that goes with being a citizen in some places, teenaged or adult). So, you're in a car with a 'wall of muscle' for a driver, ask yourself how much do you think you could get away with? If the car doors are locked, there's no escape if that driver decides to stop, get out & come round to your side with the keys. Being incapacitated at this point wouldn't be much of help but at least you've had your say....& that's important at this juncture? Saying nothing at all would be a better option & it's not like he's running away, especially not in a moving car. If that's being a pacifist, sign me up.
I never said this MC was a leader. That was just a general point. At this stage he's more of an influencer, which doesn't mean he's completely switched on to all eventualities, all the time....who is? How many times do ordinary everyday people think, "I should have said...", when it's already too late, after the event. He, however, doesn't have anything to prove because he's already intervened when it was necessary at the garage & his housemates know this. He doesn't need to argue fruitlessly in order to show what a good friend he can be.
At the mansion the MC is in unfamiliar surroundings & doesn't know all those present. His behaviour doesn't seem to be inadequate to me. He shows maturity in being restrained.
I see that 'literary critic' is part of your portfolio, or perhaps you're an English teacher? If you are, accept my apologies, as I bow to your greater erudition. Next time I really should plan ahead before I contribute to the discussion, rather than spontaneously writing what's on my mind, otherwise I might produce another, "generalized, poorly articulated monologue." I will agree on one aspect of that critique, which is that it was a "monologue." It was written in response to the growing chorus of disapproval of Chapter 8, which, as you might guess, I enjoyed.
As for the granpa 'thing,' check my prevous comments.