Jolina is one of the few I don't suspect.
we need more zarah
These conversations in this game killing me man. Esspecially Katie. Girls are so unique. I am not a harem guy. I don't like to have all girls possible. I am more like have one girl to adore. But in this game i want all of them. Besides matures. Katie, Debbie, Lily, Jenna, Jo, Bella. Everyone has different taste. You have done well mate. This game is rally terrific. I tried to explain how i like this game, i could say much more but English is not my main language. I'm still learning. Will be waiting for updates.
Then you are in luck sweetness, there is no harem here.
you'll be surprised when Cheeky flips everyone the bird and a harem edning will be the canon ending
Still being the worst in design damn.. poor Zarah
why the worst?
If you’re outside USA then fair enough, things may be different in different countries, otherwise you’re talking utter nonsense. Contracts between private parties fall under civil law jurisdiction, not criminal jurisdiction. Under no situation would breach of contract between individual parties be subject to criminal prosecution.
you can’t have a clause that requires the return of property once the transfer of property has been made. Completely unenforceable. There can be conditions, contractual obligations as part of the initial transfer, regarding the “sell-on” of real estate or material property, including a claim to the proceeds of any future transfer of the asset. that is totally different from a transfer of cash or other forms of liquidity. You couldn’t enforce a clause that says something like “you met my terms, you get the million dollars, but if you visit my friend you have to give it back.” No way.
Why would I be wrong, I only repeated what Ace said and he works on the game.
I don’t contest they are legally binding, of course they are. Subject to criminal prosecution (possible jail time was mentioned), no chance. That was my point.
About the money i think the lawyer explained that the maximum possible period by law was 10 years. So basically there will be monthly or yearly payments for 10 years. And i guess if let's say on year 3 they catch you breaching your clause, you lose the rest of the money. There however can be payment plan where you receive 1% the first year, 2% the second, 4% the 3rd and so on. So basically the biggest amount of money is left for the last payment.
Maybe I've been caught doing a bit too much skipping text, hehe. Even if the money is time-release then what I said stands, they can cut off future disbursements but there's no way to reclaim past transfers.
