Q Who

Well-Known Member
Donor
May 16, 2017
1,718
1,791
Completely disagree and here is the definition that I was supposed to look up from dictionary.com:

Rape:
"unlawful sexual intercourse or any other sexual penetration of the vagina, anus, or mouth of another person, with or without force, by a sex organ, other body part, or foreign object, without the consent of the victim."
source:

Also for "you won't find coercion anywhere". From the world health organization:

"Sexual violence is defined as any sexual act, attempt to obtain a sexual act, unwanted sexual comments or advances, or acts to traffic, or otherwise directed, against a person’s sexuality using coercion, by any person regardless of their relationship to the victim, in any setting,including but not limited to home and work."

source:

So no, rape or sexual violence does not need to entail physical violence according to the definitions I was supposed to look into.

Also, you realize blackmail is a crime right? The idea that a vicitim of blackmail is consenting with their blackmailer if they give in to their demands because that is the "choice" they made is simply nuts.
Nice try. The definition does not include anything from the world health organization. If you grope someone without consent. that is sexual violence. Groping and raping are two different things but both are sexual violence. Without consent. There is a huge difference between suck my cock or I will show these pictures to your husband. And suck my cock or I will slash your face with a knife. What part of that is hard? You are playing word salad. Your own definition says without consent. Your world health quote is not the definition of rape. Your first quote is the LEGAL definition of rape. You won't be convicted of rape for blackmailing someone into sex. Nice conflation. "rape or sexual violence" as if they are the same thing. pfft. All rapes are sexual violence. But not all sexual violence is rape. Hence the broader definition. Why don't you find me a conviction of someone convicted of RAPE that did so by blackmail? The without force in the definition means that under threat of violence a person does not resist. This reminds me of people who say that the killing of animals is murder. They play the same game you do. Blackmail involves money or embarrassment. You are nuts for equating it with rape. Blackmail is indeed a crime and in this case, the MC could be charged with blackmail. Not rape.



Rape definition is - unlawful sexual activity and usually sexual intercourse carried out forcibly or under threat of injury against a person's will or with a person


Britannica
Rape, act of with an individual without his or her consent, through force or the threat of force. In many jurisdictions, the of rape has been subsumed under that of sexual assault, which also acts that fall short of intercourse. Rape was long considered to be caused by unbridled sexual desire, but it is now understood as a pathological assertion of power over a .
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: lowcody and poloko

boxedjack

Member
Apr 23, 2017
446
1,220
Nice try. The definition does not include anything from the world health organization. If you grope someone without consent. that is sexual violence. Groping and raping are two different things but both are sexual violence. Without consent. There is a huge difference between suck my cock or I will show these pictures to your husband. And suck my cock or I will slash your face with a knife. What part of that is hard? You are playing word salad. Your own definition says without consent. Your world health quote is not the definition of rape. Your first quote is the LEGAL definition of rape. You won't be convicted of rape for blackmailing someone into sex. Nice conflation. "rape or sexual violence" as if they are the same thing. pfft. All rapes are sexual violence. But not all sexual violence is rape. Hence the broader definition. Why don't you find me a conviction of someone convicted of RAPE that did so by blackmail? The without force in the definition means that under threat of violence a person does not resist. This reminds me of people who say that the killing of animals is murder. They play the same game you do. Blackmail involves money or embarrassment. You are nuts for equating it with rape. Blackmail is indeed a crime and in this case, the MC could be charged with blackmail. Not rape.



Rape definition is - unlawful sexual activity and usually sexual intercourse carried out forcibly or under threat of injury against a person's will or with a person


Britannica
Rape, act of with an individual without his or her consent, through force or the threat of force. In many jurisdictions, the of rape has been subsumed under that of sexual assault, which also acts that fall short of intercourse. Rape was long considered to be caused by unbridled sexual desire, but it is now understood as a pathological assertion of power over a .
Lol, maybe don't quote only half a sentence to fit your argument?

From your own source Merriam-Webster (now in its entirety):
Rape:
" unlawful sexual activity and usually sexual intercourse carried out forcibly or under threat of injury against a person's will or with a person who is beneath a certain age or incapable of valid consent because of mental illness, mental deficiency, intoxication, unconsciousness, or deception "

See all these or's you conveniently left out?
It says:
1. carried out forcibly
2. Or under the threat of force.
2. Or with a person who is beneath a certain age (known as statutory rape)
3. Or Incapable of vaild consent.

So again no, rape does not need to entail physical violence even according to your own source.
 
Last edited:

Q Who

Well-Known Member
Donor
May 16, 2017
1,718
1,791
From your own source (now in its entirety):
Rape:
" unlawful sexual activity and usually sexual intercourse carried out forcibly or under threat of injury against a person's will or with a person who is beneath a certain age or incapable of valid consent because of mental illness, mental deficiency, intoxication, unconsciousness, or deception "

See all these or's you conveniently left out?
It says:
1. carried out forcibly
2. Or under the threat of force.
2. Or with a person who is beneath a certain age (known as statutory rape)
3. Or Incapable of vaild consent.

So again no, rape does not need to entail physical violence even according to your own source.
[/QUOTE]
Yeah just like you ignored the 2 major dictionaries to go with a dot com source. My proof is that you won't find a single legal case of rape to support your absurd assertion. Go ahead, find me a case where a woman or man who was "blackmailed" into sex resulted in the blackmailer being charged with rape. Find me a case. Go ahead. LOL the valid consent was clarified. Funny how you did not list them. They included a person passed out and those situations. It does not mention blackmail. You are one of those people who say animals are murdered. Incapable. Got it incapable. Being blackmailed does not make you "incapable". Idiot playing with single words to try and take them from their context. Exactly what vegans do. BTW rape is classified as an assault. Blackmail is classified as assault? Where do these people come from?
 
  • Like
Reactions: poloko

pandor666

Member
May 6, 2017
109
185
I drop by here from time to time with hope for some new insides and i am forced to read all that Nonsense You make.

If You kill someone one person will call it Murder other Hit another Justice other Self defence and it will be still same thing but from difrent point of View. Just drop it guys.
 

Q Who

Well-Known Member
Donor
May 16, 2017
1,718
1,791
or incapable of valid consent because of mental illness, mental deficiency, intoxication, unconsciousness, or deception "
And you cut it off at invalid why? Invalid consent because of. Then it names what is invalid consent.
 

Q Who

Well-Known Member
Donor
May 16, 2017
1,718
1,791
I drop by here from time to time with hope for some new insides
Yeah right. 8 months since the last release. What insides have come out in 8 months? It is called the scroll wheel. Try it. Or the ignore button.
 

Deleted member 833007

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2018
1,553
3,968
Its the f****** internet nothing is valid and again everything is valid at the same time..Drop your silly arguments,your messing up my notifications...and all these thoughts about linda is making me horny..I want to fuck somebody or something right now..**Oh i forgot i bought a new pillow yesterday...I am going to hump the shit out of it.
 

boxedjack

Member
Apr 23, 2017
446
1,220
Yeah just like you ignored the 2 major dictionaries to go with a dot com source. My proof is that you won't find a single legal case of rape to support your absurd assertion. Go ahead, find me a case where a woman or man who was "blackmailed" into sex resulted in the blackmailer being charged with rape. Find me a case. Go ahead. LOL the valid consent was clarified. Funny how you did not list them. They included a person passed out and those situations. It does not mention blackmail. You are one of those people who say animals are murdered. Incapable. Got it incapable. Being blackmailed does not make you "incapable". Idiot playing with single words to try and take them from their context. Exactly what vegans do. BTW rape is classified as an assault. Blackmail is classified as assault? Where do these people come from?
I only ever challenged your notion that quote "Rape is physically forcing sexual acts on another person". It is clearly more than that even according to your sources Merriam-Webster and Brittannica. I already gave the whole Merrian-Webster definiton. Here is clarification from Britannica:

Britannica:
"In many rape trials, the guilt or innocence of the accused hinges on whether or not the victim to sexual intercourse. "
...
"Sexual intercourse with a person below the is termed statutory rape, and consent is no longer relevant."
source:
-> Rape does not require violence or the threat of violence.

My point is: Rape does not require physical force or the threat of physical force, but a lack of consent.

I guess the whole dissconect comes from what you consider consent? It doesn't really matter. Let's agree to disagree and stop here before more people start complaing:ROFLMAO:.

And you cut it off at invalid why? Invalid consent because of. Then it names what is invalid consent.
I did give the whole qoute. Right above that. I was lazy and didn't retype it a second time:p.
 

Ennoch

Conversation Conqueror
Donor
Respected User
Oct 10, 2017
7,537
21,248
Have anyone noticed the pattern that a harely quinn type girl always come with a lolli? As if thats part of her wardrobe. I don't mind, i particularly like this dark crimson one but its funny.
 

armion82

Message Maven
Mar 28, 2017
12,231
16,765
Have anyone noticed the pattern that a harely quinn type girl always come with a lolli? As if thats part of her wardrobe. I don't mind, i particularly like this dark crimson one but its funny.
In Babysitter and My Cute Cousin they are not lolis.
 
3.80 star(s) 437 Votes