Others Completed The Agnietta ~Healer and the Cursed Dungeon~ [v1.05] [B-flat]

4.30 star(s) 79 Votes
Discussion Reviews (79)
W

Whotfisthis

Well-Known Member
May 30, 2021
1,105
920
Normally uncensored versions would have [uncen] in the file name
Would try to open it to see if the plugins work but I don't have access to PC atm and it won't open on my phone
 
W

WhiteFireDaemon

Active Member
Mar 14, 2017
768
1,047
MarshmallowCasserole said:
Sorry... WHAT?

Where can I read more of this?
Click to expand...
I can't remember where I heard the story, but there was someone talking about how Patreon was demanding access to their personal storage to check to make sure they weren't creating content that they didn't like. It was basically Patreon saying that the artist wasn't allowed to even make content that Patreon didn't like regardless of what they did with it. Even if it was being sold outside of Patreon or perhaps just for personal use, Patreon still wanted to look through all their personal files to make sure they weren't making content that Patreon didn't approve of. It's probably a one off story, but there's a ton of stories about Patreon running things with questionable and very very vague rules. Even the rules they do have are very selectively applied to allow users they like and ban the ones they don't which often results in a very distinct and obvious political bias.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Banshee96, f9account, MarshmallowCasserole and 4 others
A

Aeri Rerum

Newbie
Jan 2, 2019
60
35
I'm going to ask the same question as the person above me, but comprehensibly this time.

Does the current version (0.94) ship with uncensor/bug-fix patch? If not, does that patch still work with the new update? Also, what about the mod?

Thank you!

EDIT: I am downloading and will experiment if nobody knows.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sheerley and Abbe822
U

Urka

Newbie
May 25, 2017
28
21
WhiteFireDaemon said:
I can't remember where I heard the story, but there was someone talking about how Patreon was demanding access to their personal storage to check to make sure they weren't creating content that they didn't like. It was basically Patreon saying that the artist wasn't allowed to even make content that Patreon didn't like regardless of what they did with it. Even if it was being sold outside of Patreon or perhaps just for personal use, Patreon still wanted to look through all their personal files to make sure they weren't making content that Patreon didn't approve of. It's probably a one off story, but there's a ton of stories about Patreon running things with questionable and very very vague rules. Even the rules they do have are very selectively applied to allow users they like and ban the ones they don't which often results in a very distinct and obvious political bias.
Click to expand...
Freedom and Democracy. Protection of private property and information. How hypocritical.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
4.30 star(s) 79 Votes