- Thread starter BabyYoda
- Start date
Not sure exactly, but he's said in Discord the update will drop this month.
- Jun 18, 2022
- 282
- 783
It's been a long time since I last picked up this game. I stopped at episode 12 since it is the season one finale and I am about to start Season 2 then stopping at episode 18 to treat it as a mid season finale. However, im a bit rusty with the lore and kinda forgot some plot details since it's been ages. Can anyone give me a tldr of the important bits I need to know again? Mostly the prophecy stuff and the Scoulgin (completely forgot who they are or what they look like)
Last edited:
- Dec 27, 2017
- 5,787
- 19,895
Since the game has an exhaustive CODEX, you can find all that stuff out yourself without having to replay the whole game.
- Feb 23, 2020
- 831
- 1,560
Also be sure to have played the version 0.12b or later. If you played 0.12a you did not reach the end of season one. There has been a lot of post simply pointing that out when season 2 came out. people skipped 0.12b thinking it was a bugfix update.
- Jun 18, 2022
- 282
- 783
I finished playing season 1 around when season 2 episode 16 or 17 was in development iirc. Did the version I have then already include the 0.12b update? Cause if not, I guess i'll be reinstalling season 1 again unfortunately
- Feb 23, 2020
- 831
- 1,560
You are good. Don't sweat it. Your comment about having played Season 1 a long Time ago made me want to ere on the Side of cotion. Enjoy the Game to your Heart content.
- Jun 18, 2022
- 282
- 783
Man looking like a letter T with serifs lmao
- Apr 26, 2017
- 13,261
- 19,741
Wait is that his skin color? I confess that i don't remember it. He looks kinda inhuman there. 
- Apr 26, 2017
- 13,261
- 19,741
- Nov 20, 2017
- 4,984
- 12,136
Only that Subscriberstar isn't without any issue. Eg. no paypal is an issue to a few. Also they have the almost same TOS regarding
You must be registered to see the links
, so...
Last edited:
It's interesting that unlike Patreon, SubscribeStar doesn't define what they consider incest, leaving it a bit more open to interpretation.
In either case, it's probably worth remembering that Patreon really only started cracking down on it because their payment processors pressured them to do so. SubscribeStar probably isn't immune to this either depending on who their payment processors are, but may not be attracting as much attention, at least for now.
Edit: I get a bit of a kick out of Patreon's guidelines regarding incest also.
So no fictional incest between blood relatives or immediate family... unless it's a "plot point" of a "larger narrative." Totally nothing arbitrary about this permitted exception.
Last edited:
- Apr 26, 2017
- 13,261
- 19,741
Subscribestar does not use paypal, so there is less danger of them starting a witch hunt over it. After all it was this payment processor corp that forced p@tr3on's hand.
I thought this was the case, but couldn't remember for sure if it was PayPal or one of the other payment processors that really pushed them.
- Jul 5, 2022
- 506
- 937
why did paypal decide they would be arbiter of morality in media?
Simply put, it's primarily a business, liability, and public image decision.
On the business side, the adult entertainment industry has a relatively high charge-back rate on things like credit cards. Essentially, imagine some conservative minister or sometime signs up to some kink site without their wife knowing. Those charges will show up on your card. Usually it's changed to look innocuous, but if it's brought up they might deny signing up. "Honestly honey, I have no idea how 'Backdoor Sluts 9' showed up on our card! It must be fraud!"
So then they're calling the card or payment processor and requesting a charge-back because the charge is clearly fraudulent. They're a moral God-fearing family, not deviants! So the company issues a charge-back because it's not worth the effort or business risk to argue with the customer.
Now for a number of reasons, most adult sites use third-party payment processors. It costs the third -party processor money each time they issue a charge-back between the customer and credit card companies. Also, if they accumulate too many of them, the actual card companies like VISA might suspend their merchant agreement. So instead the third-party payment processor like PayPal or Stripe limit what content is allowed for their payments to lower-risk content both to reduce costs and reduce the risk of their agreement being suspended.
From the liability standpoint, payment processors can be potentially found legally liable if the content is illegal in the jurisdiction of the customer. And the type of content that is legal can vary wildly on an international scale. As such, some companies that operate in many jurisdictions effectively limit their content based on the most restrictive laws rather than take the time, effort, and cost to tailor their content policy to each jurisdiction and verify the location of each customer.
Lastly, from a public image perspective, being seen socially as supporting "immoral" content and industries is bad for their stock holders and bottom line. And I'm sure many high-up people at these payment or credit card companies don't want their neighbors or family to see them as working at an immoral company either. So there's further pushback there.
TL;DR: PayPal's decision is almost wholly driven by money and not wanting to anger or have legal trouble from even the most prudish corners of society.
Anyways, rant over.
Last edited:
- Jun 29, 2024
- 95
- 258
TL;DR:
Financing international terrorism is cool.
Financing incest in fictional settings is not cool.
Pretty much. I guess there's fewer charge-backs from international terrorists?
Edit: I mostly joke. Honestly, it's more likely that people making fictional incest porn care about their livelihoods more so don't take the same risks by doing things outside guidelines.
Last edited: