This is just being in circles. In that case, this is you being presumptuous that you are attributing this to my mindset.
There's no presumption here -- i have presented my reasoning and you didn't say a single word that'd actually refute it. There's no facts for you to base your claim on, and no facts which you'd cite to support your point, so opinion is the only alternative that's left. If you think differently, feel free to state what you think you're basing your statements on. Because you have yet to do it.
You could make an opinion that Earth is flat. Whatever I say to make my observation that it's in fact spherical would just be my presumption, my own "perception".
The shape of earth can be observed and measured with devices which don't have presumptions or perceptions. Both "flat" and "sphere" are also clearly defined. This is not matter of opinion, but facts. It's disingenuous for you to put yourself in the role of the reasonable person in this analogy, when your observations in our discussion were of completely different nature.
Let's go over to Ian in a sec. Can you say that Minerva solo path is equally catered to a Cindy solo path? It must be my "presumption" that more effort and content are done more on one side than the other.
In terms of content, fun fact. There's 4 sex scenes for Ian/Minerva and also 4 sex scenes for Ian/Cindy. In terms of player satisfaction, there's many more voices expressing dissatisfaction with Cindy's (lack of) appearances in the game as of late, than about limited presence of Minerva. So, one could make a point that Cindy's fans actually feel less catered to, than Minerva's fans.
And herein lies the crux of the issue: you have yet to define what you actually consider as "being catered to". So, instead of asking me this question and shifting the burden on me, how about you make your point in full first and describe precisely how you evaluate this "catering to" Minerva's and Cindy's paths? Then we will have something tangible to apply to the rest of the discussion, instead of apparently expecting me to just somehow know what you think, when you can't be bothered to articulate it.
Yet another one of those, "you can't say that cuz you're not making" As if people can't speak their own minds on the matter. People can make their own reviews. No matter what you say, it won't shut people up.
Absolutely not what i said. If you want to fight strawmen then don't bother. It's a pure waste of both your and mine time.
For the record, what i actually meant wasn't "you can't say that" but "what you're saying is unrealistic [and thus naive and/or stupid]". This doesn't mean you can't say it. By all means, knock yourself out.
Didn't see this one coming!
