You'd be completely right... If not for the fact that you defined TD Kathleen's scenes as "sub-par blackmail femdom bullshit". Sub-par is by definition a merit judgment on TD's narrative ability, and bullshit is halfway there. As such, don't be surprised people can react negatively to it - even if you say that you think the game has good writing.
Sure, but it doesn't change what it was. I'm not one to beat around the bush as arguably it was less femdom and more just outright sexual assault. If people like sexual assault, sure, but to say that it was an accurate representation of femdom would be facetious at best and malicious at worst.
Biscardone said:
It's not a matter of "I don't like what the author likes", that's perfectly fine. Personal tastes differ, and that's all there is to it. Just as an example, this thread periodically gets someone commenting that they couldn't stand this game as it contains a healthy dose of NTR, because they stretch the definition of NTR to absurd limits. But again, there has also been someone in this thread saying "I don't like muscle freaks, it's such a bad idea for the author to put them in the game". That's the difference between having an opinion on the game and having an opinion on TD. They're all opinions, but one usually irritates someone invested in the game more than the other.
Well, again, noting that scene as something that's a poor representation of femdom isn't exactly an opinion, it genuinely is a poor representation. If you're wanting to get into kinkplay and someone decides to blackmail you and touch you without your consent, that isn't femdom even though a lot of AVN's on here seem to think so (which is also it's own issue entirely). Hell, the only reason why I'm calling it femdom and not sexual assault is because so many people on here have such a skewed understanding of what femdom is.
EDIT: I also like to add that I'm someone who enjoys femdom as a tag, which is also why I react a bit more than most when I see a poor representation of it, especially in a popular game. Why? Because there are a ton of people playing this, and likely quite a lot of them will draw inspiration from it for their own projects, which might just perpetuate this extremely shitty and toxic "femdom must be forced and non-consensual" type shit that quite a few games have gone into over the last 3 - 4 years or so. That isn't a good thing. It's like if games all of the sudden started noting "big tits" as only being hyper-inflated bimbo balloons, sure it's "technically" big tits but I reckon quite a few people who are into big tits would have something against it.
Bro, if she upset you, you should have chosen to cum on her face like I did. This is what that choice was for: "you damn bitch, is this is what you asked for? here you have it!"
Yeah I didn't make it that far, I alt-F4'd half-way into it. Even though, I wouldn't exactly go "haha, you drugged and sexually assaulted me without my consent
but I got you by cumming on you!" is somehow a comeuppance. I'd more say jailtime or something similar.
Ottoeight said:
Anyway, I wouldn't call it "femdom". Kathleen likes humiliating people. And this is what the Carnation Club is
You're absolutely correct about that, however there was nothing to indicate that anyone working below her would be subjected to equally fucked up treatment at her whims. Nothing about the 'establishment' is legal, but there are
usually rules regarding management/workers, and again nothing pointed towards that not existing in this specific scenario. The MC is kept purposely in the dark so you can't really expect the player to just go "ah fair enough, guess I'll just get sexually assaulted at any given moment, I deserve that for working here".
And I do know how the game works, I understand the dichotomy, it doesn't however change the fact that Kathleen can be considered an EXTREMELY polarizing figure given how she decided to treat the MC.
For the record, the femdom tag is there cause of all the lezdom. If you tried it on that basis, then there's an even better reason to be put off because in no way you'll be satisfied content-wise, questionable example or no.
To be truthful, I didn't even
notice the femdom tag at a cursory glance, which is likely why it caught me offguard even more than I anticipated. I didn't really try it for any other reason than that I've heard it's a good game.
Oh boy, the moment I read the comment I knew what's going to unfold below. Don't bother guys, he's proficient at drawing questionable conclusions, fixating on them and successfully dragging people in different threads to 'debate' over them
I mean, calling that scene out for being an unfuriatingly poor example of "femdom" isn't exactly a questionable conclusion. Let's break down what happened;
MC got drugged by deus-ex-erection perfume.
MC got forced into pulling his dick out (notably against his will).
MC got forcefully jacked off, again against his will.
Genuine question, would you argue that this is a good example of femdom? Would you argue that my conclusion is in any way questionable about this? I truly want to know how my post is somehow offensive to you, because I really can't see the reason.