- Apr 26, 2020
- 14,758
- 34,494
Jesus H Christ! Are you people STILL going on about your effing gingers!!!???
This used to be such a fun thread.........
This used to be such a fun thread.........
Well, there's a ginger in the game I very much like to eff ...Jesus H Christ! Are you people STILL going on about your effing gingers!!!???
This used to be such a fun thread.........
Wait, are you suggesting the Irish ginger's would not be drunk???As long as they are not drunk I would clump them together seeing as they share ancestry and my piece of shit brain can not tell them apart.
Oh they'll get drunk for sure but it stops being fun when one of you drunken gingers kills another drunk ginger.Wait, are you suggesting the Irish ginger's would not be drunk???
I'm, saddly, not a ginger, but a fan. On the other hand, I do carry a ginger gene, and am ready and willing to help the cause - I just need to find a ginger lady to do her part!!!Oh they'll get drunk for sure but it stops being fun when one of you drunken gingers kills another drunk ginger.
Is it relevant that Ireland and Scotland got their Ginger Genes from the Nordic countries, the Vikings?As long as they are not drunk I would clump them together seeing as they share ancestry and my piece of shit brain can not tell them apart.
So far, there is one known pregnancy. Not a visible pregnancy yet. Probably more to come, especially after the latest update.Hi. What is the pregnancy content about?
Although I haven't read any genetic research regarding the topic, I highly doubt that the ginger-gene in Ireland and Britain came from Vikings and Norseman. For starters when it comes to their settlement patterns the Norseman had the greatest influence in the Scottish Isles and Mann and the Vikings in the area known as the Danelaw, not the Scottish Highlands or Ireland. As an aside Dutchmen were generally called redheads/redbeards by the Chinese and Japanese in the 17th century.Is it relevant that Ireland and Scotland got their Ginger Genes from the Nordic countries, the Vikings?
Excuse me? The Vikings settled in Ireland in the 9th century. They were also very active in Scotland. In fact they were all over the place in Europe and beyond, ranging as far as Russia and Byzantium.not the Scottish Highlands or Ireland.
Although I haven't read any genetic research regarding the topic, I highly d
The Vikings founded Dublin, so that was definitely some influence there.the Vikings in the area known as the Danelaw, not the Scottish Highlands or Ireland.
A recent study found that the genes for red hair occur most often in regions of historical Viking settlements in Scotland and Ireland.Excuse me? The Vikings settled in Ireland in the 9th century. They were also very active in Scotland. In fact they were all over the place in Europe and beyond, ranging as far as Russia and Byzantium.
I wrote that when it came to their settlement patterns they had the greatest influence in the Hebrides, Mann and the Danelaw, that doesn't mean they didn't settle other places. I'm well aware of the extent of Viking/Varangian trade routes, heck I even remember reading about them raiding the Persian Caspian coast and sailing up a branch of the Oxus river (which at that point still reached the Caspian) and going all the way to Balkh in Afghanistan to trade. But they were mostly that, trade routes. Yes they founded the Rus principalities, Normandy and by extension of the latter Norman Sicily and at least one Crusader State, but as far as I'm aware they didn't come in numbers significant enough to drastically impact the demography of those areas, with the exception of the areas I mentioned before.Excuse me? The Vikings settled in Ireland in the 9th century. They were also very active in Scotland. In fact they were all over the place in Europe and beyond, ranging as far as Russia and Byzantium.
Once again, I didn't mean to say there was no influence, just not enough to significantly alter the demography. Although Norse Dublin was preceded by an Irish settlement.The Vikings founded Dublin, so that was definitely some influence there.
If you could share that study I'd like to read it. According to this wikipage (A recent study found that the genes for red hair occur most often in regions of historical Viking settlements in Scotland and Ireland.
Where they went, their genes went too. And even if they left, or didn't stay long, some genes stayed and these will occasionally pop up in new generations. It's as simple as that. No need to change the demography.I wrote that when it came to their settlement patterns they had the greatest influence in the Hebrides, Mann and the Danelaw, that doesn't mean they didn't settle other places. I'm well aware of the extent of Viking/Varangian trade routes, heck I even remember reading about them raiding the Persian Caspian coast and sailing up a branch of the Oxus river (which at that point still reached the Caspian) and going all the way to Balkh in Afghanistan to trade. But they were mostly that, trade routes. Yes they founded the Rus principalities, Normandy and by extension of the latter Norman Sicily and at least one Crusader State, but as far as I'm aware they didn't come in numbers significant enough to drastically impact the demography of those areas, with the exception of the areas I mentioned before.
Once again, I didn't mean to say there was no influence, just not enough to significantly alter the demography. Although Norse Dublin was preceded by an Irish settlement.
If you could share that study I'd like to read it. According to this wikipage (You must be registered to see the links) the central aspects of the Irish genome were established 4000 years ago. It also mentions that there is a large degree of genetic similarity between the Northeastern Irish population and that of Southern Scotland and Cumbria, which they interpreted as being a result of the 17th century Ulster Plantations.
Just you. Are you pursuing all girls in the game?It's just me or the last 2 updates don't have any sex scenes?