Ren'Py Summertime Saga [v21.0.0 wip.5258] [Kompas Productions]

[boblicticious]

Your second paragraph is akin to "I'm not saying the senator beats his wife, but I am saying I saw her wear a bandaid"
You can claim you aren't making an accusation, but your words say different.

Also, you feel the need to state something false in your attempt to show validity in your statements. The progress tracker was less than 60% near the end of October 2021, 63% in December 2021, and is now at 69%. It hasn't sat in the "upper 60% for a year", like you protest. It has gained almost 10% (double the rate you state) in the past year. That is still slow, so why the need to exaggerate when you claim you aren't accusing?

Just so you know, the first link you posted was to a post where someone was proclaiming the game itself would soon be 60% done (meaning 60% of the way to full completion, this wasn't a reference to the progress tracker's tech update completion percentage). The 2nd link may or may not be accurate... to be honest I'm going from memory from the last few times I checked the tracker from over a year ago (at which time I'm relatively certain it was sitting at 65%) and it's possible that I've confused myself... I'd be more trusting of this particular (63%) post as a solid recording of what the percentage actually was at the time if they had just said what the percentage was instead of saying a range of 60-63% (suggesting that they weren't actually looking at the tracker).

To address your first point, we can each come to our own conclusion how significant this lengthy a delay might be. Some people might look at the marked lack of progress and find a better analogy would be a senator with a small laceration on their knuckle standing next to their wife with a black eye possibly indicates he's beating her... Going hyperbolically obvious or exceedingly subtle with the analogy doesn't prove a point, it just betrays our opinion on how meaningful the evidence is to us personally.

 

[Count Morado]

Going hyperbolically obvious or exceedingly subtle with the analogy doesn't prove a point, it just betrays our opinion on how meaningful the evidence is to us personally.

You're projecting. While I'm a fan of hyperbole - everything I have put forth has been based upon as accurate statements as I can find at the time I am typing them. I cannot state the same for you.

On the other hand, you have provided nothing but your memory and figure of the situation - with no documented evidence to back it up. If anyone is betraying using opinion, it is yourself.

I have put forth information, would be glad to continue if you wish to continue, yourself - but first I ask you submit a couple actual pieces of evidence other than your hypotheses and recollections.

EDIT: Oh, and you're right, I linked the wrong post with that 60%, my apologies. Here's a post referencing it was at 57% in October after a couple of months at 50%. So the progress has actually gone up about 12% in 6 months, not the 10% I stated earlier. Still, it goes to disproving your claim at being in the high 60% for about a year.

EDIT2: and I just saw your hyperbolic dig with the senator having a scrape on his knuckle and his wife's black eye ... again exaggerating what was presented in order for you to attempt to make an unsupported claim.

EDIT3: Progress Chart at 47% in August 21 from 43% in July 21 - not even in the lower 60%. (was editing while you posted the following)

 

[boblicticious]

So the entire "DC is a milker cause reasons" argument stems from a tracker known to be hot garbage got stuck on the ever increasing # of junk to re-do for months ? How empty and devoid of most anything valid of argumentation can you get ? At least the tyical milker's "DC makes ~80k a month, therefore the game should have been finished 3 years ago" has some basis in reality

If you don't find it suggestive, that's fine. I'm not going to be upset in the least to be proven conclusively that the team is indeed hard at work and the tech update is indeed impending. I tried to make it pretty clear (by saying it 3 times) that I'm not asserting that milking is taking place, just that I can see why some people suspect that it is. The real point of my post was to point out irrelevancies in certain arguments trying to prove that the team couldn't possibly be milking their patreon. I can understand why many people take that to mean I'm asserting that I think the delays are intentional... but that's why I posted the disclaimer (3 times) that I'm not making that asssertion.

 

[Count Morado]

If you don't find it suggestive, that's fine. I'm not going to be upset in the least to be proven conclusively that the team is indeed hard at work and the tech update is indeed impending. I tried to make it pretty clear (by saying it 3 times) that I'm not asserting that milking is taking place, just that I can see why some people suspect that it is. The real point of my post was to point out irrelevancies in certain arguments trying to prove that the team couldn't possibly be milking their patreon. I can understand why many people take that to mean I'm asserting that I think the delays are intentional... but that's why I posted the disclaimer (3 times) that I'm not making that asssertion.

And you continue to do the same over and over again of stating that "I'm not asserting that milking is taking place... [but] just that I can see ..."

You continue to hedge instead of just stating that "you aren't asserting" and be done with it.
And again, the burden of proof is on the person making the assertion - which has yet to be done by anyone claiming or hinting or seeing how one could understand why someone would think that there is anything malicious being done by the developer to "milk" people who freely, without duress, decide to donate. Without proof of a claim, there is no validity to the claim outside just being whiny Karens.

 

[boblicticious]

You're projecting. While I'm a fan of hyperbole - everything I have put forth has been based upon as accurate statements as I can find at the time I am typing them. I cannot state the same for you.

On the other hand, you have provided nothing but your memory and figure of the situation - with no documented evidence to back it up. If anyone is betraying using opinion, it is yourself.

I have put forth information, would be glad to continue if you wish to continue, yourself - but first I ask you submit a couple actual pieces of evidence other than your hypotheses and recollections.

EDIT: Oh, and you're right, I linked the wrong post with that 60%, my apologies. Here's a post referencing it was at 57% in October after a couple of months at 50%. So the progress has actually gone up about 12% in 6 months, not the 10% I stated earlier. Still, it goes to disproving your claim at being in the high 60% for about a year.

EDIT2: and I just saw your hyperbolic dig with the senator having a scrape on his knuckle and his wife's black eye ... again exaggerating what was presented in order for you to attempt to make an unsupported claim.

What is it you think I'm projecting specifically? I'll have to go back and read my posts again but I'm relatively certain I didn't post any analogies to try to make a point (at least not prior to throwing my own interpretation on top of your senator beating his wife analogy). The point I was making is that the analogy you made and the analogy I made are customized to portray a level of significance to the evidence as opposed to actually proving a point. So maybe you read a little bit too much into my statement about hyperbolically obvious versus exceedingly subtle, it wasn't a statement about any other thing you said than to describe how the wife beating senator analogy only serves to express how much value you place on the significance of the delays.

 

[Count Morado]

What is it you think I'm projecting specifically? I'll have to go back and read my posts again but I'm relatively certain I didn't post any analogies to try to make a point (at least not prior to throwing my own interpretation on top of your senator beating his wife analogy). The point I was making is that the analogy you made and the analogy I made are customized to portray a level of significance to the evidence as opposed to actually proving a point. So maybe you read a little bit too much into my statement about hyperbolically obvious versus exceedingly subtle, it wasn't a statement about any other thing you said than to describe how the wife beating senator analogy only serves to express how much value you place in the delays.

You realize I'm enjoying this little tete a tete (though in public). It is obvious to see you took one simple analogy and ramped it up with exaggeration to "not make any assertion" to your claim.
You've not made any points. You have only talked in circles and used hyperbole and false memories and inaccuracies.

 

[boblicticious]

And you continue to do the same over and over again of stating that "I'm not asserting that milking is taking place... [but] just that I can see ..."

You continue to hedge instead of just stating that "you aren't asserting" and be done with it.
And again, the burden of proof is on the person making the assertion - which has yet to be done by anyone claiming or hinting or seeing how one could understand why someone would think that there is anything malicious being done by the developer to "milk" people who freely, without duress, decide to donate. Without proof of a claim, there is no validity to the claim outside just being whiny Karens.

The point is, the discussion has moved in a direction I wasn't trying to take it. My point was to specifically point out how irrelevant some arguments were, and the responses to me have been to try to disprove what I already explicitly said I wasn't asserting. If you want to go back to my initial couple of posts and directly address my arguments against one or two posts trying to defend the developer's honor, we can probably have a more productive discussion... but insofar as defending a position of the "milking scamlord" theory being real, that was never my intention. I can see scrolling back that many of you have been tirelessly arguing against the idea for months. And I can understand why someone coming in here with any kind of post coming accross as support for that viewpoint is going to twang that nerve. But I'm not the Karen you are looking for.

 

[Omnikuken]

Just to add some more fuel to this majestic dumpster fire : tech build started in March 2021. In what way, shape or form can any1 claim the tracker has been anything close to "60% for more than year" when we barely made it past that time mark 3 weeks ago ? Unless you wanna go back further into wack-zone and claim it was for the last part of main route, which in turn is still wrong since they were doing bugtesting and the tracker was around 99% for about a month

 

[boblicticious]

You realize I'm enjoying this little tete a tete (though in public). It is obvious to see you took one simple analogy and ramped it up with exaggeration to "not make any assertion" to your claim.
You've not made any points. You have only talked in circles and used hyperbole and false memories and inaccuracies.

I wouldn't keep engaging if I weren't enjoying it too. Are you legitimately trying to suggest that you think your initial analogy with the bandaid is an objective representation of the significance of the development speed?

 

[boblicticious]

Just to add some more fuel to this majestic dumpster fire : tech build started in March 2021. In what way, shape or form can any1 claim the tracker has been anything close to "60% for more than year" when we barely made it past that time mark 3 weeks ago ? Unless you wanna go back further into wack-zone and claim it was for the last part of main route, which in turn is still wrong since they were doing bugtesting and the tracker was around 99% for about a month

I see your point. I should have done more investigating before I pulled out values based on memory. The last version I have installed is .20.5 that's from 7/2020. After that point the discussion came up that a tech update including the aspect ratio change was forthcoming. That's when I decided to stop playing the game until the tech update was out with the better aspect ratio. My mistake was assuming that they started on it directly after .20.5 since I've been mostly ignoring STS until the release of the tech update. It's likely that the time I viewed the progress tracker over a year ago and saw it in the high 60's was for a version before they started on the tech update.

 

[Count Morado]

The point is, the discussion has moved in a direction I wasn't trying to take it. My point was to specifically point out how irrelevant some arguments were, and the responses to me have been to try to disprove what I already explicitly said I wasn't asserting. If you want to go back to my initial couple of posts and directly address my arguments against one or two posts trying to defend the developer's honor, we can probably have a more productive discussion... but insofar as defending a position of the "milking scamlord" theory being real, that was never my intention. I can see scrolling back that many of you have been tirelessly arguing against the idea for months. And I can understand why someone coming in here with any kind of post coming accross as support for that viewpoint is going to twang that nerve. But I'm not the Karen you are looking for.

This discussion has only moved because you have changed the target - now we're back to the beginning:
No one was defending the developer's honor.

• In your assertion that you aren't making the claim, but you can see how others could - you are lending credence and credibility to a claim which has no evidence to support it.
• At the same time, you were stating that anyone contradicting the claim had no basis.
• To whit, I reminded you that it is not the people who contradict who have the burden of proof but, rather, the ones making the initial claim.
• You then proceded in your 'nonassertion' to say you could see their case because your memory shows the progress chart has been stuck in the high 60% for a year. -- though still swearing you're not making the claim, but seeing how others could take it that way.
• I showed at least one link (and one miscopied) to show your 60% memory was in err.
• You doubled down you weren't making that assertion, but could see how others could about milking.
• I stated that using that kind of language is akin to making an accusation of domestic violence without any proof except for a wife wearing a bandaid (I said not where - you then created a laceration on the senator's hand and a blackeye on the wife, using hyperbole to continue your "nonassertion").
• In response I linked to proof for December, October, August, and July that showed your memory was wrong.
• Instead of saying you were mistaken, you continued your belief that progress is slower than shown and again you weren't making any assertion of milking, but could see how others could see it as so.

Now you're trying to make the claim the change in direction and derail of the topic wasn't yours. But you can plainly see, you had the wheel, but may not have been keeping an eye on where you were going.

And follow that with your misunderstanding of what the analogy was. It's not toward the developer's progress - it was toward your continued statement that while you make no assertion that the developer is milking, you see how others could see it so. When no one making that claim can show any evidence to back that claim - which is their burden of proof. If you need help, here's the diagram of the two thoughts:

You: I'm not asserting that milking is taking place,
Me: I'm not saying the senator beats his wife,

You: just that I can see why some people suspect that it is.
Me: I'm just saying I saw his wife wearing a bandaid.

It's a pretty straightforward comparison. If you only stated your first phrase, it would be obvious of your intent. But by adding the second clause, you are making a completely different statement.

 

[SCynic]

The biggest issue I can see regarding people's opinion (and it IS opinion, not verifiable fact) that there is "milking" going on is that people seem to believe that the tasks involved are all simple, easily formatted and taken care of, and form a nice, neat and most importantly, DIRECT progression when it comes to reporting how far along they are. They really aren't taking into account that fixing someone else's work is ALWAYS a pain in the ass, more complex and difficult that you believe it is going to be, and takes longer than you assume before you actually get into it.

It's strange that so many people overlook this, especially considering that most people have had to do this at work or some other place. You gotta figure what is where and why, and almost read the mind and thought processes of the person who came before you. "Why the FUCK did he put THIS over HERE!?" is a sentence that you will ALWAYS hear when handling this sort of project.

Then, apply this to coding. It might be a specific coding language, but no two coders write the same, or patch bugs the same. Compare it to speaking english. No two speakers will EVER say the same sentence the same way. You have accent, regional dialects, slang, syntax and sentence structure, not to mention one person may just have a better understanding of the language. I am NOT surprised its taking this long, and I think progress has actually been fairly quick.

Who;s to say the new coder has had situations where they finish a bunch, move on and see some fuckery, and have to GO BACK and adjust things. But then again, you cant count on people in this thread to READ the first page, full of faqs and links to answers to most any question they might have. Expecting them to use their brains regarding the situation is just asking for disappointment.

 

[Omnikuken]

Expecting about 10 pages to get nuked in the coming minutes

 

[Count Morado]

Expecting about 10 pages to get nuked in the coming minutes

I was just thinking that myself!
(but I did update my FAQ to include what progress bar percentages I now know - oh and the reason why it went down to 69% from 70% is because *drumroll* they added one more writing task: total for the progress went from 301 to 302 -- just what we had suspected)

 

[boblicticious]

This discussion has only moved because you have changed the target - now we're back to the beginning:
No one was defending the developer's honor.

• In your assertion that you aren't making the claim, but you can see how others could - you are lending credence and credibility to a claim which has no evidence to support it.
• At the same time, you were stating that anyone contradicting the claim had no basis.
• To whit, I reminded you that it is not the people who contradict who have the burden of proof but, rather, the ones making the initial claim.
• You then proceded in your 'nonassertion' to say you could see their case because your memory shows the progress chart has been stuck in the high 60% for a year. -- though still swearing you're not making the claim, but seeing how others could take it that way.
• I showed at least one link (and one miscopied) to show your 60% memory was in err.
• You doubled down you weren't making that assertion, but could see how others could about milking.
• I stated that using that kind of language is akin to making an accusation of domestic violence without any proof except for a wife wearing a bandaid (I said not where - you then created a laceration on the senator's hand and a blackeye on the wife, using hyperbole to continue your "nonassertion").
• In response I linked to proof for December, October, August, and July that showed your memory was wrong.
• Instead of saying you were mistaken, you continued your belief that progress is slower than shown and again you weren't making any assertion of milking, but could see how others could see it as so.

Now you're trying to make the claim the change in direction and derail of the topic wasn't yours. But you can plainly see, you had the wheel, but may not have been keeping an eye on where you were going.

And follow that with your misunderstanding of what the analogy was. It's not toward the developer's progress - it was toward your continued statement that while you make no assertion that the developer is milking, you see how others could see it so. When no one making that claim can show any evidence to back that claim - which is their burden of proof. If you need help, here's the diagram of the two thoughts:

You: I'm not asserting that milking is taking place,
Me: I'm not saying the senator beats his wife,

You: just that I can see why some people suspect that it is.
Me: I'm just saying I saw his wife wearing a bandaid.

It's a pretty straightforward comparison. If you only stated your first phrase, it would be obvious of your intent. But by adding the second clause, you are making a completely different statement.

Well I've already discovered and admintted that I was wrong about the versioning. It obviously goes a long way to change my perspective of the development speed. But I do still stand by my evaluation of the analogy. Your analogy was designed to make it sound absurd that I could see why some people suspect the developer, comparing it to assuming that a woman wearing a bandaid must be suffering domestic abuse. But if I truly believed at the time I posted it that the progress had only gone up 5% in over a year, would you honestly find it as absurd that I can see why some people suspect foul play as someone assuming a lady wearing a bandaid must be getting abused at home?

 

[Count Morado]

Well I've already discovered and admintted that I was wrong about the versioning. It obviously goes a long way to change my perspective of the development speed. But I do still stand by my evaluation of the analogy. Your analogy was designed to make it sound absurd that I could see why some people suspect the developer, comparing it to assuming that a woman wearing a bandaid must be suffering domestic abuse. But if I truly believed at the time I posted it that the progress had only gone up 5% in over a year, would you honestly find it as absurd that I can see why some people suspect foul play as someone assuming a lady wearing a bandaid must be getting abused at home?

Yes, I do find it absurd - because neither assumptions utilize any actual bases of facts. They both are making assumptions without actually looking into the evidence, first. And that's the whole point. People aren't actually looking at facts, but making assertions without support. A bandaid is no evidence of anything (again, not stated where - and you never asked, you assumed because it is mentioned that it had merit). A memory is no evidence of anything. Memories fade and can be faulty.

Now, If I had stated I saw the bandaid on her pinky - would that added bit of information change your perspective? Of course it would. Absent that data - you made assumptions which more likely, than not, are invalid. That's why the burden of proof on claims is on the person making them. There is no evidence to back up the claims by people who argue the developer milks. To say "I can see how they think it so" only fills their mind that they are right (and moves those on the fence to an indefensible, yet obstinate, position).

But I do appreciate you state you do see you were mistaken on the progress bar. Thank you.

 

[boblicticious]

Yes, I do find it absurd - because neither assumptions utilize any actual bases of facts. They both are making assumptions without actually looking into the evidence, first. And that's the whole point. People aren't actually looking at facts, but making assertions without support. A bandaid is no evidence of anything (again, not stated where - and you never asked, you assumed because it is mentioned that it had merit). A memory is no evidence of anything. Memories fade and can be faulty.

Now, If I had stated I saw the bandaid on her pinky - would that added bit of information change your perspective? Of course it would. Absent that data - you made assumptions which more likely, than not, are invalid. That's why the burden of proof on claims is on the person making them. There is no evidence to back up the claims by people who argue the developer milks. To say "I can see how they think it so" only fills their mind that they are right (and moves those on the fence to an indefensible, yet obstinate, position).

But I do appreciate you state you do see you were mistaken on the progress bar. Thank you.

I'm eating crow for the mistake I made, but looking back at my posts I think I was being fairly reasonable.

 

[poopfartshitcum]

cmon man, dc milkers vs defenders again cmon yall there's no point just let the other person think what they think

 

[poopfartshitcum]

i honestly think dc made a bad call pushing for the tech update, i think he underestimated how much time it would take ( like he does with every update, but way worse this time ), should have saved it for until the game was nearly complete or atleast better planned and communicated it with his team and with the audience

 

[Count Morado]

cmon man, dc milkers vs defenders again cmon yall there's no point just let the other person think what they think

i honestly think dc made a bad call pushing for the tech update, i think he underestimated how much time it would take ( like he does with every update, but way worse this time ), should have saved it for until the game was nearly complete or atleast better planned and communicated it with his team and with the audience