well he came at me with pm and told him if thats how he thinks then stay away from my own game because i wont rewrite my story line to appease someone like him. Sandras story line needed to stay the way it was. it doesnt make her tainted it makes her someone you want to help someone you want to bring them to justice for and weak people that cant see that just need to play something else. He really annoyed me and I also have personal reasons why people like that piss me off. Hell he even had the balls to say I must like for women to get raped......
I might need to stock up on snacks for the next release when we learn what happened to MC's mom and that gangbang video. It will turn this thread into a shitshow.
I think it is worth it. It has a lot of elements mixed in a somewhat coherent narrative (better than most VN anyway) and a decent MC, not the brightest but he is none's floormat so that is good in my book.
There is a compressed version that you might try, hold that thought for a moment... Ok, I downloaded the compressed version and it is almost the same, you can hardly notice on a small monitor. I had to compare it on a big screen TV to objectively see a difference in every frame.
Try the compressed version and if you like the first hour or so you can jump to the normal version. You can think of the quality loss as similar as a conversion from PNG. to JPEG. (although in this case it is WEBP.), it will be different for each image and in some you will not notice it.
As you can see the difference is minimal and mostly limited to the size of the sampling area for color gradation as seen in the square artifacting on the buttocks shadow.
I think it is worth it. It has a lot of elements mixed in a somewhat coherent narrative (better than most VN anyway) and a decent MC, not the brightest but he is none's floormat so that is good in my book.
There is a compressed version that you might try, hold that thought for a moment... Ok, I downloaded the compressed version and it is almost the same, you can hardly notice on a small monitor. I had to compare it on a big screen TV to objectively see a difference in every frame.
Try the compressed version and if you like the first hour or so you can jump to the normal version. You can think of the quality loss as similar as a conversion from PNG. to JPEG. (although in this case it is WEBP.), it will be different for each image and in some you will not notice it.
As you can see the difference is minimal and mostly limited to the size of the sampling area for color gradation as seen in the square artifacting on the buttocks shadow.
Hahahaha, just the tone of the talk when this dev introduced sex scenes between your LIs. For some strange reason that is beyond me, lesbian sex is not considered by most as cheating/swinging/polyamory (take your pick). Glad to hear you are approaching the subject this way. You are getting lynched for sure and smeared with the three letter kink.
Day 4 Step 4
The hotel scene in the walkthrough lists [LisaMasturbate] but this is associated to Step 12 with the Pool Scene
Also, step 12 has [LisaRp+3] which the top of WT states these are for harem points. Looking at the script for that scene, it doesn't show of any type of point counter. Even searched the whole script and variable not found anywhere. Was this something that was left over from a previous version?
EDIT:
Further research. Seems Rp=relationship. Saw one of your earlier post about points for scene on Day1. It had jennifer_relationship += 1. Going to that part of script now, this has been removed.
First half of September is passing, any news? and if it's because of proofreading, hell I'll help if you need it that bad, not really doing much now anyways.
I think it is worth it. It has a lot of elements mixed in a somewhat coherent narrative (better than most VN anyway) and a decent MC, not the brightest but he is none's floormat so that is good in my book.
There is a compressed version that you might try, hold that thought for a moment... Ok, I downloaded the compressed version and it is almost the same, you can hardly notice on a small monitor. I had to compare it on a big screen TV to objectively see a difference in every frame.
Try the compressed version and if you like the first hour or so you can jump to the normal version. You can think of the quality loss as similar as a conversion from PNG. to JPEG. (although in this case it is WEBP.), it will be different for each image and in some you will not notice it.
As you can see the difference is minimal and mostly limited to the size of the sampling area for color gradation as seen in the square artifacting on the buttocks shadow.
It is the same process for the normal version and the compressed version. The only difference is that the normal version is divided in 4 parts. You just open the file and drag and drop to where you want to unpack it, the program that you use be it WINRAR, WINZIP, etc., will take care of joining the 4 parts as long as they are in the same folder.