- Oct 18, 2017
- 83
- 364
My comment was about Romans only considering it gay for the one who takes it - like they do in prison.
If you are still talking about the whole cunnilingus thing: Just because somebody does a submissive act doesn't necessarily mean that his whole character is on that side. Aside from that, there where many great men who were absolute simps around their wives.
Just because the non-simps seldom post doesn't mean we are not tired of reading the constant simping. Let's just get along and write about what we enjoy/don't enjoy. Maybe have a civilized discussion or two. No need to try to get everyone else on your side. You are physically safe in front of your screen.
![1000055479.jpg 1000055479.jpg](https://attachments.f95zone.to/2024/03/thumb/3476091_1000055479.jpg)
Here's a beautiful, god fearing, traditional repressed housewife that doesn't know what an orgasm is for you to jerk off to. Granted, she gets a little chatty when her friends come over, but it's nothing that your alpha masculinity can't fix.
You also need to watch out for the milk boy stealing your wife. Rumor around the neighborhood is that he eats pussy like a champ, and has already banged all the women in your wife's church group.
Maybe you can stop clogging up the thread with the homoerotic descriptions of the roman dominance.