Did you read a comment from someone in this thread suggesting that DRG should lay bare his personal dealings? I haven't read any such comment, and if you have, it certainly wasn't from me.
The explanation which he owes to the supporters of the project isn't a list of reasons why he hasn't been posting. It's an explanation of the status of the project, with a simple declaration of whether or not the project will continue being the bare minimum.
And I agree that being a patron (no capital "p") does not entitle anyone to access to the developer's private life. It does, however, entitle you to know when a project has been abandoned (actually abandoned by the developer, I mean, not labeled as such on some forum).
And I believe that he does. As you say, we will continue to disagree.
No, a donation is not just a donation. A pledge to continued support is more than just a donation, and it involves an implied contract (not a legally binding one, but an implied contract, nonetheless). However, I have already spelled out my opinions on this point at length and in detail, earlier in this thread, and I'm not going to reiterate all of those things now. Anyone who wants to know more only has to scan back through a few pages.
And of course a pledge to support does not provide any guarantee that a project will be completed. Once again you are responding to statements which I never made or implied in any way.