- Jan 10, 2018
- 8,074
- 16,654
Then you could have waited for sex with Vicky until next update when it would have made more sense or you could have given a breakup option earlier in the update if wanted and then you could also have stopped saying MC now did it with Vicky a few hours after that call. That was a choice dev team made. Now I think the Vicky sex does make sense, see it as a sort of breakup sex from a hurt MC after that call that was forced into an open relationship.there is no cheating - so they has to "pause" their relationship before he met Vicky - or there would have been no sex with Vicky
Come on we know the reason why MC is allowed to play the field is because no dev team in this world is able to develop monthly or 2 monthly updates including different sex scenes with 8 different ladies or more, so either you let play MC around a bit or there will be 4 or more updates between sex with any given female. Strongly cutting down on potential sex partners from start would help with that, but that is not what the team chose. So calling MC a hypocrite or players for a design choice by devs .....
Same as the sharing of D in DMD, as far as I know F shares his bisexual D with every one of his female affairs and every one of his affairs with D if has them. Now i do not see it happen that F will get a nice BJ from Marcus or plows him deep in his asshole while Marcus has sex with D. What is good for the goose is good for the gander, right. If D shares in F's conquest so should F in D's. Fair is fair after all and makes it a lot less vanilla as just D having sex with other males.
Last edited: