- Aug 21, 2018
- 2,170
- 3,535
So nothing new? Just some kind of remaster? ... what got remastered? .. The renders, but in what way? ...
Of course there is, you get to milk patreon money for producing the exact same content a second time, it's what every dev does nowadays.Well... Really no reason to "remaster" this. Renders were good and they're not even that much better imo now in the remastered version. Just finish the game and use the new skills for rendering in all the yet to be rendered scenes instead...
Remasterception causes deletion.So, this is a remaster of the remaster? Remasterception.
Or in this case a third time. This is the second remaster of the game.Of course there is, you get to milk patreon money for producing the exact same content a second time, it's what every dev does nowadays.
Thank you for the side by side comparison. To me it looks like in the most recent remaster the lighting on the characters are better and brighter. Compare this with some other VN's night scenes where the renders are so dark you can't see anything at all.What the hell. Okay, a lot of shots are from different angles now, not only POV. Can be good, the Remaster of Shut Up And Dance does this for example, and it's great there. But here? Yeah, some of the new renders are great, but does the VN really benefit from that? Look at the first time you meet Irene.
- In the very old version Irene looked great, I love that dress. However, the hallway looks like it is in a cheap rental apartment. And the bright reflection on the left is too strong.
- In the old version Irene looks slightly different, also okay. The new dress sticks to her breasts in an unnatural way, but we all know that it's hard to overcome that. The hallway looks dull but the image serves the right purpose. Irene seems cold and clever and a little but hostile, just as intended. You look her directly in the eye (hopefully).
- Now the remastered version has two images. The background and lighting change without the two characters moving, why? Was the first one not intended to be included? There are also even more artifacts around her breasts. The second one could actually be a good shot AFTER a first one from the MC's POV. You have to feel caught and a bit intimidated. The new images don't achieve that in my opinion.
View attachment 1377559
Another example? Zoe sitting on the bed. For the "older" version the room got a complete makeover. I prefered the very old version but fine. The remastered version is basically the same as the "middle" version but with different lighting, more realistic breasts and the eyes are a bit closed which makes her look more natural. But her skin looks strange in both colour and texture. And where does the green light come from? This image has been remade twice without much improvement in my opinion. I still like the first version best. Why remaster something if you don't improve it on a big scale?
View attachment 1377624
You literally showed a few pictures out of 500. And you pick the ones you thought were better in the older version.What the hell. Okay, a lot of shots are from different angles now, not only POV. Can be good, the Remaster of Shut Up And Dance does this for example, and it's great there. But here? Yeah, some of the new renders are great, but does the VN really benefit from that? Look at the first time you meet Irene.
- In the very old version Irene looked great, I love that dress. However, the hallway looks like it is in a cheap rental apartment. And the bright reflection on the left is too strong.
- In the old version Irene looks slightly different, also okay. The new dress sticks to her breasts in an unnatural way, but we all know that it's hard to overcome that. The hallway looks dull but the image serves the right purpose. Irene seems cold and clever and a little but hostile, just as intended. You look her directly in the eye (hopefully).
- Now the remastered version has two images. The background and lighting change without the two characters moving, why? Was the first one not intended to be included? There are also even more artifacts around her breasts. The second one could actually be a good shot AFTER a first one from the MC's POV. You have to feel caught and a bit intimidated. The new images don't achieve that in my opinion.
View attachment 1377559
Another example? Zoe sitting on the bed. For the "older" version the room got a complete makeover. I prefered the very old version but fine. The remastered version is basically the same as the "middle" version but with different lighting, more realistic breasts and the eyes are a bit closed which makes her look more natural. But her skin looks strange in both colour and texture. And where does the green light come from? This image has been remade twice without much improvement in my opinion. I still like the first version best. Why remaster something if you don't improve it on a big scale?
View attachment 1377624
Damn, what is it with Zoey's new orange peel textured breasts? Does she has goosebumps? So many questions.What the hell. Okay, a lot of shots are from different angles now, not only POV. Can be good, the Remaster of Shut Up And Dance does this for example, and it's great there. But here? Yeah, some of the new renders are great, but does the VN really benefit from that? Look at the first time you meet Irene.
- In the very old version Irene looked great, I love that dress. However, the hallway looks like it is in a cheap rental apartment. And the bright reflection on the left is too strong.
- In the old version Irene looks slightly different, also okay. The new dress sticks to her breasts in an unnatural way, but we all know that it's hard to overcome that. The hallway looks dull but the image serves the right purpose. Irene seems cold and clever and a little but hostile, just as intended. You look her directly in the eye (hopefully).
- Now the remastered version has two images. The background and lighting change without the two characters moving, why? Was the first one not intended to be included? There are also even more artifacts around her breasts. The second one could actually be a good shot AFTER a first one from the MC's POV. You have to feel caught and a bit intimidated. The new images don't achieve that in my opinion.
View attachment 1377559
Another example? Zoe sitting on the bed. For the "older" version the room got a complete makeover. I prefered the very old version but fine. The remastered version is basically the same as the "middle" version but with different lighting, more realistic breasts and the eyes are a bit closed which makes her look more natural. But her skin looks strange in both colour and texture. And where does the green light come from? This image has been remade twice without much improvement in my opinion. I still like the first version best. Why remaster something if you don't improve it on a big scale?
View attachment 1377624
Here's a bigger sample size than just a few for those who want to see.What the hell. Okay, a lot of shots are from different angles now, not only POV. Can be good, the Remaster of Shut Up And Dance does this for example, and it's great there. But here? Yeah, some of the new renders are great, but does the VN really benefit from that? Look at the first time you meet Irene.
- In the very old version Irene looked great, I love that dress. However, the hallway looks like it is in a cheap rental apartment. And the bright reflection on the left is too strong.
- In the old version Irene looks slightly different, also okay. The new dress sticks to her breasts in an unnatural way, but we all know that it's hard to overcome that. The hallway looks dull but the image serves the right purpose. Irene seems cold and clever and a little but hostile, just as intended. You look her directly in the eye (hopefully).
- Now the remastered version has two images. The background and lighting change without the two characters moving, why? Was the first one not intended to be included? There are also even more artifacts around her breasts. The second one could actually be a good shot AFTER a first one from the MC's POV. You have to feel caught and a bit intimidated. The new images don't achieve that in my opinion.
View attachment 1377559
Another example? Zoe sitting on the bed. For the "older" version the room got a complete makeover. I prefered the very old version but fine. The remastered version is basically the same as the "middle" version but with different lighting, more realistic breasts and the eyes are a bit closed which makes her look more natural. But her skin looks strange in both colour and texture. And where does the green light come from? This image has been remade twice without much improvement in my opinion. I still like the first version best. Why remaster something if you don't improve it on a big scale?
View attachment 1377624
Thank you for that clarification. Having played through the remastered version I don't feel like this adds anything to my experience in the game so I'll ignore it.The game just got updated a couple of weeks ago. I'm doing the remaster on my own free time after I update the games with new content. This game will be updated every 6 weeks like usual.