- Mar 20, 2021
- 210
- 294
I don't know how this game has gone so long without the addition of sleep sex. It looks like it was made for it!
- Jul 10, 2017
- 60
- 488
i think i just put in royalty free music on youtube, and it came up, but i'm not actually sure... The transition and all of that i made almost half a year ago, as it was going to be a part of my original sandbox, but just used it now.ApaGod I got curious about the hacking music, what is it and where did you get it?
You might think it is hot, but there are people out there, that don't agree with you. When I was younger, I thought so too, but now I find lesbian content unappealing and boring. If during a threesome with two women, they kiss and touch each other, it's still fine, because they just provide additional stimulation. In a orgy, where they wait for a turn with the male MC, they can keep each other on the edge, that's also alright for me, but everything else is boring. And I'm not alone, there is a healthy amount of people with more or less extrem aversion against lesbian content.
- Nov 18, 2016
- 4,477
- 10,682
That's not how it works.. because it isn't an alternate universe... it is the same universe, where MC made a different choice. Meaning that LI still has the same likes and dislikes and perversions, the only difference is that she was stopped, but she would still do it.
Cause simple, it is an LI that would fuck an animal... there is no way around it. It is within their character because of the alt-route. Same version of the LI, just that different choices were made, but the personality and character is the same.
That is why avoidable tags that are of the anti-harem variety, simply don't work in harem games. It was only accepted because of the lack of games back in the day, now that there isn't a lack of games, the demographic doesn't have to tolerate it anymore.
e.g. to use a more obvious example, if the choice to stop NTR, is MC stopping the guy, that means had MC not been there, she would have cheated. Thus the choice is pointless because the LI either way is a cheater, just that the cheating was prevented at that time, but it is still within their character to cheat if a guy they desire enough comes along. (i.e. only plot armor be preventing MC from getting cucked, not the LI actually being loyal).
And personalities like that, make for shitty LIs in a harem game. (now swap the dude with an animal and you get the issue with the beast content, it is twice as bad cause now it is two extreme things, not just one).
You have a point, but there is a different type of choices, and it's right here in this game - when it's not MC makes the choice but the player does:
- "The dog seems to be too excited"
- "No, he's just normally excited"
In that second option world, the girl might not have that kink at all.
- Nov 18, 2016
- 4,477
- 10,682
bruh... that is the exact kind of choice that I was talking about XD it is the choice made within the same world, meaning any dog that got horny she would f*ck
that builds it into their personality.That kind of justification is just cope.
Sounds like game is missing NTR tag too, since MC isn't the one condoning it.
- Apr 20, 2018
- 891
- 3,339
you and some others see it that way, I and some other see it different. Neither is right or wrong, so lets agree to disagree on that one.
Want to be a good author? Step 1: Know your audience...
- Jan 20, 2020
- 2,874
- 4,266
I don't care about if you find the scene hot or not nor am I interested in learning about your thoughts on lesbian porn. I agreed with you that all the scenes needed to be implemented first and I was merely expressing my opinion as well in the same post.
- Jan 20, 2020
- 2,874
- 4,266
It can't have the tag until the content actually happens. Although possibly in the planned tags. Either way if the game doesn't interest you, why stay in the thread talking about it?
- Jun 26, 2018
- 8,485
- 11,675
Personally, until the dev implements the option for lesbian scenes not to happen, I don't think I have any interest in continuing the game.
- Nov 21, 2018
- 1,811
- 3,942
..But I mean, literally nothing happened with either choice. The dog licked her face...like a dog. So on what grounds do you make this judgement of the character? Is a dog licking a person's face sexual now? I am not interested in this content either btw and I do not know how the dev plans to implement this content further, but I think this assessment of the character is premature given what was shown(at this point in the game). As far as she is concerned, it was a friendly dog. She only showed interest in having a pet and nothing to do with....that.bruh... that is the exact kind of choice that I was talking about XD it is the choice made within the same world, meaning any dog that got horny she would f*ck
That kind of justification is just cope.
Sounds like game is missing NTR tag too, since MC isn't the one condoning it.
So again what are you using to make this assessment?
Edit: To me this kind of thinking doesn't hold much water because in general a dev could write characters to openly denounce having any interest in doing certain actions based on a single toggle whether it is in a menu for the player to select or a choice in the game universe that the MC decides through player choice. This meta level character assessment is just too much imo. It is a made up story and the character's motivations can be as mailable as the author wants them to be. As long as there is logical consistency within each path, there shouldn't be a reason to call them into question on this meta level. Beyond that, then the author would be at fault.
Idk if this is a good analogy or not but hopefully it gets the point across. If a guy and a girl like each other but the girl cannot stand his drinking habits, but then the guy sees this and is willing to put in the work to go sober, should she dumpster him anyway? I think there is something to be said about a person that goes out of their way to do/not do something just for you even though they may not necessarily want to but do it anyway because they value you more than that thing. As far as in game choices matching this pattern, this is my general outlook on it.
Mind you. this is different from the scenario that you presented, which is indeed sus, but again it is not indicative of what is happening in the game (neither in my analogy btw) at this point in time. You have jumped to that conclusion.
Last edited:
- Apr 20, 2018
- 891
- 3,339
- Nov 21, 2018
- 1,811
- 3,942
- Apr 20, 2018
- 891
- 3,339
sure if that's all you saw in the game and you found the game mysteriously on your hard drive, and you skipped all the content till then and all that happend later via ctrl, then yes that's the pattern
- Nov 21, 2018
- 1,811
- 3,942
So you are saying that they didnt play the game or read the script and pretty much jumped to a conclusion about the characters personality/motivations based on a single image of something that is as innocuous as a friendly handshake?
Then I agree with you.
- Jan 20, 2020
- 2,874
- 4,266
Licking the face doesn't lead to beastiality. You have to want it to happen
- Apr 20, 2018
- 891
- 3,339
na, I said your post is a reductio ad ridiculum, and now you are projecting, but it's okay if you didn't play the game.
You may say that nothing happened and I can't (and don't care to) really disprove it. I selected the path without the dog, so I didn't saw it, but the tags on the thread do not agree with you.