- Thread starter 7767
- Start date
I've not played for a few updates so I'm not sure who has joined the roster lately and who hasn't, but I would welcome a nice power battle between Morrigan and the MC, it's about time he took control of things for once, I don't really want to see anyone off Morrigan but I sure would like to see her oppressive control off the MC challenged and maybe even make her more of an equal/sub to the mc, but who knows what will happen. I'd welcome a plot where Morrigan's skill/ability to control everything is dampened by some force that was perhaps dormant inside the MC for ages and cements his position at the top. I actually like Morganna I just hate how she as a 'side' character has more power than the main character at the key points in the game (no idea if this changes in the more recent updates as I haven't had time to play them)
I tried both routes and up until I stopped playing (I think it was 1.4/1.5) and there were no repercussions for killing Ava and that annoyed me, the MC basically acted like he didn't give a damn about her, I know it's probably heavily tied into the story plot and that's fine but I can only hope that it changes and the MC becomes someone we can actually respect eventually.
- Oct 15, 2018
- 454
- 971
- Jan 19, 2020
- 12,382
- 49,125
No patch is required as stated in the mod's OP. The mod already does the heavy lifting.
- Jan 19, 2020
- 12,382
- 49,125
You're confusing the shit out of yourself. First of all, before v1.6.1 (in either version of v1.6.0) the requirement was Morrigan Love(6+) which was clearly a mistake in the code. in v1.6.1 it was changed to Morrigan Lust(6+). Make more sense now?
Nothing is wrong with her Lust system. If you want the scene to trigger then the player simply needs to have made the choices that increased her Lust prior to that. The choices are geared toward a lust mindset where the others are geared toward a loving mindset.
- Dec 24, 2018
- 3,240
- 6,904
Well, I wasn't aware of the requirement change from Love to Lust (hence that explains why it doesn't trigger with 1.6.1), and not like I paid attention to such requirements before till now.
That still doesn't really explain why it has to be one or the other though.
Why not just change it to requirement being either Love Points 6+ or Lust Points 6+ so players who pursue solo Morrigan path (and don't want the bisexual Morrigan path) can enjoy the Morrigan backdoor scene as well?
All this "one or the other" absolute approach would be doing will be forcing players to take bisexual Morrigan approach (that not everyone would be a fan of) unless someone edits the saves like The Witcher did for me in this case.
I mean sure, if Morrigan backdoor scene was another threesome scene with Darya again, then I'd be fine with it (since doing threesome with Darya seems to give 5+ boost to Lust), but since this was a solo scene with Morrigan & MC, those who chose to go solo with Morrigan in the tent (sending Darya away) should be able to view the scene too.
Last edited:
- Jan 19, 2020
- 12,382
- 49,125
Well, you're not forced to take the bisexual approach if you don't want to. If you want her to be a cum dumpster then you have to. Here's my best guess at the answer to that question: The author see's that Morrigan ain't gonna take it up the ass unless she get's some poontang too, maybe that's what her character simply wants. Maybe he also sees it that in a loving, non-lustfull relationship that she may not want entry into her outie. It's his fictional story to tell after all.
- Dec 24, 2018
- 3,240
- 6,904
That's all fine if we assume in the future people who prefer Morrigan Love Points approach (over Lust Points approach) get exclusive sex scenes which Lust Points approach will not be able to access (unless they edit their Morrigan Love points up through edit) like in this case here.
But if that's not the case, all this will be doing is just giving Morrigan Love Points preference people (like myself) less content which I'd assume not many will be pleased with (with balance of content being favored one-way towards Lust approach).
- Jan 19, 2020
- 12,382
- 49,125
Imho think of it as a mini-route split. It happens in all VN's that aren't kinetic. Morrigan PathA & Morrigan PathB, etc. Almost every VN you've ever played does these mini-splits... otherwise why put any choices in the VN at all (therefore it'd be kinetic)? It just seems you may be overthinking it a bit... but that's only my opinion. It'll all be ok bud.
Hey there,
With Morrigan, the love points will be a bit different to get. I mean, there are some layers that we should peel off before getting there. If we look back, their relationship basically started as a game between them and continued based on lust. The love that mc has to build with Morrigan, shouldn't be confused with the same type of love they had before. One other thing that I wanted to reflect, on is that she is the type of character that won't let anyone, even MC, in so easily. In contrast with the sexual part.
- Dec 24, 2018
- 3,240
- 6,904
Okay, but what does it mean for people who prefer stacking Love Points over Lust Points?
As I've said before in my previous post to you, players who focus on Love Points over Lust Points (I had Morrigan at Love = 7 and Lust = 2) are pretty much locked out of that Morrigan backdoor scene because we don't meet the requirements (Lust 6+) compared to v1.6. (Love 6+).
Is it mini-route split like Sancho mentioned above (Love Points route players getting their own exclusive scenes, and Lust Points route players getting their own exclusive scenes)?
If that's the case, then I have no real issue, but if not I'm puzzled as to why the Love Points focus players would be locked out of that scene (unable to see it unless save is edited to manually increase Lust Points).
Last edited:
Yes, those are splitting routes. It depends on how you want to build your relationship. In each of the routes, you will have a different type of relationship with her.
- Jan 3, 2021
- 298
- 262
Glad to hear that.NOPE I don't thinkc so Liliana and Morrigan fit this path. Both are precious treasures for players and Mad king. That would be total war xD Mom? In 1.5v the player decides whether to forgive her or not and here is a potential NTR path. On the other hand, the player can forgive her and develop a normal love relationship, which will be great. Like with the rest of the family. So maybe but if you dont like it then completley no NTR with them. Btw nice MILF in your avatar
At least his mom and sis not ntred, but i dunno what happen on next version.
Its milf from Forest Rhapsody.
Yo dev just wanted to say that your game's a fucking masterpiece bro. I'm one of those guys that value storyline more than just sex and yours is just awesome. The models (especially Morrigan) and other elements are also perfect. Thanks for giving us such good content and Good luck for the future. We support you!
About the next update, Vis 2.0.
Hi mates,
Well, you've read it well. The next update will be version 2.0 and it is going to be an essential leap for the project.
What is to be expected from the next update?!
A standalone build:
First of all, it will be a standalone build that will use the savegame/s from the previous game, Vis 1.6.1. This means that players that have played Vis 1.6.1 will have the option to import the savegame in Vis 2.0 and continue the story. This will be used for persistence purposes so the players can import into the game, the paths, points, and stats that they have. This will be a one-time action. On the other hand, new players to Vis will have to first play Vis 1.6.1 up until the end of the update and then import their save game into 2.0.
Why have I decided to go with a standalone build for 2.0?!
First of all, it's due to the size of the game. Vis 1.6.1 includes material from the beginning of the project and animations that were not optimized and took a lot of space. In the beginning, the animations took around 50 MB per animation, and now, since they have been optimized, they take around 5MB per animation. Going back and optimizing all the animations and renders, would take a huge effort from the development perspective. Not to mention that I would have to redesign the scenes as the quality was different back then.
This will get me to point 2.
The quality of the renders has changed since my first ones. I think (maybe I am too confident) that there is a visible quality difference between the first renders in the game and the ones from 1.6.1. Once again, redesigning the old scenes would take too much, having the current resources. That doesn't mean that sometimes in the future, I won't do that.
The game will have a new UI. I will invest resources in improving the user interface of the game and redesigning certain areas.
Gallery mode will be back. Each update will generate unique pictures for the gallery.
Before ending the news I have, I want to thank you all for staying with me on this journey. I am fully committed to improving the game and without your support and feedback, this wouldn't have been possible.
Thank you!
MK
Hi mates,
Well, you've read it well. The next update will be version 2.0 and it is going to be an essential leap for the project.
What is to be expected from the next update?!
A standalone build:
First of all, it will be a standalone build that will use the savegame/s from the previous game, Vis 1.6.1. This means that players that have played Vis 1.6.1 will have the option to import the savegame in Vis 2.0 and continue the story. This will be used for persistence purposes so the players can import into the game, the paths, points, and stats that they have. This will be a one-time action. On the other hand, new players to Vis will have to first play Vis 1.6.1 up until the end of the update and then import their save game into 2.0.
Why have I decided to go with a standalone build for 2.0?!
First of all, it's due to the size of the game. Vis 1.6.1 includes material from the beginning of the project and animations that were not optimized and took a lot of space. In the beginning, the animations took around 50 MB per animation, and now, since they have been optimized, they take around 5MB per animation. Going back and optimizing all the animations and renders, would take a huge effort from the development perspective. Not to mention that I would have to redesign the scenes as the quality was different back then.
This will get me to point 2.
The quality of the renders has changed since my first ones. I think (maybe I am too confident) that there is a visible quality difference between the first renders in the game and the ones from 1.6.1. Once again, redesigning the old scenes would take too much, having the current resources. That doesn't mean that sometimes in the future, I won't do that.
The game will have a new UI. I will invest resources in improving the user interface of the game and redesigning certain areas.
Gallery mode will be back. Each update will generate unique pictures for the gallery.
Before ending the news I have, I want to thank you all for staying with me on this journey. I am fully committed to improving the game and without your support and feedback, this wouldn't have been possible.
Thank you!
MK
You must be registered to see the links