Seems like your idea of Subverse is different from their idea of Subverse.
The fact that you wouldn't fuck a dog-fucker is absolute proof of that. It literally makes no sense why you'd have other expectations of Subverse knowing who made it. Obviously all other girls are gonna be dog-fuckers. These characters aren't "heroines." StudioFOW only does sluts and emotionally broken women.
I'll admit that their branding using the term waifu to try and get that normie appeal is cringe knowing who they are. Adding dating-sim elements where the player has to talk and date the girls is also one of the stupidest ideas they could have knowing what kind of tone they were aiming for. One of the lead creatives was in-fact AGAINST adding a dating-sim type element to the game.
Thats going into the fundamental scope problems and Subverse not knowing what it is. They didn't commit to beast or normie appeal. Their "lighter tone" nonsense may just be due to censor concerns of Gofundme and Steam, but they made the marketing push for this to be a waifu collector with a MassEffect-DragonAge style relationsim companion system built around the combat loop.
A "lead creative" being
against the basic premise a companion collector game must be relationsim focused to succeed is wew/lad retarded. Always knew it would end like this, but those are some day0 redflags they had no idea what the fuck they were doing, pitching, or sellling. Ironic at the end they have a literal "date mechanic" in a game with no relationsim about watching the girls screw monsters on your bed.
What really kills me is mantic bestiality content is ridiculously tame. Incredebly boring, even moreso than the vanilla content. The one with the attack called red rocket doesn't even have a red rocket. Every doggo-reptile dong is just a boring mammalian cylinder. No beast scene but the big anthro guy even shows un-obfuscated penetration.
Where were the creatives asking the real questions like
>why isn't the protagonist a "mantic"/alien with a giant crazy penis
when they started
Crashing your characterization and player-girl interest with the "everyone is SLUTS who fuck haha penis in vagina guys, isn't it so cool and liberated to watch them screw Mantics? Booba!" nonpersonalities to be able to accommodate player and monster CGs in the same "narrative" (by robbing all player agency) is a core design failing and main reason the "Mass effect of porn games" comes off as nothing more than a Visual Novel with some stuttery prerendered cutscenes covering loadcells.
They could have gone dark humor in tone under the radar of censorship concerns with some actual thought put into narrative design. They could have had relationsim, trainer, and master-slave elements framing archetypal girl
personalities while still accommodating narratively justified, true optional and player directed, bestiality.
For guys who made a hustle out of nonconsensual monster X videogamegirl movies they sure didn't put any effort into justifying the content of suckverse. Most of this site and this "industry" work tirelessly to hoop jump how their coercive rapegame mechanics are in fact super consensual to keep things squared with payment processors and crowdfunding, or actually go in on writing real characters with believable characterization (for a porngame) to justify their content progression.
The fact the "AAA porngame" with the markets equivalent of a starcitizen warchest put all it's eggs on "the girls are SLUTS" for literally every character, and some backers are defending it, is just comical.
You get what you deserve at a certain point.
