the first 3 pics are the pics you asked to be fixed from before and the 7th is censored ? oh you right, that slipped from me, i can fix it though no need to replace it and about the bottom left sure i can do it
Correct me if I'm wrong but is your new image pack with powerairmax going to be based on Dark Helmet's
You must be registered to see the links
? According to the HF thread this mod supposedly broke the combat system. Crushboss advised in that thread that players who are heavy into combat should stick to those mods based on v1.7.5.So - is it beter to instal dark helmet version (which 1?) or Crushboss HF (also which 1?) could you guys please tell me whats the differance (in general) and a little bit updating 1st post with info about different variations would be cool.
- Aug 1, 2017
- 1,567
- 1,697
Then pig_red_short has pink hair instead or red_hair. Instead of deleting it, you can replace pig_pink_short_2.
From now on I trust you to finish the rest. Just send an archive here when you're over and I'll review it all at once. If there are pictures that need to be changed or photoshopped then, I'll do it quickly
Now to answer the questions above. I don't know how broke the combat system is for 1.6. We need to have this debate all together, is the regression brought so bad and irreversible that we'd need to take 1.7.5 as our basis for 2.0? Or does 1.6 brings enough fixes to consider 1.7.5 generally broken?
I'm counting on the new image pack to encourage coders to be interested in the game again and patch it continuously.
1.8 is a no go, because it blocks an important quest, it's literally unplayable (despite the fact I play this version and like it best). That is unless someone can take 1.8 and just revert the changes for the new jewelry system so we have a more or less a perfect version.
Last edited:
consider it doneThen pig_red_short has pink hair instead or red_hair. Instead of deleting it, you can replace pig_pink_short_2.
From now on I trust you to finish the rest. Just send an archive here when you're over and I'll review it all at once. If there are pictures that need to be changed or photoshopped then, I'll do it quickly
Now to answer the questions above. I don't know how broke the combat system is for 1.6. We need to have this debate all together, is the regression brought so bad and irreversible that we'd need to take 1.7.5 as our basis for 2.0? Or does 1.6 brings enough fixes to consider 1.7.5 generally broken?
I'm counting on the new image pack to encourage coders to be interested in the game again and patch it continuously.
1.8 is a no go, because it blocks an important quest, it's literally unplayable (despite the fact I play this version and like it best). That is unless someone can take 1.8 and just revert the changes for the new jewelry system so we have a more or less a perfect version.
as for the qsp parches I've always been using 1.7.5 I had no idea I never used 1.7.6 IDK why and I never heard of 1.8 but if you specify what exactly breaks in 1.8 provide me with the Jack.qsp I can try fixing it
- Aug 1, 2017
- 1,567
- 1,697
Man I feel old. Back when I played this game there was no such quest but I think I got the idea now and my mind is already coming up with ideas
so. i have yet to encounter a bug regarding acquiring felicity and each day passes by normally, what am i missing ? i need some details on what happens that trigger the bug that makes the game unplayable
- Aug 1, 2017
- 1,567
- 1,697
Can you actually end her training? In 1.8 version? I think the guy meant that she needed a certain set of jewelry to be considered "trained"
~o0o~~o0o~~o0o~
You must be registered to see the links
according to its readme is supposed to incorporate Dark Helmet's v1.7.6 while not touching the combat system of crushboss' v1.7.5.~o0o~~o0o~~o0o~
About Dark Helmet's v1.7.6 Mod
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
About Nemth's Mod
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
About Fugitive Red's v1.8 Mod
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
Can we tentatively assign your upcoming mod with PowerAirMax the reference number Jack HF Mod (2.0.0)? Your mod is meant to be the basis for an entirely new set of mods. A new standard if you will.
PowerAirMax in a previous post in this thread mentioned another UI overhaul as well as various significant changes. Last December 2018 he also mentioned in the HF thread about still more planned changes such as the ability to train 6 slaves simultaneously, a more involved way to acquire new unique slaves, and "passive" abilities from having certain slaves. Yet more reasons to give your mod the v2.0.0 designation.
~o0o~~o0o~~o0o~
EDIT: https://f95zone.to/members/powerairmax.918615/, a veteran in the development of Jack since its earliest days, had stated that he could complete Felicity's quest without problems using Fugitive Red's Jack v1.8 downloaded here in F95zone. If ordos is reading this post, if you don't disagree with the findings we respectfully request that you edit your post to state that Felicity's quest can actually be completed in Fugitive Red's Jack v1.8.
Last edited:
- Aug 1, 2017
- 1,567
- 1,697
If one of us can fix the jewelry problem in 1.8, then it'll be our basis. I play on 1.8, and I'm modifying the images in 1.8 (in which I've added pictures from 1.7.3). I've also found four bugs on 1.8 (incorrect image path in json files of specific slaves) that I've fixed.
If we can't, then we'll take Nemth's mod, as you convinced me it was the more stable choice.
About the name, I want to assign it a sober "2.0", without "HF". First thing, it's confusing; I didn't know what HF meant forever. Second, I have no ties with HF; they have done their work as a community, now it's time to build something new. However, a proper acknowledgment will be given, stating that they were the one that made our contribution possible.
About Powerairmax changes, I'm also excited about what he promised. I'm also scarred about some of the propositions (the ability to train several slaves at once... that needs to be well executed). Merging both our work is my wish since the beginning anyway, we'll see how it turns out (and make some tests before, to see if everything works, both technically and "artistically").
- Jan 17, 2018
- 297
- 744
- Aug 1, 2017
- 1,567
- 1,697
Sure, "2.0 F95 Edition", "2.0 F95 Version", or "2.0 F95 Overhaul"... Something in that taste
I also very much prefer v1.8. The QoL changes are just too useful. The image reference errors aren't complicated to fix anyway.
Do you or PowerAirMax have contacts with major modders like crushboss? Perhaps they could help with this problem.
Or if finding a solution proves intractable why not just remove the jewelry requirement with something else? Something acceptable storywise.
How about Jesus' proposal? Jack F95 2.0.0? The last digit is for mods that simply made corrections e.g. Nemth's mod. The second is for mods with minor overhauls to gameplay or some other aspect e.g. Fugitive Red's v1.8 mod (may include corrections). The first is for major overhauls such as your upcoming mod (may include corrections and minor overhauls to gameplay).
I'm thrilled if you guys release just your image pack. (GIFs are ugly.) I read that you two were actually using Photoshop to remove watermarks and some other modification? That's some dedication man! If it were me I'd just crop the offending crap.
Will your upcoming 2.0 image mod include his new UI overhaul? The rest of his fantastic ideas can be added in 2.1 or later.
Is there some way to refer to you without invoking the name of the Son of God in vain? My religion tells me I'll go to hell if I do that.
- Aug 1, 2017
- 1,567
- 1,697
Sadly I personally don't.
That could be a great workaround, yes.
Good idea!
You won't be delighted to read the following: the sex scenes will still be Gif. It'll avoid the game to be 10GB. It was also a technical limitation I couldn't get past when I first started (so it's no question I start all over again). However I removed 95% of the animations; they were awkward looking loops. I tried to achieve the best quality possible for these GIFS.
Here is one exemple of my actual work on this. The writing at the center was a pain in the ass ^^ I hate Patreon so much now, that I don't even to create one for myself
(maybe if the "scenes" folder takes too much of my time... we'll see, but I'd rather find an alternative):You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
Probably. I think we'll get along just fine to add everything anyway
- Jan 17, 2018
- 297
- 744
That's a new one on me. It's a really common name around here. It sounds like "hay-SOOS".Is there some way to refer to you without invoking the name of the Son of God in vain? My religion tells me I'll go to hell if I do that.
About other modders:
About the jewelry problem:
About GIFs:
Side Note Scene Images:
Sample Edit of P...a.....t........r....e...o......n Image:
About PAM's UI Overhaul:
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
About the jewelry problem:
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
About GIFs:
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
Side Note Scene Images:
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
Sample Edit of P...a.....t........r....e...o......n Image:
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
About PAM's UI Overhaul:
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
Last edited:
Really? I'm new to these fora so I don't know much about the people here.
Just kidding of course. Though I'm glad lots of people use that name, a good name.
Are you guys familiar with h...i..t....o...m.....i.....dot....l....a?
In some respects it's probably the best site to obtain professional-quality images for your purposes. Unlike the other site which was mentioned some pages back as far as I know it doesn't periodically expunge its images. There you may find images that were deleted elsewhere.
Another important thing to note is that in the other site the images are in jpg i.e. no transparency. This works fine for scenes but not for the fullbody/paperdoll images that require transparent backgrounds. This site however contains PNG converted to WEBP (which can easily be converted back to PNG through several free programs) or the actual PNG for older files.
It has three major drawbacks though.
1. Royal pain to search for tags
2. Many image sets only have thumbnails for the first image in a subset or even the entire set.
3. Ads. Lots of them.
In some respects it's probably the best site to obtain professional-quality images for your purposes. Unlike the other site which was mentioned some pages back as far as I know it doesn't periodically expunge its images. There you may find images that were deleted elsewhere.
Another important thing to note is that in the other site the images are in jpg i.e. no transparency. This works fine for scenes but not for the fullbody/paperdoll images that require transparent backgrounds. This site however contains PNG converted to WEBP (which can easily be converted back to PNG through several free programs) or the actual PNG for older files.
It has three major drawbacks though.
1. Royal pain to search for tags
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
2. Many image sets only have thumbnails for the first image in a subset or even the entire set.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
3. Ads. Lots of them.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
Last edited: