- Oct 24, 2018
- 5,574
- 10,342
Because the behaviour of the dev is irrelevant to when discussing the quality of the content they've previously produced.I can't believe people still give 4-5 star reviews for this.
How can you give a game with this history, which will never be finished, more than 2 or 3 Stars? That is just beyond my understanding.
Now, if there was the additional option to rate the dev, that would be an interesting social experiment. I reckon that, within 48 hours, it'd look and sound like 4chan's pol board
PS - see my sig