- Mar 27, 2021
- 203
- 82
Say, is it possible the choice offer of partnering from Rosalind after dinner with the Carnations doesn appear?
NoSay, is it possible the choice offer of partnering from Rosalind after dinner with the Carnations doesn appear?
From a superficial standpoint this question is kind of redundant since there is pretty much no possibility to create a milf in HS beyond giving her grey hair and stating her age in the bio.But again, I'd ask, are you normally a fan of milfs? I understand the distinction you're making, for me it's the former, flat out.
But that's just it. It's not the *scenes*. It's the *character*.It's just interesting to hear others' perspectives; I would still venture enjoying her character requires some base attractive. For me, I don't care what makes her tick. I don't care that she's a psycho. I don't care that she has darker impulses contrasting with empathy. Evertime I see her, I want to leave the room asap. To me she's a hag trying to relive her more exciting years by more and more extreme sadism. If there was a prompt to run the company as a pair with kathleen or kick her out and never see her in the game again, my reaction time would be in milliseconds.
But that's just me, and I'm glad others find her scenes enjoyable!
She's teaching him the dark side, AND she's purpotedly harming and damaging him.Just kind of ironic that I just understood that she really IS a bad mommy though. She's teaching you the dark side while your mother taught you better.
Lowkey, i think Kathleen is far more desperate and simpleminded than Rosalind. Obviously she is an actual human being and not some sadistic psychopath, but when i look at the subtle differences between low/high affection and deal/no-deal i think it could be argued that as far as mindgames go she's lightyears ahead. Afterall there's a reason why she won't try as hard to win over an Edwin who didn't agree to her deal (despite arguably being a better person, just of less use to her), while 3 weeks in Kath is stll trying hard as ever to win over some random kid who may or may not want nothing to do with her.I must join the chorus in disagreeing. Kathleen's appeal is entirely in her characterization: she's a villain with style, menace, AND a strong thematic link to the hero. That's a combination that's worth it's weight in gold, narratively speaking. There are plenty of antagonists I flat out hate in AVNs (see Cassandra in Artemis for an easy example); Kathleen's an antagonist I love to hate.
It's a small but crucial difference!
Although a great idea, I am a simple minded person. I still want to see her get fucked, literally. I need the visual stimulation for ... reasons .Play a nice guy. Just be as nice as possible to all the other girls. It's basically orgasm denial for Kathleen. Call it corruption denial.
She wants to corrupt MC into venting his sadistic urges on the girls and becoming as big a monster as she is. So be the biggest white knight you can and indulge your sadistic side by denying Kathleen what she desires most. Have your cake and eat it too.
What? Kathleen? Kathleen is VERY obviously a sadistic psychopath. She isn't like a serial killer (and hell, the next update(s) might even correct that assumption), but she very clearly is abusing and exploiting people for her own gain and amusement without a care in the world.Lowkey, i think Kathleen is far more desperate and simpleminded than Rosalind. Obviously she is an actual human being and not some sadistic psychopath
I think he was actually referring to Rosalind with this line.What? Kathleen? Kathleen is VERY obviously a sadistic psychopath. She isn't like a serial killer (and hell, the next update(s) might even correct that assumption), but she very clearly is abusing and exploiting people for her own gain and amusement without a care in the world.
That's what I'm not sure about as well.I think he was actually referring to Rosalind with this line.
Abel: Do you trust your bosses?What? Kathleen? Kathleen is VERY obviously a sadistic psychopath. She isn't like a serial killer (and hell, the next update(s) might even correct that assumption), but she very clearly is abusing and exploiting people for her own gain and amusement without a care in the world.
Or just look up your trust scores in the statistics menuAbel: Do you trust your bosses?
Edwin: One's a gangster, one's a bomb-making hedonist, and one of them is Kathleen Pulman.
This sums up everything.
Precisely. To me, it's the mark of a well written villain when the audience hates them, whereas a poorly written villain makes the audience hate the author.I don't think that's relevant here. MILF fans want to fuck the MILF. I don't think Ename ever said he wanted to fuck Kathleen; he said he appreciates her characterization. As in, he likes how well she's written.
Same with me. I don't want to fuck her, I want to kill her. Or at least get her sent to prison for life. She's doing her job as a villain, which is to make me feel angry and hostile toward her.
So, all that said, how do you feel about Kathleen? Do you want to see her get her just desserts? Or do you think the game would have been better had she never been written?
I agree Rosalind is underappreciated as a manipulator, but I don't think Kathleen necessarily comes off worse by comparison. They're trying to accomplish very different things. First, as you note, Kathleen wants to make people suffer. Lording her victims' helplessness over them is a big part of the fun; a more subtle approach would be counterproductive. Rosalind, on the other hand, just wants her problem solved; the fewer additional enemies she makes in the process the better, hence subtlety is ideal for her.Lowkey, i think Kathleen is far more desperate and simpleminded than Rosalind. Obviously she is an actual human being and not some sadistic psychopath, but when i look at the subtle differences between low/high affection and deal/no-deal i think it could be argued that as far as mindgames go she's lightyears ahead. Afterall there's a reason why she won't try as hard to win over an Edwin who didn't agree to her deal (despite arguably being a better person, just of less use to her), while 3 weeks in Kath is stll trying hard as ever to win over some random kid who may or may not want nothing to do with her.
Although on the flip side, i guess if Kath's endgoal is just to make things as miserable as possible for as many people as possible, then her approach makes a degree of sense. Still think she'd accomplish more if she were half as subtle as Rose, but even Palpatine crossed over to chaotic evil in his old age so who knows.
You'll find out in a couple of yearsI sent the gangster after the loanshark. Hope I didn't make a mistake.
Right before i was talking about Rose and right after i was talking about Rose, so yeah i was talking about RoseWhat? Kathleen? Kathleen is VERY obviously a sadistic psychopath. She isn't like a serial killer (and hell, the next update(s) might even correct that assumption), but she very clearly is abusing and exploiting people for her own gain and amusement without a care in the world.
Eh, don't really see it. Carrot and stick isn't really discreet, it's just carrot and stick. And if you always go for the stick anyway because you like waving it around, then what are you even trying to accomplish. Case in point, the caddle prod. Her main objective there should be getting Edwin to indulge himself, since she obviously cares about it so much (and she can always torment the girls later), yet as sheKathleen, on the other hand, has plenty of tools in her arsenal so she can pick whichever will give the best results. When expedience is the order of the day, she goes straight for the jugular. When she needs something done carefully or wishes to minimize risk, she's quite capable of discretion. Just look at how she handled the punishment game after Week 2. Sure, the warm up with the cattle prod was pretty blatant, but when it comes time for the actual punishment she's quite hands-off because she wants to keep her direct fingerprints off it. She's already ensured the girls will respond the way she desires.