Gracie: (when MC narrows his eye at her looking at her attire) Oh stop looking at me like that! Unlike you, my intention is pure. This is purely for study, for me to learn.lol yeah, see through blouse and short denim skirt is definitely more nightclub/party girl wear.
Not sure how Gracie's managed to self justify the decency aspect, here, tbh.
Ha ha ha, yeah, I'm with you & definitely opting for "a bit of both"!Gracie: (when MC narrows his eye at her looking at her attire) Oh stop looking at me like that! Unlike you, my intention is pure. This is purely for study, for me to learn.
If she says that, I don't know whether she actually believes that, or she thinks otherwise and is trying to be in denial (perhaps a bit of both, heh).
MC responds: Your intent is only pure, if the subject matter of your study is, also.Gracie: (when MC narrows his eye at her looking at her attire) Oh stop looking at me like that! Unlike you, my intention is pure. This is purely for study, for me to learn.
I would say "nice ass", but opinions are of course subjectiveBadass
Next she'll be surfing on a jet.
For the next class, please calculate the velocity of the bullets, using Newtonian and Einsteinian laws of motion.
Well unless something really weird is going on, her bullets will be << c. Speaking of weird, is it just me or does it look like she's got a 'shoot the whole bullet' thing going on à la Portal?For the next class, please calculate the velocity of the bullets, using Newtonian and Einsteinian laws of motion.
Yes, the two values should be very close. The Einsteinian calculation would have the bullets going slightly slower (very very very ... slightly slower), but would also be slightly more massive to conserve momentum. A rough calculation places the difference as somewhere around one in ten million (1/10,000,000). Sorry, nerd brain.Well unless something really weird is going on, her bullets will be << c. Speaking of weird, is it just me or does it look like she's got a 'shoot the whole bullet' thing going on à la Portal?
I didn't check now, but that's way more of a difference than I would have expected actually ...Yes, the two values should be very close. The Einsteinian calculation would have the bullets going slightly slower (very very very ... slightly slower), but would also be slightly more massive to conserve momentum. A rough calculation places the difference as somewhere around one in ten million (1/10,000,000). Sorry, nerd brain.
Not sure what capering means in this context. Sorry.For the picture, I can say that it depend a lot on the actual capering. It is possible to freeze, even bullets, completely in time.
So I don't see the issue here.
Yes, if the flames were exiting the barrel, they should flare out toward the bullet. As it appears right now, they are flaring out from the bullet. I figure it would be difficult to find a model of the pistol in that part of the cycle. Would be a nice touch if one could add it.The other two points (bullet jacket and flames) I agree. Also the pistols would needed to eject the jacket and therefore a part of the pistols need to be move back, so the jacket actually could be ejected.
Probably not significant. I think her downward acceleration due to gravity would not be significantly changed by the upward force of the kick-back. It might cause her to drift backwards in the horizontal a bit.For my nerd mode, how high would be the recoil force and how much would it have an influence over the gravitational force that Luna is exposed to.
Works for me!well to explain my idea there Luna shoots Mini Rockets from her Mini rocket launcher guns