Disagree. "Rules for thee but not for me" seems to be incredibly on brand for people who purport to believe in "traditional values".Hehehe well... I understand what you mean but, words matter and I don't think you mean exactly what you said. If so, then by having sex with both Nicole and Allison, the author has already put MC in opposition to the very ideals he is promoting. No, I don't think he cares about the institution of marriage so much as the idea of a committed relationship - even if that relationship is a non-traditional one. I'm OK with agreeing to disagree. But, I also felt a need to point at some unfair biases that were starting to develop over a single issue. As I said, IMHO.
The rules only don't apply to the MC. Everyone else who engages in premarital sex is killed off faster than the black dude in a slasher film
I agree with this as well. No where have I said the game is actually bad. I actually think the story is pretty good with some solid concepts at work. It tackles tough topics and there are points in the story where the writing actively engages the reader by addressing questions the story is posing.Exactly right. The special circumstances of the viral infection in combination with the conflicted MC over traditional concepts of strict monogamy were meant (I think) to promote the evolution of an open dialogue rather than present a bigoted opinion. I guess we'll find out as the story progresses.
I was impressed at the bit of dialogue where Allison goes "I think its time to address the elephant in the room" and the MC responds "Yeah me too. I'm starting to wonder why nobody seems particularly stressed over this.....extinction-level catastrophe that could potentially happen with this sterility plague and why it seems to be occurring in this secret underground lair my dad had built"
Yes game, I was actually beginning to wonder that as well. I, the reader, also have several questions.
Last edited: