Jstforme

Well-Known Member
Dec 20, 2019
1,313
3,071
As I said many times it's a game so it doesn't matter. I think people just found the idea of a bitchy teenager deserving abuse a little weird that's it.
As pointed out before, it's a generational thing. If the parents didn't give their child a whooping when they deserved it, the school would do it for them (fact). It was common-think that if you didn't belt your kid in their formative years, they'll grow up to be flakes, losers, unethical, lazy, etc., etc. (sound familiar?)
My generation (X) was the phase out of hard discipline, and a kinder and gentler way was introduced...now spanking bare hand, not alone using a belt is thought of as abuse, when not more than 30 years ago it was thought of as just discipline.
It's hard to argue the results though...especially these a days. Maybe they had it right all along :WeSmart:
 
Last edited:

Uthuriel

Conversation Conqueror
Jan 26, 2021
6,889
21,542
I find Joshy from the Long Story Short thread weird, but what am I gonna do?
You could do what most do?
Cry about it on the forum... maybe even make a thread about it?
Accuse the mods of something...
The possibilities are endless...

Don't let your memes be dreams... :KEK:
 
  • Thinking Face
Reactions: Bombmaster

Badjourasmix

Conversation Conqueror
Sep 22, 2017
7,259
16,387
I find Joshy from the Long Story Short thread weird, but what am I gonna do?
I don't know. Here is the thing if you give an opinion on something on the internet people will react to it and also give their opinion as well. It's kind of the whole point of forums like this. Some comments were a little more on ther personal attack side of things but it's the internet people will overreact to everything :KEK:
 

armond

Well-Known Member
Apr 26, 2020
1,752
5,972
I don't know. Here is the thing if you give an opinion on something on the internet people will react to it and also give their opinion as well. It's kind of the whole point of forums like this. Some comments were a little more on ther personal attack side of things but it's the internet people will overreact to everything :KEK:
I feel like this sentiment is from Futurama, but it's only the vague recollection of a feeling :unsure:
 

Havik79

Conversation Conqueror
Sep 5, 2019
6,823
8,069
Well, I am playing with Maddy on the dark path, so far its been a spanking, a hard spanking, and orgasm denial, so anyone saying it is abuse, needs to get their head sorted, MAYBE it will get worse, but right now it is not abuse.
 

faramata

Active Member
Mar 13, 2022
663
814
You could do what most do?
Cry about it on the forum... maybe even make a thread about it?
Accuse the mods of something...
The possibilities are endless...

Don't let your memes be dreams... :KEK:
Well, I've put him on ignore because every damn notification in that thread is from his simping cum guzzling fantasies. But it was a rhetorical question anyway.
 
  • Yay, update!
Reactions: Uthuriel

PaxHadrian17

Engaged Member
Sep 8, 2020
2,375
11,558
a lovely game ruined by actual loli shit ugh
The only potential Loli I see is Norah, Brooke's daughter.

In my primary playthrough, I did not choose to be sexual with her and she remains a sweet, innocent tween/teen (she looks like a tween to early teen to me).

IF you chose to add the 'special' patch, And you made the choices to treat Norah as a sexual being, then you got the consequences of those choices.

I played the alternate path - yes, curious where that rabbit hole led, and that path includes bathing Norah - which certainly has a sexual feeling to it, and a final choice - whether or not to continue to pursue Norah as a sexual being in the future.

What choices did you make?

If you don't like them, simply go back to a prior save and make different choices and loli/Norah sexualization be gone.

My personal preference is that this option not be a part of Radiant but I won't kink shame, I'll just say that it is not my preference.

Cheers!! :coffee:
 
  • Like
Reactions: RNasc4444

xert13

Member
Sep 24, 2023
449
794
As pointed out before, it's a generational thing. If the parents didn't give their child a whooping when they deserved it, the school would do it for them (fact). It was common-think that if you didn't belt your kid in their formative years, they'll grow up to be flakes, losers, unethical, lazy, etc., etc. (sound familiar?)
My generation (X) was the phase out of hard discipline, and a kinder and gentler way was introduced...now spanking bare hand, not alone using a belt is thought of as abuse, when not more than 30 years ago it was thought of as just discipline.
It's hard to argue the results though...especially these a days. Maybe they had it right all along :WeSmart:
GenX here as well - spot on. There were also spatulas…those mutherfers hurt! The belt was always the go to though, that or getting smacked in the back of the head when your father had a thick College ring from the late 50s on. Ouch. Then there were the nuns…not in a naughty cosplay kinda way. In a fire and brimstone smack you sideways kinda way. Fun times, but we didn’t shoot up schools.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ilhares
4.30 star(s) 288 Votes