- Aug 24, 2021
- 217
- 457
There's a lot of subtlety there so without more specifics I'm not sure what to say. For instance if they say "they will vote for the law" they should almost always vote for it. But if they say they are "likely to vote for it" or "leaning towards voting for it" it's not a sure thing. It really depends on the wording.TotalFluke I don't even bother with counselors anymore, because they never vote for the text they said they would.
In the early game, it's not an issue, but when the important laws about new services and capacity arrive, I can never make things to move on, I once managed to get all the counselors to vote the same text, and yet no text was voted because they all voted for something else with not enough votes.
Right now, trying to influence politics is just a waste of time IMO.
I've tried to make it more so that there aren't big drops (which leads to other issues like $90 drinks not making the demand go to 0). So I'm not sure what could have triggered it. There are some events that drop satisfaction quite a bit, but not to that degree (or at least no that I have seen). It's likely it's some combination of things and if your prices were high enough that maybe were near some inflection point that a tiny nudge pushed them over the edge.That is an interesting idea I gotta admit I didn't even consider.
My satisfaction went down massively, so that probably would be the reason, though I wouldn't know why. I have three fully stacked bars with two bartenders each and none of them is long-term absent (only "stairfall" I have right now is one of the managers).
Visits collapsed in the basically same way.
Gotta check the other clubs' pricing. However, they did not get any noticeable increase in their visits/earnings.
I see many games in here list a ton of tags just to cover everything so I'm not sure how much value is there to spending a lot of time on it. And a case can be made for about anything. The rape/incest are not enabled in the game and requires people to figure out how to enable it so I would not be listing those tags. Anyway, I appreciate the suggestions but it's not something I'm spending a lot of time thinking about.On a different note I considered asking the mods for an update on the tags of the game because I feel some are missing:
Anal Sex - obviously
Incest - can be activated
Rape - can be activated
Interracial - if you so choose
Gay - if you so choose
Female Protagonist - if you so choose
Text Based - since "Excel based" isn't a tag yet
Netorare - this may be bad advertising but girls can cheat on you, at least if rumors are to be believed
I would argue that the "male domination/female domination" isn't really fleshed out enough though stats for it are in the game. However, the very fact that girls can ram a dildo up male MCs will be seen by some as femdom, but I would argue against it.
Any others I am missing? And you think I got wrong?
To clarify, they abstain, which is different from being absent. They will never be absent. And abstain means that they don't really want to vote for any of the available laws. Those that abstain are the main ones you need to find a way to get rid off.not entirely either. I did that and she didn't show up to vote at all. not just 1, but all of them, and there were a lot of them. only a note that she was absent. And it didn't help me that I filled the place with my slave. Fortunately, the other three loved me so much that they voted as I wanted, only this one
They do some math to determine their chances of winning. If they are low they may just decide to leave..Interesting. Curious at what point they decide to leave it be.
If the bouncers were 20 and 20, I wonder if they'd still wanna rumble.
Am on a new slow-burn playthrough and have an entrance in the works, so will soon be able to start carrying out some testing myself.
This is not right. You can charge a cover even if you have no performers. However, you can't work a job that you don't already have an employee doing. So you can't work as a bartender until you hire a bartender. So obviously the bug is that it's letting you work as a host when there's no host employed yet.Seems that a cover charge will only apply if you have performers (currently have none).
Pre-expansion build-out:
The game will let me work as a Host and drain energy, however there's no income from it.
Thinking there should be some sort of check or the button should be hidden until charging entry becomes viable.
About to hire a host to see if it makes a difference, but if having a Host on the door still doesn't generate income, then that shouldn't be possible either. In that case, hiring a Host should be locked until a performer is hired.
For the record, I did try this with 2 sponsored commissioners and they both voted my way. I can't find why it wouldn't. However, the code that handles this was changed significantly since the last full update so it is possible that there was a bug there and got fixed by dumb luck. For that reason, the save file won't do much good either.Then it seems to be a bug. Would a save file help you to reproduce it?
What you can do, if you do have the console turned on is to check their sponsor status. Find the id of the commissioner and do a dump like this:
![1723498493320.png 1723498493320.png](https://attachments.f95zone.to/2024/08/thumb/3949828_1723498493320.png)
114 is their id, 3 is yours. I highlighted in yellow the two key values. Make sure they show appear similarly in yours. If the modifier (sponsor) is missing, then they are no longer sponsored. And if the "law_aff_..." flag is not set or is set to a value lower than 100 then it means that you didn't talk them into voting for the law.