- Sep 5, 2018
- 710
- 1,390
That's IvyCan anybody tell the name of the futa girl please please i want to know who is so i dont get scenes or any kind of relation with her
You get the choice to shut her down at a party
That's IvyCan anybody tell the name of the futa girl please please i want to know who is so i dont get scenes or any kind of relation with her
Getting sick meant missing work, which means working more to make up for it, which also means I've had less hours to work on MTC. It's still on pace for early 2024. Sitting at about 522 rendered renders and a 139 renders ready to be rendered. The goal was a 1,000 or so, but I'll probably cut it a bit short this update. Just need to find a good place to end it first. Will likely end up being around 800-ish, maybe closer to 900.HOP UP DATE WILL COME SOON....
In Episode 2, there'll be an intro option to cut out any sexual LGBTQ+ content. You'll still interact with Ivy as a character, just not in any sexual form.Can anybody tell the name of the futa girl please please i want to know who is so i dont get scenes or any kind of relation with her
Sucks you have to add some shit like that. Especially due to the fact there's already a choice in place.In Episode 2, there'll be an intro option to cut out any sexual LGBTQ+ content. You'll still interact with Ivy as a character, just not in any sexual form.
Think that choice'll be moot after the changes if ppl turn it off on intro. I think its a good feature to have. Its a game that's too good, and has way too much potential not to include such choisesSucks you have to add some shit like that. Especially due to the fact there's already a choice in place.
That's what choices are for and that choice was already there. Making a whole new choice for the same thing is a waste of time. If people need another choice for the same thing, they're just idiots.Think that choice'll be moot after the changes if ppl turn it off on intro. I think its a good feature to have. Its a game that's too good, and has way too much potential not to include such choises
Unless you know the full script and that's the only obstacle, yeah, sure. But if' it's not and several diffrent variations of choices, it's not. LGBTQ+ has like billions of variations now, and some are easy choices and others are not, whilst some/most are just a headache to go through. If it was just LGBT i'd agree with youThat's what choices are for and that choice was already there. Making a whole new choice for the same thing is a waste of time. If people need another choice for the same thing, they're just idiots.
It's MissFortune's decision, not mine. If it was my game I'd tell people that there's already choices in play and that would be that.Unless you know the full script and that's the only obstacle, yeah, sure. But if' it's not and several diffrent variations of choices, it's not. LGBTQ+ has like billions of variations now, and some are easy choices and others are not, whilst some/most are just a headache to go through. If it was just LGBT i'd agree with you
I know it's MissFortune's game. And i gave my praise. Wise choice to make. Like i said, many variations in LGBTQ+ - Not as easy as just LGBT. You can choose to block all content, or only content for the chars you don't like. It's a huge diffrence. And seing the choice will be implemented, shows there's more choices to come. So if that disgusts or ("god" forbid) offends anyone, it's a good choice to have. Might be offensive or troubeling for you, but as a marketing point it's bestIt's MissFortune's decision, not mine. If it was my game I'd tell people that there's already choices in play and that would be that.
It's not best when it includes more work. But we can agree to disagree.I know it's MissFortune's game. And i gave my praise. Wise choice to make. Like i said, many variations in LGBTQ+ - Not as easy as just LGBT. You can choose to block all content, or only content for the chars you don't like. It's a huge diffrence. And seing the choice will be implemented, shows there's more choices to come. So if that disgusts or ("god" forbid) offends anyone, it's a good choice to have. Might be offensive or troubeling for you, but as a marketing point it's best
I think that's up to the developer, but sure, lets agree to disagree. either way dev's got brains to include it instead of leaving it out imo. and i'll leave it at thatIt's not best when it includes more work. But we can agree to disagree.
The issue isn't whether or not the choice makes the game more accessible. The issue is that the toggle is redundant. Every single LI either is avoidable or is immediately going to be. There's no need to toggle trans content off at the beginning of the game when you can already turn the trans character down without viewing any intimate scenes with her.I know it's MissFortune's game. And i gave my praise. Wise choice to make. Like i said, many variations in LGBTQ+ - Not as easy as just LGBT. You can choose to block all content, or only content for the chars you don't like. It's a huge diffrence. And seing the choice will be implemented, shows there's more choices to come. So if that disgusts or ("god" forbid) offends anyone, it's a good choice to have. Might be offensive or troubeling for you, but as a marketing point it's best
E: More DL's, more potential money
As you say... it saves the dev a headache... and I can't blame the dev. I can, however, blame the kink-shamers... and, I do. As far as I'm concerned; it's just another win for censorship. So, just to be fair, maybe I should start lobbying the dev to provide an opt-out for straight content, or promiscuous content. How about non-monogamous content? Shouldn't I have a choice to change the story right from the start so that I not only don't have to see the cheater but, the cheater won't cheat? Ridiculous. Ridiculous and absurd. Jus' Sayin'The issue isn't whether or not the choice makes the game more accessible. The issue is that the toggle is redundant. Every single LI either is avoidable or is immediately going to be. There's no need to toggle trans content off at the beginning of the game when you can already turn the trans character down without viewing any intimate scenes with her.
The very people who'll be happy to use a beginning of the game toggle are the exact same ones who will end up mad about her friend path scenes just existing.
But hey, if it saves the dev a headache then it saves the dev a headache I guess.
That's what I'm saying. People that push devs like that, are as I said above: Idiots. The more idiotic they are, the more they'll push their point about "How it's best for the game" or "It's good for marketing". It's totalAs you say... it saves the dev a headache... and I can't blame the dev. I can, however, blame the kink-shamers... and, I do. As far as I'm concerned; it's just another win for censorship. So, just to be fair, maybe I should start lobbying the dev to provide an opt-out for straight content, or promiscuous content. How about non-monogamous content? Shouldn't I have a choice to change the story right from the start so that I not only don't have to see the cheater but, the cheater won't cheat? Ridiculous. Ridiculous and absurd. Jus' Sayin'
Well, if ppl complain about a friend only path when its toggled on is rather dumb. But none of you got my point. Trans is one thing, pronounce and all that jazz is more complicated. And that's the idea that got through to me when that choice wouød be implemeted. Like i previousøy stated if it was Just LGBT it would be too much hazzleThe issue isn't whether or not the choice makes the game more accessible. The issue is that the toggle is redundant. Every single LI either is avoidable or is immediately going to be. There's no need to toggle trans content off at the beginning of the game when you can already turn the trans character down without viewing any intimate scenes with her.
The very people who'll be happy to use a beginning of the game toggle are the exact same ones who will end up mad about her friend path scenes just existing.
But hey, if it saves the dev a headache then it saves the dev a headache I guess.
Getting sick meant missing work, which means working more to make up for it, which also means I've had less hours to work on MTC. It's still on pace for early 2024. Sitting at about 522 rendered renders and a 139 renders ready to be rendered. The goal was a 1,000 or so, but I'll probably cut it a bit short this update. Just need to find a good place to end it first. Will likely end up being around 800-ish, maybe closer to 900.
In Episode 2, there'll be an intro option to cut out any sexual LGBTQ+ content. You'll still interact with Ivy as a character, just not in any sexual form.
Yep, the power of the all mighty greenback and those who use it for leverage... which, unfortunately, is, more and more, what makes the world go round. As far as I am concerned, leveraging behavior and controlling others with "marketing" advice is despicable....they'll push their point about "How it's best for the game" or "It's good for marketing"...
Nope. I get your point. I just don't agree. Simple. I not only don't agree but, I'm never gonna agree. Therefore, no further point to discussing. Which is what you really mean when you say, "But none of you got my point...". So, like you said, "let's agree to disagree". I'm good with that... more than happy to allow you to be wrong....But none of you got my point...
I think I'm the one that told him that. You're getting old. The memory is the first to go and mine done up and moved to a different zip code!Yep, the power of the all mighty greenback and those who use it for leverage... which, unfortunately, is, more and more, what makes the world go round. As far as I am concerned, leveraging behavior and controlling others with "marketing" advice is despicable.
Nope. I get your point. I just don't agree. Simple. I not only don't agree but, I'm never gonna agree. Therefore, no further point to discussing. Which is what you really mean when you say, "But none of you got my point...". So, like you said, "let's agree to disagree". I'm good with that... more than happy to allow you to be wrong.
Nah... dirt is old... and my memory is fine. I know because I can remember a time before dirt. Jus' Sayin'You're getting old. The memory is the first to go...
Yeah. I remember a time before there were even particles of dust that much later became dirt. Those were the days!Nah... dirt is old... and my memory is fine. I know because I can remember a time before dirt. Jus' Sayin'
I have 1st of all never pushed my agenda of that being best. I simply agreed that it's better with than not. If it''s "with", Great!, if it's without, great. And 2nd of all im not a kink-shamer (Probably didn't mean me as an iduvidual/personally, but since i was in the discussion i feel it needs to be said). So, in summary, if me agreeing with MissFortune that this was a good idea/did a nice thing, sure, paint me as the bad guyYep, the power of the all mighty greenback and those who use it for leverage... which, unfortunately, is, more and more, what makes the world go round. As far as I am concerned, leveraging behavior and controlling others with "marketing" advice is despicable.
Nope. I get your point. I just don't agree. Simple. I not only don't agree but, I'm never gonna agree. Therefore, no further point to discussing. Which is what you really mean when you say, "But none of you got my point...". So, like you said, "let's agree to disagree". I'm good with that... more than happy to allow you to be wrong.