Ren'Py Completed Milfy City [v1.0e] [ICSTOR]

3.70 star(s) 475 Votes
Discussion Reviews (475)
Q Who

Q Who

Well-Known Member
Donor
May 16, 2017
1,720
1,794
279
The game whose name must not be spoken in this thread. Is so different than this one. I only recently played the game whose name must not be spoken after so many positive statements about it here.

Now, I do understand this is a porn game I am talking about. But there is an actual plot in the game whose name must not be spoken here. The MC has friends. The MC had a job not tied to sex. The MC looks, acts and dresses like an 18-year-old and not 14 years old. Oh yeah, and every one the MC is interested in fucking. Have no blood relationship at all.

As I have read posts in "the game whose name must not be spoken here" thread. I see there are page after page of game\plot discussion. That simply is not possible with Milfy City.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jaun Karr and sandstorm1872
Nialis

Nialis

New Member
Nov 18, 2018
6
6
88
Such a great game. You've done an incredible job so far! I hope we get more soon. Keep up the good work!
 
A

adulttroll

Newbie
Apr 28, 2019
31
9
97
Q Who said:
The game whose name must not be spoken in this thread. Is so different than this one. I only recently played the game whose name must not be spoken after so many positive statements about it here.

Now, I do understand this is a porn game I am talking about. But there is an actual plot in the game whose name must not be spoken here. The MC has friends. The MC had a job not tied to sex. The MC looks, acts and dresses like an 18-year-old and not 14 years old. Oh yeah, and every one the MC is interested in fucking. Have no blood relationship at all.

As I have read posts in "the game whose name must not be spoken here" thread. I see there are page after page of game\plot discussion. That simply is not possible with Milfy City.
Click to expand...
im curious now, gimme that name :p
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: saud cheema, Q Who and MonkeyFist1010
Umgenlied

Umgenlied

Member
Sep 3, 2017
236
590
296
adulttroll said:
im curious now, gimme that name :p
Click to expand...
"NTR Knight"

Nah i'm just fucking with ya. He might mean "Melody", "Where the Heart Is", "Acting Lessons", or "City of Broken Dreamers" perhaps? I haven't played none of those but i know they don't involve incestual relationships in their stories, have somewhat of a developed plot and are famous enough to be what he means.
 
Agent HK47

Agent HK47

Active Member
Mar 3, 2018
685
2,422
402
Umgenlied said:
"NTR Knight"

Nah i'm just fucking with ya. He might mean "Melody", "Where the Heart Is", "Acting Lessons", or "City of Broken Dreamers" perhaps? I haven't played none of those but i know they don't involve incestual relationships in their stories, have somewhat of a developed plot and are famous enough to be what he means.
Click to expand...
3 letters: BAD
 
Vordertur

Vordertur

Member
Jul 21, 2017
209
575
126
TomberryDude said:
This is why patreon isn't a storefront. i don't disagree. I'm scared to pledge money on crowdfunding projects because I'm not exactly rich. So I don't. And then I feel a bit bad when the game turns out actually awesome.

Point being. While I agree with you, I think it's kinda dumb to expect "professionalism" in that way.
Click to expand...
I'm glad someone at least gets what I'm trying to say here.

This whole model is like gambling. Going to a casino, throwing down money and... well, if you win, you win. If you don't... then you should have gone into the whole thing expecting to not win.

That's just it, though. I don't dispute that people who patronize (And I mean that in the sense of "actually being a patron" and not "being condescending") should only donate as much money as they're willing to lose. But I guess, where we differ is that it's kind of a ridiculous model for supporting the actual production of things. And people keep insisting "Well, that's not what it's for."

Thing is, I agree with that, too. That isn't what it's for. But that's how it's being used. It's being used as, essentially, a primary income stream. A revenue stream intended to replace, say, a full-time job. And yet folks want to insist that there should be a double standard. Or, perhaps, more accurately, that there should be no standards. That if you are relying on people's donations to survive, you should be exempt from having to follow, essentially, the same "rules" that the rest of the world does. In any other job, you don't get paid if you don't produce. And we can go round and round on how this is essentially a self-defeating system. But it's still the system we currently have. We don't live in Star Trek's United Federation of Planets where basic survival needs are fully met by the social structure and there's no need to worry about where your next meal is coming from or whether you'll have a roof over your head next week. And because those are no longer concerns, you can devote all your energies to uplifting the rest of humanity via art/culture/science/whatever.

We don't have that. Be nice if we did, but we don't.

That being the case, yeah, I'm sorry, but I feel I should hold people accountable the same way I would if I were giving them money to... I don't know, wash my car. Or renovate my house. Or set my broken arm.

The crux of it is that I think there's a line to be drawn somewhere. Hell if I know where, but there has to be some kind of middle ground between the people who are saying "I gave you a dollar at some point in the past, that means I know hold ownership of your immortal soul and you will produce pr0n for me until I say otherwise" and "Expect nothing from these people you give money to, you should be honored that they're even taking your filthy cash." Like, I know I'm strawmanning a little, but I feel like the number of people who don't even want to admit there's middle ground here vastly outnumber those who think that there should be at least a modicum of "professional responsibility" (whatever that entails.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: cafaboz, sandstorm1872, Teaber and 4 others
TomberryDude

TomberryDude

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2017
1,459
5,790
729
Vordertur said:
I'm glad someone at least gets what I'm trying to say here.

This whole model is like gambling. Going to a casino, throwing down money and... well, if you win, you win. If you don't... then you should have gone into the whole thing expecting to not win.

That's just it, though. I don't dispute that people who patronize (And I mean that in the sense of "actually being a patron" and not "being condescending") should only donate as much money as they're willing to lose. But I guess, where we differ is that it's kind of a ridiculous model for supporting the actual production of things. And people keep insisting "Well, that's not what it's for."

Thing is, I agree with that, too. That isn't what it's for. But that's how it's being used. It's being used as, essentially, a primary income stream. A revenue stream intended to replace, say, a full-time job. And yet folks want to insist that there should be a double standard. Or, perhaps, more accurately, that there should be no standards. That if you are relying on people's donations to survive, you should be exempt from having to follow, essentially, the same "rules" that the rest of the world does. In any other job, you don't get paid if you don't produce. And we can go round and round on how this is essentially a self-defeating system. But it's still the system we currently have. We don't live in Star Trek's United Federation of Planets where basic survival needs are fully met by the social structure and there's no need to worry about where your next meal is coming from or whether you'll have a roof over your head next week. And because those are no longer concerns, you can devote all your energies to uplifting the rest of humanity via art/culture/science/whatever.

We don't have that. Be nice if we did, but we don't.

That being the case, yeah, I'm sorry, but I feel I should hold people accountable the same way I would if I were giving them money to... I don't know, wash my car. Or renovate my house. Or set my broken arm.

The crux of it is that I think there's a line to be drawn somewhere. Hell if I know where, but there has to be some kind of middle ground between the people who are saying "I gave you a dollar at some point in the past, that means I know hold ownership of your immortal soul and you will produce pr0n for me until I say otherwise" and "Expect nothing from these people you give money to, you should be honored that they're even taking your filthy cash." Like, I know I'm strawmanning a little, but I feel like the number of people who don't even want to admit there's middle ground here vastly outnumber those who think that there should be at least a modicum of "professional responsibility" (whatever that entails.)
Click to expand...
Someone I have a lot of respect for used to say you should only consider pledging on crowdfunding platforms if you have disposable income.

It's not an investment. You have no garantee you'll see return on that money in anyway, it could be gone forever and there's not much you can do in most cases. Maybe it is a fair point that it's a bad system or that it shouldn't work that way. But it does.
 
Aristos

Aristos

Forum Fanatic
Dec 28, 2017
5,851
17,572
913
Vordertur said:
I'm glad someone at least gets what I'm trying to say here.

This whole model is like gambling. Going to a casino, throwing down money and... well, if you win, you win. If you don't... then you should have gone into the whole thing expecting to not win.

That's just it, though. I don't dispute that people who patronize (And I mean that in the sense of "actually being a patron" and not "being condescending") should only donate as much money as they're willing to lose. But I guess, where we differ is that it's kind of a ridiculous model for supporting the actual production of things. And people keep insisting "Well, that's not what it's for."

Thing is, I agree with that, too. That isn't what it's for. But that's how it's being used. It's being used as, essentially, a primary income stream. A revenue stream intended to replace, say, a full-time job. And yet folks want to insist that there should be a double standard. Or, perhaps, more accurately, that there should be no standards. That if you are relying on people's donations to survive, you should be exempt from having to follow, essentially, the same "rules" that the rest of the world does. In any other job, you don't get paid if you don't produce. And we can go round and round on how this is essentially a self-defeating system. But it's still the system we currently have. We don't live in Star Trek's United Federation of Planets where basic survival needs are fully met by the social structure and there's no need to worry about where your next meal is coming from or whether you'll have a roof over your head next week. And because those are no longer concerns, you can devote all your energies to uplifting the rest of humanity via art/culture/science/whatever.

We don't have that. Be nice if we did, but we don't.

That being the case, yeah, I'm sorry, but I feel I should hold people accountable the same way I would if I were giving them money to... I don't know, wash my car. Or renovate my house. Or set my broken arm.

The crux of it is that I think there's a line to be drawn somewhere. Hell if I know where, but there has to be some kind of middle ground between the people who are saying "I gave you a dollar at some point in the past, that means I know hold ownership of your immortal soul and you will produce pr0n for me until I say otherwise" and "Expect nothing from these people you give money to, you should be honored that they're even taking your filthy cash." Like, I know I'm strawmanning a little, but I feel like the number of people who don't even want to admit there's middle ground here vastly outnumber those who think that there should be at least a modicum of "professional responsibility" (whatever that entails.)
Click to expand...
I agree with your post but it was way too long. Let me summarize it for you:

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
 
  • Thinking Face
  • Like
Reactions: sandstorm1872, DiddlerGames and light03
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
3.70 star(s) 475 Votes