- Dec 5, 2017
- 498
- 2,198
- Thread starter novel
- Start date
- Jul 24, 2017
- 406
- 299
- Jun 12, 2017
- 829
- 2,377
imagine all devs being this efficient and we start getting this huge updates in 3 weeks
- Dec 5, 2017
- 498
- 2,198
I don't know. I Check, thanks. I doubt that they have achieved such growth. Who then will buy expensive video cards.
Downloaded, started the render. Well, until I noticed a wild increase in speed.
- Jul 1, 2018
- 402
- 685
I got to thinking the other day, and I realized something. as great as Ann is, life with her would be exhausting to say the least. Fun but exhausting.
- Apr 27, 2017
- 1,925
- 3,879
You only live once.
Ann is still by far the best girl.
- Jul 24, 2017
- 406
- 299
He already have gtx 1080ti sli and i7 something. In his tread the dev wrote that the speed was increased by some new option or something like that.
- Jul 1, 2018
- 402
- 685
In a game replete with hot scenes; that shower scene, might be, the hottest in any game I have played. Second would be the teasing scenes with the oldest daughter in "Where the Heart Is."
- Dec 5, 2017
- 498
- 2,198
Throw off exile, or the text please. There's a noise canceling function. Thanks to her, the noise goes faster, but the picture is much blurred. And I can't use it all the time. It is convenient for dark scenes, which used to be in the Daz was to do long and hard.
- Jul 24, 2017
- 406
- 299
From what I understand he used and I quote ''DAZ 4.11 public beta with the new awesome post denoiser that saves me up to 80% of rendering time for some scenes and animations.'' I don't know much about DAZ so if you want to find out more I can tell you the game and the dev.
- Dec 5, 2017
- 498
- 2,198
Yes, there is such a function. Unfortunately it is heavily soap the picture. But in some situations, Yes, it will help. It is a pity that I often use a different style and there it will not help me.
- Jul 24, 2017
- 406
- 299
Well, let's hope that they will release some new option that will help with your style.
- Dec 5, 2017
- 498
- 2,198
There will be time I will show what this function gives. I will make two renders with an equal number of passes.
- Dec 5, 2017
- 498
- 2,198
Test:
1) Without filter. 40 minutes. Noticeable noise, but the picture is clearer.
2) With the filter. 10 minutes. No noise, but the picture is more blurred.
Conclusion. The function is useful, the work will accelerate, but not everywhere it can be used. Sorry to late found out, most of the update is done.
1) Without filter. 40 minutes. Noticeable noise, but the picture is clearer.
2) With the filter. 10 minutes. No noise, but the picture is more blurred.
Conclusion. The function is useful, the work will accelerate, but not everywhere it can be used. Sorry to late found out, most of the update is done.
- Jul 24, 2017
- 406
- 299
There is definitely a noticeable difference but I would say that the most people won't complain or notice it if they don't specifically look for it. Btw I have an idea. Is it going to be better if you render it in 4k and downsample it to 1920x1080? Maybe that way you can clear some of the pictures.
- Dec 5, 2017
- 498
- 2,198
You kidding me? I even 1920x1080 for a very long time rendered. I was working 1280 by 720.
The surest way to avoid noise is with a good video card. Nothing else will help. Although a filter I will definitely use it. But not in all scenes.
- Jun 5, 2017
- 1,566
- 2,299
I'do go with second one. Difference is almost none (well, at least for me) and not worth half of hour increased time and noise during rendering.
But as said above, ask patreons, because at the end of day, they're those who provide you financial support.
But as said above, ask patreons, because at the end of day, they're those who provide you financial support.