- Apr 22, 2017
- 1,065
- 1,692
Do you REALLY want to know what math (mathematics) is?
Looky here...
You must be registered to see the links
It's not just "numbers"...
Looky here...
It's not just "numbers"...
- Apr 7, 2021
- 343
- 1,219
I'm sure you think that way, but you're still wrong. Versions can be letters, numbers, names, dates, or a combination of any of them; in most cases, you see them as numbers, which is easier for people to understand, but at the end, it's what the developer chooses to use to signify a change in the project, such as software or any other project that can be altered or modified.
- Aug 12, 2022
- 2,320
- 2,545
to be clear
after 0.99 put 0.100 is wrong
and this was my first replay to this post
https://f95zone.to/threads/the-office-wife-v0-90-public-j-s-deacon.44541/post-12718641
I'm on Mac version 12.x.x and versions are always in progress... LETTERS CAN BE USED IN MATH!
but this game has a specific numerical version type that do not included letters!
after a DOT it is impossible to use 0.100 bc is the same as 0.1!!! in math!
if after version 0.10.0 you write version 0.10.1 is correct but version numbering with three or more dots x.x.x should start from the first version to avoid confusion.
but is this game included?
we was talking about the versions numbering of this game
and after 0.99 the version 0.100 is mathematically wrong!
after v0.99 the v1.0 is correct and it doesn't have to be the final version of the game..
the game can continue with version 1.01 and so on! (if required)
obviously version 10.x.x.x is mathematically correct too...
but this numeration type is not used in this game!
so while letters are fine in a general sense--this game never used them!
or only used them to make x.x fixed versions
Last edited:
- Jul 22, 2020
- 403
- 1,874
If you saw version 0.9
Version 10.5 does not mean "Version 10 and a half". It means Major version 10, Minor version 5. This is the way software versioning works. Decent Monkey was correct - version 0.10 is after version 0.9, and 0.10 is different to 0.1.
You can have a third number, indicating a patch release: 1.2.3 is a valid software version (major release 1, minor release 2, path release 3), but I hope you can agree that 1.2.3 is not a valid number. If you go "About XXX" on software you are using, you will sometimes see version 10.5 which looks like a decimal number, but just indicates a major and minor version with no patch release.
But you will also see the 3 version form too. Try it yourself. Here my "About this Mac" on the Macbook I am typing this on:
GIMP -> About
Visual Studio Code -> About
etc etc
You are misunderstanding what the numbers mean. The dot is not a decimal point, it is a separator between two numbers.
Version 10.5 does not mean "Version 10 and a half". It means Major version 10, Minor version 5. This is the way software versioning works. Decent Monkey was correct - version 0.10 is after version 0.9, and 0.10 is different to 0.1.
You can have a third number, indicating a patch release: 1.2.3 is a valid software version (major release 1, minor release 2, path release 3), but I hope you can agree that 1.2.3 is not a valid number. If you go "About XXX" on software you are using, you will sometimes see version 10.5 which looks like a decimal number, but just indicates a major and minor version with no patch release.
But you will also see the 3 version form too. Try it yourself. Here my "About this Mac" on the Macbook I am typing this on:
GIMP -> About
Visual Studio Code -> About
etc etc
- Dec 23, 2018
- 607
- 2,553
Windows 95 would like to have a word...
OMG NO ONE CARES.
Absolutely. Most irrelevant convo ever. Zzzzz....
- Jul 22, 2020
- 403
- 1,874
To be honest, it started off relevant: does The Office Wife's being on v0.90 mean there's only 10% left?
But it then became the second most enjoyable thing on the internet, after porn: correcting someone who was wrong
At least this discussion is only necessary during ~75% of the year, then we'll get 3 months of peace while they roll over to 2025.
- Aug 12, 2022
- 2,320
- 2,545
IN THIS POST YOU ARE RIGHT!!!
BUT... in your first post you write 0.100 version that is wrong
I already said that i was talking only about this
after 0.99 calling version 0.100 is wrong
I aleady explain that this game version as no three dots
you are posting 1.x.x example
this game uses 0.xx a version numbering with only 1 dit since the start!
I had Mac os 9 (was my first Mac G4)and the latest version was 9.2.3do you really want continue about this useless discussion???
you now are right because you are putiing another dot but ... i started this discussion only because your first post was this
https://f95zone.to/threads/the-office-wife-v0-90-public-j-s-deacon.44541/post-12718641
and 0.100 - 0.101 are wrong numbers...
now you are writiing version with x.x.x .... that is correct
I'm glad I was helpful in correcting the mistake you made in your first post!
I already said that I agree with you. the game can continue continue to be update also after version 1.0
The numbering system in the app is with only one dot...so numerical progression will be 1.01, 1.02 and so on...
this is good to avoid confusion...
the same problem was for another dev that is my friend...
he decided to change the numeration by using EP instead version... but was not so easy for the supporters
He had to write a long post explaining the decision to change number system, and despite the post people kept asking for months if the new episode 16 included the previous versions.
obviously J S Deacon has every right to decide what to do...although I think the story of The Office Wife is nearing its end...or at least it needs a season finale to then open the second season
hope the case is closed
Last edited:
Everybody hopes the fucking case is closed, seriously is there nothing better to talk about here than this worthless bunch of shit.
- Aug 12, 2022
- 2,320
- 2,545
I was quoted that is why i replay again!
my latest post was clear!... but he/she quoted again me!... i was think that the case was already closed.... before getting quoted again
Sorry for bothering you
- Aug 12, 2022
- 2,320
- 2,545
I agree with you!
I expected much earlier that she would be more and more slut instead she keeps destroying poor Simon's ego and when Steve fucks her he seems as reluctant as if it was the first time...
the story with Nate stopped completely and still the strip club in front of the Knocker has no progress
Now she seems to be the wife of her brother and the husband is desappears
and really strange how still Stacy continues to be reluctant despite orders received from Morgan
it would be interesting to know what they are going to give her as her next work outfit...because it seems to me that this is the last one
Maybe the next will be this?
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
I hope she will be more slut with Simon and other coworkers.
The storyline with her brother is played out and boring as shit at this point, would like to see landlord and his friends take another run at stacy.
Dunno, I sort of like the storyline with the brother. The hardcore cucking of the husband where the brother completely replaces him and where Stacy starts to view her brother as her true husband is kind of hot. Then Donnie can share her with his boss and the other goons.
- Nov 21, 2018
- 1,530
- 2,648
While I also like the scenes with Donnie, I don't think that Stacy is beginning to view him as her true husband, or that she is in any way replacing Jason. I honestly don't think that will happen in the game.
I don't care about the landlord's friends, but I very much want the landlord to finally have his way with her, preferably more than once.
"While I also like the scenes with Donnie, I don't think that Stacy is beginning to view him as her true husband, or that she is in any way replacing Jason. I honestly don't think that will happen in the game."
Probably not, but I feel the Donnie thing has just started. There is a lot further they can go with the plot here. It might be a long time before Jason gets a taste again.
Probably not, but I feel the Donnie thing has just started. There is a lot further they can go with the plot here. It might be a long time before Jason gets a taste again.
I am living in the wrong city.I grew up in NYC, trust me this and more can and did happen. You wont see it daily but this is nothing.
"Major Version 0, Minor Version 99" can be written as v.0.99 or v.[0, 99] or v.[[Major, 0], [Minor, 99]] or VersionID "0-99" or Version: 0/99 among others.
"Major Version 0, Minor Version 100" can be written as v.0.100 or v.[0, 100] or v.[[Major, 0], [Minor, 100]] or VersionID "0-100" or Version: 0/100 among others.
"Major Version 0, Minor Version 100" should not be written as [1, 0], or [[Major, 1][Minor, 0]] or Version: 1/0 as that could clearly cause confusion.
Additionally, B versions do not need to be explicit (nor do Minor Versions)
Version: 1, could be followed by Version: 1/1 which could be followed by Version: 1/1/1
Version: 1/9, could be followed by Version: 2, or Version: 1/10, or Version: 1/9/1
v.0.100 could be followed by v.0.100.B (which would mean that "A" was implied originally.)
I used to name my versions using a lead zero, so that versions would start at
Major Version: 0, Minor Version: 01 and go up from there. My files could therefore be named as 0.01, 0.02, 0.03, and so on. The problem is that the files became hard to search for when I managed to reach Version 0.100, so I made one folder for the first 100 minor patches, then another for later ones.
examples:
\Archive\minorversion0-99\[insert name].v0.99
\Archive\minorversion100-999\[insert name].v0.321
If I had reached 1000, I would've just made another folder.
-
You fail to acknowledge that the dot between 0 and 99, is not intended to be used as a radix point.
Would you have the same problem if version: 0,99 was followed by version: 0,100?