It is
both misogynistic
and dated. You stated an absolute that "women love drama," which is so oversimplified it says more about the person saying it than the subject of the conversation. You did not say "some" or "many or "most," you lumped all women - every single one of them - together as if they were not individuals with their own varying tastes.
And your use of the term stay-at-home-mons is less egregious but it is clearly outdated. Since you seem to love stats so much, why don't
you look up the demographics of stay-at-home-moms. You will find that in 2023 there are virtually
no SAHM anymore other than
almost exclusively wealthy, white women because the economics of single-income homes are no longer feasible for the vast majority of working-class families. So your sweeping generalisms make even less sense since in reality they only apply to a small subgrouping of "women" in the first place.
But the lack of logic in your post is made even more glaring when you say something telling like "
every person I know who watches soaps is a woman" as evidence that your generalization must be true. Clearly you do not understand that the entire world is made up many different people most of which
are not exaxtly like the ones you know personally.
These 5 humans that I know like apples ≠ ALL humans like apples.
This is basic elementary school logic. And using
anecdotes as support for statistics shows a fundamental lack of understanding of statistics in the first place.
Or instead of all that I suppose I could just use your rationale and say that I know three women who can't stand soap operas. Therefore, all women hate soap operas. Q.E.D.