- Jan 3, 2018
- 4,915
- 10,323
I never once made a comparison between numbers of victims and invading someone's privacy.LOL My point" of what you quoted" was its nonsensical to talk about killing numbers between cold blooded killers and invading someone's privacy with video and audio or just audio.
It was a perfectly valid analogy, not a comparison. There is nothing nonsensical about it.
You not being able to see the sense, does not mean that it does not contain any.
I made a comparison between 2 high numbers of murders & the fact that the punishment is the same, regardless.
It doesn't make any difference if they killed 10, or 20.
Both get the death sentence, or both spend the rest of their natural lives in prison.
I made this as an analogy, because it's the same premise. It's just more extreme.
I think you're stuck on comparing audio and video, treat them independently.
Once you've chosen, whichever one you went with, the other is no longer a consideration anyway.
If you chose audio then, to them, there is no video. So there is no "audio is not as bad".
Audio is plenty bad enough in its own right & that's what it will be judged on. Utterly regardless of video being worse.
For a moment, forget all about the existence of video.
Now, take the scenario where you placed the audio and got caught listening in to some private stuff, business or personal.
You're going to get executed, as a result.
Or, disregarding audio, you place video & get caught.
You're going to get executed, as a result.
So the end result is still the same, same as it is for 10, or 20 murders. Hence the analogy.
Which is precisely why I'm saying that the actual choice is a false dilemma anyway, it's inconsequential.
It's Hobson's Choice.
Last edited: