VN Ren'Py Abandoned I Scream [Ch. 1] [FunDi]

[RodrigoOSan]

Maybe because the guy was also complaining about the rape tag. Then proceeds to want incest instead. The problem here is users on this forum constantly trying to talk devs into making everything into an incest game and talking them out of other tags.

Little boy going around sleep sexing all his sisters and mother and perving over them all game is cool. Rape? Mind Control? Oh no! We can't have that in a fictional world. I just want to make digital genetic defect babies by impregnating my family while they sleep. Oooh yeeaaa... That's the stuff. But keep white knighting.

I wasn't complaining about the rape tag or asking about incest lmao.
The "mind control" question was my first post in the thread

 

[Avidius7]

I wasn't complaining about the rape tag or asking about incest lmao.
The "mind control" question was my first post in the thread

My bad. I thought he was quoting the other guy that did. Killer13 or whatever. lol.

My point still stands though. Tired of seeing people go into every single thread demanding incest while talking negatively about other tags. You would think there's a shortage of incest games or something.

 

[RodrigoOSan]

My bad. I thought he was quoting the other guy that did. Killer13 or whatever. lol.

My point still stands though. Tired of seeing people go into every single thread demanding incest while talking negatively about other tags. You would think there's a shortage of incest games or something.

Yeah, i get it. I also hate when people complain about a tag they don't like in a game instead of just ignoring it.
It's the same shit in every thread.

 

[UmbraRex]

Not tried this yet, but loved Chimera, so am very excited.

 

[MrWiki]

Why start another game if your working on another? Then ask in a poll which of the 2 games should get %100 focus on, I was about to download this game and enjoy it but if it gets on the back burner and forgotten then i should just ignore it all together.

 

[MrFatCat]

So... any chance you'll finish your previous game before jumping ship to this?

 

[MrWiki]

So... any chance you'll finish your previous game before jumping ship to this?

The way the polls are going it looks like Chimera will be the focus game.

 

[emcalansmithee]

Flagged by windows defender.

 

[homor]

Flagged by windows defender.

dont play than

 

[homor]

btw what so horrible can our antihero do instead of being depresed shit and being prevented to do something by others....

 

[Look-see]

well the dead girl is somewhat confusing. basically i'm asking if you can keep her in the end, knock up, etc. but i dont expect an answer cause spoilers.

aside from that idk kind of annoyed our minion(first girl we can make ours) was a rape/prostitute victim. feels like its happening alot lately in many games. would've been nice if she had support from previous friends cause she was offering them drugs or something...not her body.

don't really care she wasnt a virgin just annoyed that's her background.

 

[The ArcKnight]

well the dead girl is somewhat confusing. basically i'm asking if you can keep her in the end, knock up, etc. but i dont expect an answer cause spoilers.

aside from that idk kind of annoyed our minion(first girl we can make ours) was a rape/prostitute victim. feels like its happening alot lately in many games. would've been nice if she had support from previous friends cause she was offering them drugs or something...not her body.

don't really care she wasnt a virgin just annoyed that's her background.

I on the other hand care that she wasnt a virgin.
(Mainly because it's a fetish and I find it really hot)

I also actually hate that she was sexually abused. It's something that's popping up in a lot of games lately and I hate it so much.
If you include options for the MC to be dark, cool, i'll roll with it as one of my saves, but don't have love interests/sex partners be former cumdumps.....

I otherwise really like the game but yeah, have her friends use her for drugs if you want to have her be broke and disillusioned, don't have her whored out.

 

[lova lia]

my download is blocked HOW??

 

[homor]

I on the other hand care that she wasnt a virgin.
(Mainly because it's a fetish and I find it really hot)

I also actually hate that she was sexually abused. It's something that's popping up in a lot of games lately and I hate it so much.
If you include options for the MC to be dark, cool, i'll roll with it as one of my saves, but don't have love interests/sex partners be former cumdumps.....

I otherwise really like the game but yeah, have her friends use her for drugs if you want to have her be broke and disillusioned, don't have her whored out.

there is nothing more sexy than sticking it into some dirty whore...(irony) (but it is probably that dark antihero thingy story)

 

[dolfe67]

If you don't like cumdumps (or mind control) that's perfectly fine, it's your preferences. But then find another game and don't ask to change it (or saying it'd would be better otherwise). Or else every game will feel the same, just with a reskin. More than it already is anyway.

 

[Zhaico]

The truth is everything is very confusing, I am not understanding the story, English is not my strong point and I translated it but it is really too confusing...

 

[muschi26]

Are there some translation issues going on? Right at the start:

You witness a tense encounter between two children.

The child from the high district is being forcefully restrained by one from the low district. The law states that those born to the low district must not retaliate nor engage with their privileged counterparts.

What do you do?

And the choices are:

1. Shame high district kid.
2. Call the police
3. Restrain low district kid.

So basically, a rich kid and a poor kid are having a scuffle, and the poor kid has the rich one in a headlock or something? And there’s a law forbidding poor kids from touching rich ones (it’s kind of weird to specify that poor kids can’t retaliate, when in the example it’s the rich kid who’s getting restrained, but whatever). Note that there’s no info on which kid started it, or any other factor to influence our decision besides the law. With this in mind:

1. Shame him for what? Letting the poor kid, who’s his social inferior, get the upper hand on him in a fight? Fair enough, but the MC’s line when choosing this is, “I’d encourage the rich kid to jump off a roof,” which in context doesn’t make much sense? And the psychologist’s reply to this is: “It’s not as easy as you think.” What? What’s not easy? Jumping off a roof? Or is it meant to be that a rich kid jumping off a roof won’t resolve the class situation that easily?
2. Who calls the police over a scuffle between children? Maybe if one of them were caving the other’s skull in with a baseball bat, but from the description, he just has him in a hold. Since the MC and other characters seem to be in their later teens, are we meant to understand that the “children” in the example are older teens too? Even so, I have trouble seeing this as a reasonable response, no matter where the MC’s loyalties lie.
3. I thought this meant the MC would try to break up the fight by restraining the poor kid, who’s the perceived “aggressor” (again, we don’t know the specifics of how the fight started), but the line is, “Since I can’t lay a finger on the rich one, I’d teach a lesson to the poor one.” Huh? Talk about misleading; I thought I was trying to be a good guy by breaking up the fight, but apparently this choice has the MC take out his own frustrations by beating up the poor kid? And the psychologist’s reply is, “Making a note to never allow you becoming a teacher,” which … what? Who ever talked about becoming a teacher? Does she mean the MC should never be allowed around children?

 

[Mommysbuttslut]

Shame him for what? Letting the poor kid, who’s his social inferior, get the upper hand on him in a fight? Fair enough, but the MC’s line when choosing this is, “I’d encourage the rich kid to jump off a roof,” which in context doesn’t make much sense? And the psychologist’s reply to this is: “It’s not as easy as you think.” What? What’s not easy? Jumping off a roof? Or is it meant to be that a rich kid jumping off a roof won’t resolve the class situation that easily?

Interestingly telling the rich kid to jump off the roof increases your empathy stat
Either way, you're thinking too hard about this and discounting the most important part, both the MC and the therapist are both fucking crazy.

 

[Old Grumpy Wolf]

both the MC and the therapist are both fucking crazy.

Isn't that par for the course? My therapist has her own therapist. I'm sure that one has their own and so on and so forth.

 

[homor]

Are there some translation issues going on? Right at the start:



And the choices are:



So basically, a rich kid and a poor kid are having a scuffle, and the poor kid has the rich one in a headlock or something? And there’s a law forbidding poor kids from touching rich ones (it’s kind of weird to specify that poor kids can’t retaliate, when in the example it’s the rich kid who’s getting restrained, but whatever). Note that there’s no info on which kid started it, or any other factor to influence our decision besides the law. With this in mind:

1. Shame him for what? Letting the poor kid, who’s his social inferior, get the upper hand on him in a fight? Fair enough, but the MC’s line when choosing this is, “I’d encourage the rich kid to jump off a roof,” which in context doesn’t make much sense? And the psychologist’s reply to this is: “It’s not as easy as you think.” What? What’s not easy? Jumping off a roof? Or is it meant to be that a rich kid jumping off a roof won’t resolve the class situation that easily?
2. Who calls the police over a scuffle between children? Maybe if one of them were caving the other’s skull in with a baseball bat, but from the description, he just has him in a hold. Since the MC and other characters seem to be in their later teens, are we meant to understand that the “children” in the example are older teens too? Even so, I have trouble seeing this as a reasonable response, no matter where the MC’s loyalties lie.
3. I thought this meant the MC would try to break up the fight by restraining the poor kid, who’s the perceived “aggressor” (again, we don’t know the specifics of how the fight started), but the line is, “Since I can’t lay a finger on the rich one, I’d teach a lesson to the poor one.” Huh? Talk about misleading; I thought I was trying to be a good guy by breaking up the fight, but apparently this choice has the MC take out his own frustrations by beating up the poor kid? And the psychologist’s reply is, “Making a note to never allow you becoming a teacher,” which … what? Who ever talked about becoming a teacher? Does she mean the MC should never be allowed around children?

after all u end in same possition practicaly there is no important choice