- Nov 18, 2016
- 4,477
- 10,634
Yeah, would 100% reccomend to make it optional... Cause well, to be frank, that ain't harem, so for people that want harem, that stuff is annoying, and a turn-off. (i.e. is basically forcing the les-sharing/polyamory fetish on them, when they just want harem).The only thing I'm comfortable stating are there's currently no planned NTR, MMF, sharing, swinging, etc. content.
As far as the girls having relationships with each other, it's tentatively planned, but to avoid that NTR feel it'll mostly take place with the protagonist as the catalyst. You could probably say they're not really in a relationship with anyone but the MC. More MC-focused MFF like you said.
I can see a few of the girls being DTF each other (with or without the MC involved), and I'd be down to write it, but if that's going to be a sticking point for some it seems best to make it optional if I do end up adding it in.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
The issue isn't just "NTR" feel... it is that sharing isn't Harem basically, so in a harem game, any and all sharing of LIs should be 100% avoidable (this case with other LIs/women), since that isn't harem. (especially any non-MC penetration content, just cause it is a strap-on, doesn't mean anything, it's kinda borderline futa, just the dick is plastic).