I am truly sorry that you have been put in the position of defending (for a lack of a better phrase) "the bleeding obvious".Anyone is welcome to criticize my story as being badly written, but I am bothered by comments that suggest I was trying to appeal to a particular fetish. I don't think anything about the story up until this point suggests that, and in fact suggests the opposite.
Unfortunately, the ending of Episode Four has not been understood in the way I intended it to be. It's intended to be a dark story beat, an emotional gut punch for the MC and the player. I wrote six pages on this for my supporters but I'll give a brief TLDR:
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
I know this sounds like hearing something from one of the "converted," but you achieved everything you set out to do. That's not me talking as an uncritical fanboi, it's after really getting into the meat of the story and the dialogues to seek a better understanding of everything presented so far.
One of the most significant and refreshing aspects of LeavingDNA is that you do confront the harsh realities of murder, rape, incest et al, and the emotional damage they can do, and you do it in an exceptionally sympathetic way. This has been obvious from the first episode. These elements are presented in the least fetishized manner possible. If anyone started to "enjoy" (for lack of a better euphemism) the testimony during Jamie's trial, I would like to think they felt a little shame by the end of it.
I expect most players came away horrified by the episode 4 cliffhanger, not turned on by it. I guess you'll know for sure by the feedback you've gotten. That being the case, then surely it's "mission accomplished." You elicited the expected emotional response from your audience and took them completely by surprise.
But... as the saying goes: You can please some of the people some of the time. but you can't please all of the people all of the time.