I fully understand and I'm one who always thinks the Dev should just do what they want and if it's a fetish that's causes fighting make it avoidable or skippable if the DEV cares about others peoples opinion so much. I also believe the voting is what it is because of the fanbase of this site to be honest. The big 3 Harem, Incest, and NTR are the biggest forces on this site and it's usually Harem Vs NTR crowd.
That's a bit of a contradiction. "Do what you want, except if people don't like it." But also, if the fetish is the whole point, why should it be avoidable? I mean, don't get me wrong, I know about catering to people and how to get the largest audience, but there's a difference between the "largest audience" and "target audience". If someone wants to make a game, based on a lesser known franchise, specifically for that fanbase, he can be liberal with the story and change key elements to cater to as much people as possible, but piss off the hardcore fans, or stay true to the source material and only get a small fanbase. So, he either does what he wants to do, or he does what people want. In most cases, you can't have both.
Oh yes. This game is pretty much anti-NTR. Every opportunity is shut down hard. But because there's a rival, the NTR "monster" rears its ugly head. Even with the NTR switched off, people have complained in the past that Hunter was present. Just goes to show, I guess, people are idiots.
I think it's not really that surprising, most of the harem/vanilla players won't even give a game a chance if they see the NTR tag, so the people that end up sticking around will mostly be NTR fans.
That's true. It's always a surprise to me how far people will stretch NTR. It's like no male that isn't the MC is allowed to have sex. Even with the "NTR avoidable" clarification, people still ask "does that mean that it doesn't happen at all or that we just don't see it, because I don't want that either". Like, dude, grow up. It's a game.
I mean everyone has their preferences, if poeple don't like NTR and want to avoid games with that type of content, I don't think there is anything wrong with that. I don't see a problem with people asking for clarification either. To me the annoying part is when people try force devs to add or remove certain fetishes.
Agreed this website has such a broad definition of NTR, its basically if any other guy is involved it gets tagged as NTR. Not too mention some people are so anal about NTR. I remember a game had an NTR warning stating that in the game you run a brothel and girls over there have sex with clients offscreen just so no one throws a hissy fit. I mean thats not even NTR and shouldn't require a warning. That's why when i see an NTR tag i have to clarify what it means
I dont think we have any info regarding this
I probably should've worded it better. Make it avoidable or skippable if YOU as in the DEV cares what other people think. I don't give a fuck I just won't play your game and won't complain if it's me.
It's funny that there are actually people like this. They don't speak from any personal experience of putting out visual novels themselves and then make claims like this. They haven't written any novels, short stories, or similar literature to demonstrate skill with writing entertaining dialogue. They can't come up with cohesive plots or write effective characterization. They act like creating fluid and decent quality animations is easy but have never even downloaded something like DAZ themselves. And with all of that, they have yet to become adept at coding too. It's ridiculous.
If I am not wrong, that scene is literally from the game, that is a joke the dev made.
My mistake, then. I'm sorry, SuddenReal. I see so much of unrealistic criticism and hypocrisy in comments in different threads, I thought this was more of that. There are literally people who say stuff like that, which I guess is probably the very thing WhatWhy is pointing out, then. I haven't finished the latest update yet, so if it's in Chapter 9 I spoke too quickly; if it's in an earlier chapter, my memory is crap. My apologies; I've changed my earlier comment.
