The sentence is still correct, you just removed the most important part so that it would better fit your fallacious logic. And then, you dare state that I am the one arguing about semantics. Whatever, I have better to do than argue with your pathetic bickering about phrasing, so, let's go to the facts :
Patreon is not a shop. Creators don't have any obligation to hold any promise. You are not pre-ordering anything by being a patron, and it is pretty obvious when you set up a subscription. That's why Patreon's policy that considers you should only cancel your sub if you don't get what you expected is totally fair. Patrons who expect the opposite are just idiots that feel they have any contractual right about the creator's work.
You gave a misleading comparison this with a charity scam, which is not surprising coming from you, seing how you argue. In a charity context, there are some legal and moral obligations about where the money is going. If the organisation leaders keep the money to themselves and get caught red-handed, it is a scam. When you are supporting a creator, there is no obligation for the money to be all spent for the creation context. Patreon rules do not even require the artist to provide anything. I will not even start talking about the part that you dishonestly removed, which is the fact that most support on Patreon (or any other platform) is a form of remuneration for a work that an artist already delivered.
In Komisari's case, he already did a lot, initially, and even though he is producing very little since then (sneak peaks here and there), the supporters are well aware of the situation, so calling it a scam is just a joke.
And don't misunderstand my point here, I am not at all defending Komisari, quite the opposite, he is just a lazy bastard, liar and incompetent delusional procrastinator, but it's his right. I just can't stand those crybarby debates about scamming. Not happy ? STOP SUPPORTING. Not supporting ? Then shut it and go find something better to do
