You say that but you dismiss what I'm saying about variables with a "Yes, but ..." response, like you know better.
Wrong, I dismissed nothing I stated an opinion based on a simple fact, that is about the the writing of the story for sake of immersion and wondering out of curiosity if something cannot be implemented why not adept the writing, big difference. Just because there is a "but" in a sentence does not mean it has to be dismissive and if one cannot ask then you as a teacher is not explaining me anything but telling me and expecting me to just simply nod yes whether I agree with it or understand it does not matter and if that is the case then sorry but that is not much to learn from if one expects to just listen and not question.
What hostility? Advising you to see for yourself? You keep bringing up the same point over and over, clearly you don't care about explanations. Have your own practical experience, maybe you'll understand then why variables are useful.
This sentence gives off a different vibe yet comes down to the same thing just worded more polity compared to the previous " maybe try making a game or whatever and then you'll stop with the nonsense " you gave me. But the fact your use of " you'll stop with the nonsense " and how it was worded it gives clear indication that not only has clear intent of genuine curiosity as to why or why not something is possible or impossible has been thrown out the window but also making out sound as if I was complaining and not only that, but outright making it as if I was complaining for the sake of complaining, hence hostility. And if not that, impatience to explain something. Also tone down on the smart part because honestly just saying, Dev's would be more then enough adding "smart" to everything just takes away the legitimacy to take something serious after a point. Also there is no such thing as "smart" dev, it's either experienced or inexperienced. That is by the way clearly my personal take and opinion on that matter and if you want to or care to try and change my opinion about that,try explaining me why
MY opinion ( without the need to sound smug as if you are on a throne sitting talking to a peasant ) am wrong about this.
The people I work with are smart, they don't need to be explained the same basic concept over and over. That way you don't get frustrated like you're trying to explain programming to a 5 year old. FYI I also teach and assist my colleagues in programming, and I only get positive feedback. Maybe it's not me, it's you.
Smart is being subjective, as a Teacher you should know that. Just because one can program or know how to program or make programs does mean they are overall smart, it mean they know their field and are "smart" in that said field, lets be clear on that. Second that THEY don't need be explained basic concept over and over again does not mean anything other then that they can grasp and fathom what you help and teach or work with as they are basically in the field and have some experience with it. The fact you have to said " That way you don't get
frustrated like you're trying
to explain programming to a 5 year old " gives me the impression that anyone who does not understand your explanation ones or twice is automatically not "smart" and makes me question your teaching capabilities as it sounds like you would dump and give up on them the second you get that impression, so maybe it's not me, but exactly as I said before..just you.
So your answer to the problem is to restrict literary freedom.
Maybe they should just remove all dialogs, that way there's no confusion about incest because it's simply not mentioned at all, which was the point in the first place.
People want incest and your solution is to remove all occurrences of "mom", "sister", "daughter", "aunt" ... that's nonsense, AGAIN.
Wrong, that is not what I meant, there is a difference in between removing it the intended genre of the story and in its stead keep something that break immersion, When was the last time you had sex and clearly hear the words " Husband I am cumming, Wife I am cumming, Fiance please bend over " maybe somewhere out there that could be a fetish but for most people that would be a weird thing to say and a mood killer.
You are sooner and more commonly to hear either " I am cumming"
Or
" Baby/Babe I am cumming" then you would something else. Would it break the immersion now, does it take away the relationship ? no ? the fact that if the story makes it clear and it is written proper one would know who it is exactly they are fucking or is busting their nut in/too without the need to add landlord/mum/dad/daughter/uncle/tenant/neighbor/friend in it.
If the patch is doing well the story makes sense but without it, it breaks immersion, so to combat that in a case if you do not want to offend patreon ( or in a case where the Dev does not bother adding a patch and the community has to do it) why not edit the writing in a way where it is satisfactory, Now
I CLEARLY acknowledged what you have given as example that I can see that being the case where you have to go back and forth in games with objectives for example, Glamour and Big brother and Summertime Saga and similar games.
However my second question to it was more for Kinetic Novels where there is non, where basically the game does have choices to be made but the story is a more focused driven one. My question is not to remove the Genre or fetish but the keep the story immersive in a way it does not break it. Maybe this might come off as a surprise to you but SOME people actually do get immersed and in to the story of these games and are not there just for the fap pics. Writing around it has nothing to do with " Smart Dev " coding in this case, it is a question of matter of why not write around it. Better yet since we are talking about " Smart Dev's " I have indeed come across a few Smart ones, they decided the best course of action was the let you decide the relations at the start of the game, this does not break TOS of Patreon and keep the immersion intact and better yet, even SMARTER ones thought it was a even better idea to make the patch already added, all you have to do is write the correct relations and done. Now again let me clarify it for you, I.am.not.A.Dev. So you clearly being a smart one, can you answer me why one does not do that constantly with Kinetic novels ? Just for your information btw, Lord of Imagionation falls under that with branching narratives, at least to my basic common knowledge as a Non Dev. So why can this not be applied here, it would remove the need for a patch, it would also not break immersion and it would keep the same writing ? are you understanding my question ? or is it still vague to you ?
PS: Let me clear about something, I don't claim to know you, I don't. I clearly stated my opinion based on the fact of the impression you leaving behind.