- Dec 17, 2017
- 419
- 509
- 183
I think the mark of a good game (or book) is one that sparks players (readers) to think and then motivates them to speculate about where the adventure is headed and create their own "what if" scenarios. Belle's game is definitely one of those....I will say is that I write my characters as if they are actual people. Most adult game developers create their characters as vessels for the scenes they want to see. It means that the characters will sometimes disagree with the direction I intended to take them in, forcing me to change things around, but that's okay. It makes for a better story with more believable characters.
I'm also "respectful" towards the characters I write. What I mean by that is that the characters have agency and don't just exist as sexual gratification for the player. They have their own needs and wants, and they don't always fit well into the player's schemes. Characters like Evelyn are strong and independent, able to make their own decisions and make positive change even if the player doesn't get involved.
It's weird that people use fake pledges. I mean coming here is literally one easy Google search away, making a fake pledge harder both in execution and concept.I just got some good news from Patreon. They have given me access to their Charge Up Front feature, so that should be the end of fake pledges. It will make the total pledge amount far more accurate from the beginning of next month. IYou must be registered to see the linksexplaining the changes and what they mean for both new and old patrons.
This takes a load off my shoulders, let me tell you. It's been so annoying watching people fake pledge all the time. If people want to pirate my game, the least they can do is to not flaunt it in my mailbox.
Everyone knows about Google though, and we are literally the second result.Guess not everyone knows about F95
Don't know what that is honestly.Second explanation would be the patreon bonus...
Why would Patreon even do something like not collecting money immediately? This is literally how nearly every common commercial exchange has worked since the beginning of trade. Go try and buy a car by telling the dealership "Look I'll take the car now, but I pinky swear I'll pay you later."I just got some good news from Patreon. They have given me access to their Charge Up Front feature, so that should be the end of fake pledges. It will make the total pledge amount far more accurate from the beginning of next month. IYou must be registered to see the linksexplaining the changes and what they mean for both new and old patrons.
This takes a load off my shoulders, let me tell you. It's been so annoying watching people fake pledge all the time. If people want to pirate my game, the least they can do is to not flaunt it in my mailbox.
I agree with your point, but that's a really bad example as cars and many other consumer items are easily bought by paying in installments.Why would Patreon even do something like not collecting money immediately? This is literally how nearly every common commercial exchange has worked since the beginning of trade. Go try and buy a car by telling the dealership "Look I'll take the car now, but I pinky swear I'll pay you later."
Nice to know you are going to get the money you deserve Belle.
View attachment 112813
Plus you are one of the nicest and the most pirate friendly devs ever, so why jerk you around?
Are you sure you aren't just missing the arrows on the clue screen? As the number of clues grow, they end up spread across multiple pages.hopefully somebody here can help me in exposing primrose's small secret. I've exhausted all dialogue with her, worked every morning shift with her to the point where there are no new sequences and yet i haven't been able to unlock the hint about her giving the erotic books to her dad. anybody willing to let me know how to do this?
Isn't everyone?Are you searching for something that doesn't exist?
"Yes, Miss Samarra, I may have been desperate for money, giving me motivation to kill Truthsayer Merek, but here's two bags of money I suddenly got at the time of his murder to prove my innocence."When I first read Primrose's explanation of what had happened, I was struck by how easy it would be to upset Samarra's opinion of the motive for the murder. Just have Primrose produce the two bags of gold coins given to her by the old woman. Samarra's whole theory was that Primrose was desperate for cash to keep the library open. Yet here in her possession is coin enough to keep the library afloat indefinitely. The presence of this stash would also help substantiate the story about the old woman. Together with the chameleon scales, this should be more than enough to rid Primrose of any suspicion in the crime.
And yet, Dickon never mentions it after he hears of it, and certainly not in his talk later with Samarra. Strange. If he believes the coins would be confiscated as evidence, he never says it... or even thinks it.
What is also strange, is that no one else here on this thread seems to have mentioned this.
While keeping the library afloat is Primrose's main concern, she has a Code (thank you Terry Pratchett). That Code is to follow the rules, and by accepting the money, she broke the rules (she wasn't allowed to let anyone in). The only justification she has for breaking it, was to save the library, even though it's her greatest Shame. So, if she came forward and told Samara what she did and gave the money, Everyone would know she broke her Code (not that anyone would care, but it did in her mind), and even though she'd be free, the money would be gone and she would have broken her Code for nothing. Her self-perceived reputation would be shot (again, even though anyone would understand and not judge her).When I first read Primrose's explanation of what had happened, I was struck by how easy it would be to upset Samarra's opinion of the motive for the murder. Just have Primrose produce the two bags of gold coins given to her by the old woman. Samarra's whole theory was that Primrose was desperate for cash to keep the library open. Yet here in her possession is coin enough to keep the library afloat indefinitely. The presence of this stash would also help substantiate the story about the old woman. Together with the chameleon scales, this should be more than enough to rid Primrose of any suspicion in the crime.
And yet, Dickon never mentions it after he hears of it, and certainly not in his talk later with Samarra. Strange. If he believes the coins would be confiscated as evidence, he never says it... or even thinks it.
What is also strange, is that no one else here on this thread seems to have mentioned this.
Of course it works. There is no proof of when she got the coins, but it credits her story of the old woman, which is further verified by the discovery of the chameleon scales. It is not proof that she is innocent, but it at least pokes holes in Samarra's theory, and provides an alternate theory of the crime, and bolsters the theory provided by the scales alone.Doesn't really work now, does it?
I might buy that, but Dickon is not bound by any code of Primrose's, and should be more than willing to break it, to keep her out of prison.Primrose is a stickler for the rules, so admitting she broke the rules is worse than clearing herself for murder. She'd rather be a hyporcrit in her own mind and bear the burden alone than Everyone knowing it and judging her (even though those Everyone doesn't exist).