- Dec 1, 2019
- 8,774
- 14,891
You're correct, these are your impressions and it is perfectly fine to share them - others may have the same views about this game. And they may be helped by it. E. g. if somebody wants a "fuckfest", this game isn't for them.
However, while these are your impressions, I'd like to argue two points and question a third.
Let's argue first:
(1) In my opinion, update time has nothing to do with update quality, and I think reviews should be based on quality alone. After all, once this game is finished, nobody playing it cares about how long it took.
(2) When you talk about the new contract sytem you dislike (which is perfectly fine) you argue that "very, very few" people would like it. This somewhat clashes with what was said in this thread - I've seen quite a few people like it and consider it an improvement. That doesn't mean that you or anybody else has to like it, the 1 star can still stand, however I find it a bit misleading to claim some kind of majority here. Same for the "Let's all be honest" part referring to the same issue.
My question:
(3) How did you come to the conclusion that a mafia game with capos going all the way from rollerblading, via flail wearing, to pretending to be karate nuns; a game with toddlers tormenting a poor Wilfred; a game with off hand dialogue about ice cream is taking itself "so seriously"? - I mean, you can still slam it: not well done, not fitting the mood, too many emotional ups and downs to be coherent, absolutely unfunny, incoherent characters, so again I do not want to diminish your 1 star conclusion - this is your opinion and as valid as anybody else's - but I do not get how you come out of this game and consider it taking itself seriously.
Last edited:
