You must be registered to see the links
A political patron is someone who funds the party.

A patron of the arts is someone who funds artistic programmes.
A patron of a charity is someone who allows their name and association with their brand to be used to bring exposure/publicity and therefore financial gain to the charity.
The patrons of a pub, restaurant, or bar, are its customers.
It is absolutely financial based, nothing less.
What is wrong with that, is that the game has been updated a few times since you formed your opinion, so it's out of date & may no longer apply. Yet you're still applying it & presenting it.
As such, you should check the latest update to see if your opinion still holds.
Which is all that I advised. Calm down.
"Passing judgement" is just a synonym for "forming an opinion".
"Unwarranted"? "Respond in kind"? Again, calm down. You're not under attack.
The last sentence was simply acknowledging your admission of lack of recent play time (where most of the level 5 sex scenes have taken place) & therefore advising to play the current version, as the opinion you've currently formed is not representative of the game, anymore.
Your current opinion is out of date, by your own admission. So it is perfectly justifiable & "warranted" to advise you to play the current version, before forming an opinion of the game. Certainly before presenting said outdated opinion.
I specifically responded to your request and provided you with 5 hot scenes.
They are specifically
why I subsequently "advised" to check out the new version, before forming an opinion.
How do you possibly think my context went from being helpful, like that, to suddenly attacking you, as you're suggesting?
Is the

gesture offensive where you live, or something?