4.20 star(s) 198 Votes

Qwert99

Member
Mar 2, 2018
462
1,335
Ok let's back up people.. we have some "understanding issue"

You posted a comment whose point I failed to see. I think. So I posted a reply to you, asking what was the message you were trying to make. You asked me what was my point to which I answered you back: the point of my post, which included a question, was to ask what was your point.

I seriously think it is not hard to understand. But I am going to ask you again, what is the idea you are trying to convey? it is simply what was written? or something else?

Pure curiosity at hand.
What is the point of you asking what my point was? Before you reply you were just curious, what is the point of you being curious? In the end, what is the point of life, or anything for that matter?

Your question is as pointless as my original comment was. Not everything needs to be a logical argument or an academic paper for it to be expressed.
 

HornyyPussy

Board Buff
Apr 26, 2020
16,164
37,854
What is the point of you asking what my point was? Before you reply you were just curious, what is the point of you being curious? In the end, what is the point of life, or anything for that matter?

Your question is as pointless as my original comment was. Not everything needs to be a logical argument or an academic paper for it to be expressed.
You do get the idea of a "discussion forum", don't you? You make a post, other people comment on it?
 

Qwert99

Member
Mar 2, 2018
462
1,335
You personally saying something is correct and objectively true, unfortunately doesn't make it so.
WIAB 0.1 was released in the Fall of 2018, i.e. he worked on it beforehand --> almost 3 years in and we're still at 0.6 and it's being reworked. So, that's objectively correct.

Summer's Gone 0.1 was released in the Spring of 2019 --> almost 2 years in and it's at Chapter 3. So, that was correct too..

So yeah. You saying something isn't correct doesn't make it incorrect.
 

Ayhsel

Chocolate Vampire
Donor
May 9, 2019
4,933
16,539
What is the point of you asking what my point was? Before you reply you were just curious, what is the point of you being curious? In the end, what is the point of life, or anything for that matter?

Your question is as pointless as my original comment was. Not everything needs to be a logical argument or an academic paper for it to be expressed.
My question was not pointless. It has as objective making you answer what was the underlying idea of your message. And you have just answered: it has no point.

So these interchange of communication proves my message was not pointless and even served the purpose, figuring out your idea, which for there was, according to you, none.

Pity you failed to see the argument in that..
 
  • Like
Reactions: magnolieh

HornyyPussy

Board Buff
Apr 26, 2020
16,164
37,854
WIAB 0.1 was released in the Fall of 2018, i.e. he worked on it beforehand --> almost 3 years in and we're still at 0.6 and it's being reworked. So, that's objectively correct.

Summer's Gone 0.1 was released in the Spring of 2019 --> almost 2 years in and it's at Chapter 3. So, that was correct too..

So yeah. You saying something isn't correct doesn't make it incorrect.
And the fact that has been discussed a couple of pages ago? That he has updated his rendering rigs so he can update faster, you just glossed over that by convinience?
 

Qwert99

Member
Mar 2, 2018
462
1,335
And the fact that has been discussed a couple of pages ago? That he has updated his rendering rigs so he can update faster, you just glossed over that by convinience?
I dunno, you just glossed over the fact that he intends to make five games and that him speeding up his 1 chapter/8 months routine isn't gonna make 30 chapters a game go terribly quickly either. Guess we're both prone to leaving out details. Except I was just making a joke originally.
 

HornyyPussy

Board Buff
Apr 26, 2020
16,164
37,854
I dunno, you just glossed over the fact that he intends to make five games and that him speeding up his 1 chapter/8 months routine isn't gonna make 30 chapters a game go terribly quickly either. Guess we're both prone to leaving out details. Except I was just making a joke originally.
Yeah, that joke fell flat. I'm not ignoring anything since I don't have a problem with their release speed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: johndoe19

Qwert99

Member
Mar 2, 2018
462
1,335
My question was not pointless. It has as objective making you answer what was the underlying idea of your message. And you have just answered: it has no point.

So these interchange of communication proves my message was not pointless and even served the purpose, figuring out your idea, which for there was, according to you, none.

Pity you failed to see the argument in that..
Guess I was too bogged down in the actual academic definitions of things such as "argument" "point" and "reasoning" instead of just using them randomly in whatever way I so desire to understand what you were getting at.

To answer your plea for help disguised as a clever retort: no, in the end your inquiry was completely pointless. As is me replying to you, but I'm bored and have nothing else to do.
 

Ayhsel

Chocolate Vampire
Donor
May 9, 2019
4,933
16,539
Guess I was too bogged down in the actual academic definitions of things such as "argument" "point" and "reasoning" instead of just using them randomly in whatever way I so desire to understand what you were getting at.

To answer your plea for help disguised as a clever retort: no, in the end your inquiry was completely pointless. As is me replying to you, but I'm bored and have nothing else to do.
It wasn't. But it is ok. You don't need to understand it.

Thanks for answering to my question.
 

johndoe19

Member
May 31, 2019
241
488
WIAB 0.1 was released in the Fall of 2018, i.e. he worked on it beforehand --> almost 3 years in and we're still at 0.6 and it's being reworked. So, that's objectively correct.

Summer's Gone 0.1 was released in the Spring of 2019 --> almost 2 years in and it's at Chapter 3. So, that was correct too..

So yeah. You saying something isn't correct doesn't make it incorrect.
Yes however the interpretation you are making with that information is incorrect or at the very least still a variable that remains to be determined. For reasons that I won't repeat, for everybody has already said them multiple times, that lengthy time between updates should not be an issue moving forward. That has even been said by the developer oceanlab himself. Which then should be taken as the case unless proved otherwise.
 

whichone

Forum Fanatic
Jan 3, 2018
4,915
10,326
WIAB 0.1 was released in the Fall of 2018, i.e. he worked on it beforehand --> almost 3 years in and we're still at 0.6 and it's being reworked. So, that's objectively correct.
No it's not.
It's objectively incorrect.
As we're only in February, 2 months into the year, it's beyond a stretch to call it "almost 3 years".
Autumn/Fall begins roughly Sept/Oct. 2 yrs 5 months is "almost" 2.5 years. Not "almost 3".
Something 7 months away is not "almost here".
I guess you were too bogged down in "academic definitions" to miss that particular definition?
 

slightchance

Active Member
Mar 25, 2018
975
1,881
Some people are ambitious like that. Reminds me of Jim Butcher, who started his writing career with a project that would take 24 years minimum to complete.
Different medium. You can still enjoy the poems of Homer almost 3000 years later. Even if you only read a translation, it's a timeless experience.
I don't believe games with that kind of art style will be relevant for long, not if they have the goal to mimic life as close as possible. In 24 years, a PC might need half a second to produce a render from different angles simultaneously for VR ready portfolios.

More abstract art like manga and toons will probably endure though.
 

Qwert99

Member
Mar 2, 2018
462
1,335
No it's not.
It's objectively incorrect.
As we're only in February, 2 months into the year, it's beyond a stretch to call it "almost 3 years".
Autumn/Fall begins roughly Sept/Oct. 2 yrs 5 months is "almost" 2.5 years. Not "almost 3".
Something 7 months away is not "almost here".
I guess you were too bogged down in "academic definitions" to miss that particular definition?
Do you really think he started working on the game he released in the Fall when he took more than half a year per update in that period? No, he likely started somewhere around the end of Winter. So yes, it's almost 3 years, factually correct.

"As we're only in February,"

It's February the 28th. Literally hours away from March. Trying to counter my perfectly logical assumption then starting with bad faith arguments is utter cringe.
 

whichone

Forum Fanatic
Jan 3, 2018
4,915
10,326
Do you really think he started working on the game he released in the Fall when he took more than half a year per update in that period? No, he likely started somewhere around the end of Winter. So yes, it's almost 3 years, factually correct.

"As we're only in February,"

It's February the 28th. Literally hours away from March. Trying to counter my perfectly logical assumption then starting with bad faith arguments is utter cringe.
Yes, I counted February as one of the months. I see you really do struggle with mathematics.
October is the 10th month. February is the 2nd.
10 - 12 is 3. 1 -2 is 2.
Precisely what I said: "2 yrs 5 months".
I suggest you direct your cringe inwards, where it is justifiable.
 

Qwert99

Member
Mar 2, 2018
462
1,335
Yes, I counted February as one of the months. I see you really do struggle with mathematics.
October is the 10th month. February is the 2nd.
10 - 12 is 3. 1 -2 is 2.
Precisely what I said: "2 yrs 5 months".
I suggest you direct your cringe inwards, where it is justifiable.
Read my lips: h e h a d t o s t a r t w o r k i n g w a y b e f o r e f i r s t r e l e a s e

But nice job completely ignoring the actually important bit of my reply.
 

whichone

Forum Fanatic
Jan 3, 2018
4,915
10,326
Read my lips: h e h a d t o s t a r t w o r k i n g w a y b e f o r e f i r s t r e l e a s e

But nice job completely ignoring the actual important bit of my reply.
Of course I ignore the unquantifiable part, it's worthless of consideration.
It has zero relevance to the part of your post which I dispute.

2 years and 5 months is, quite factually, not "almost 3 years".
It is, factually, objectively, "almost" (by academic definition) 2.5 years.

Ergo your post was, objectively, incorrect.
 
4.20 star(s) 198 Votes