If you use the "possess" option you can play as any other character. In the changelog you will find a google sheet with all the sex animations/combinations that are in the game and in there you can scroll to the right and also see, which characters share the same animation. So for example if it says Maya_Bol, you can exchange Maya for most other female models which do not share a body with Shey.
Unreal Engine Wild Life [Patreon Build 2024.06.14] [Adeptus Steve]
- Aug 4, 2020
- 2,395
- 3,073
Hey 
Sorry, but I need to ask... If I place downloaded maps into sandbox folder, and open them from the sandbox menu, everything is incativ in that map... that is normal, or I missed something ?
And at he characters there are some cameras...
Thanks
Sorry, but I need to ask... If I place downloaded maps into sandbox folder, and open them from the sandbox menu, everything is incativ in that map... that is normal, or I missed something ?And at he characters there are some cameras...
Thanks
Where does this go ? In collections ?
Also mods can we get a seperate thread for chars and stuff instead of having a flood of everything in one thread..
- May 8, 2017
- 765
- 2,305
AdeptusSteve Could you please do a "skin" on the futa dick to look as a strap on? It would be nice on people (like me) who skip futa content.
Thanks for reading this.
Thanks for reading this.
Last edited:
FeltTheNeed Brother can you fix the download links in your rentry props list for the recent files made by Kenevra? Some of the links are incorrect. Thank you
- Nov 22, 2021
- 84
- 474
- Aug 4, 2020
- 2,395
- 3,073
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
- Dec 19, 2019
- 348
- 543
Yeah should be the one on main page (page 1), scroll to the top.
I personally use Go-File, the speed is fast like mega, but it doesn't have the download limit of 5gb a day like Mega does.
Edit: sometimes with go file, you gotta close it and click the link again to get the file to show up.
- Jul 30, 2017
- 2,093
- 3,270
All this Architectural design, but no porn content. You guys are having more fun building a house, instead of making erotic scenarios that could result in a stimulating mind fuck that produces powerful lust-filled emotions.
We won't be able to make true erotic scenarios for at least 3-4 years. So think on that before you waste all your time building a huge ass building, lol.
The devs don't really know what the long term gameplan for the sandbox is, so beware. Think I'm wrong? Okay, link me to some kind of document that outlines precisely what Sandbox will be three years from now? Go on, I'm waiting. Can't find it? Yup, that's right. They have no long term game plan for sandbox, they're kind of just winging it, thinking purely on the short term, with most of their emphasis on single player (which is fine, since single player will probably be an amazing experience).
Sandbox is a prototype experiment, nothing more. It's YEARS from being a final product. Can it truly be a great thing? YES, but not for at least 3-4 years. However, if they do keep at it, I truly believe it could be an amazing product after 3-4 years, so it's worth looking into WAY later.
This is supposed to be a porn product, yet you guys keep showcasing a house, building, island, WHERE's THE PORN CONTENT? Not just a sex scene viewer either, I'm talking about actually making a simple story, dialogue with a sexual plot twist that results in a powerful erotic feeling. Like creating a scenario where you steal someone elses girlfriend away and fuck her, something simple like that, involving a bit of dialogue, some choices, and a climax.
We won't be able to make true erotic scenarios for at least 3-4 years. So think on that before you waste all your time building a huge ass building, lol.
The devs don't really know what the long term gameplan for the sandbox is, so beware. Think I'm wrong? Okay, link me to some kind of document that outlines precisely what Sandbox will be three years from now? Go on, I'm waiting. Can't find it? Yup, that's right. They have no long term game plan for sandbox, they're kind of just winging it, thinking purely on the short term, with most of their emphasis on single player (which is fine, since single player will probably be an amazing experience).
Sandbox is a prototype experiment, nothing more. It's YEARS from being a final product. Can it truly be a great thing? YES, but not for at least 3-4 years. However, if they do keep at it, I truly believe it could be an amazing product after 3-4 years, so it's worth looking into WAY later.
This is supposed to be a porn product, yet you guys keep showcasing a house, building, island, WHERE's THE PORN CONTENT? Not just a sex scene viewer either, I'm talking about actually making a simple story, dialogue with a sexual plot twist that results in a powerful erotic feeling. Like creating a scenario where you steal someone elses girlfriend away and fuck her, something simple like that, involving a bit of dialogue, some choices, and a climax.
- Apr 16, 2020
- 73
- 122
Dude, what's the right way to play Minecraft? Go ahead, I'm waiting...
Bully for you, not understanding that people enjoy something you don't. I don't think a single person here cares about a roadmap, because it's not at that point yet. As you said, the sandbox is an experiment. I'd just wait and be surprised...
Last edited:
- Nov 22, 2021
- 84
- 474
Be the change you wish to see in the world, go forth - make and release those erotic porn scenario contents as you described.
Would seem selfish to expect others to halt what they find enjoyable to do in the sandbox to try make content that suits you.
Instead of being a beacon of light or a great example you instead choose to be condescending of others for what they decide to do with their free time. Regardless of it being an adult game there is no Wild Life Sandbox EULA or DocuSign contract stating we can only make porn content besides all those user maps, houses, buildings, ships etc can be used as foundations for future porn scenarios for those willing to make them with the tools provided and continuous improvements being made to sandbox.
Last edited:
- Jul 18, 2020
- 186
- 583
hakarlman has a point, in a different way.
So far, when it comes to sandbox user creations the ratio between created maps/props and playable scenarios is what? 90% to 10% maybe? I find it hard to believe that everyone just wants to create maps/props and not scenarios. I think it's quite likely that the reason for this is the level of editor programming know-how needed to pull off a good playable scenario is higher then people are comfortable with. So could be that people just focus mostly on building stuff ala minecraft bcs it is much easier to do. I tried myself to make some scenarios but gave up when I got lost in all the editor programming tools.
So far, when it comes to sandbox user creations the ratio between created maps/props and playable scenarios is what? 90% to 10% maybe? I find it hard to believe that everyone just wants to create maps/props and not scenarios. I think it's quite likely that the reason for this is the level of editor programming know-how needed to pull off a good playable scenario is higher then people are comfortable with. So could be that people just focus mostly on building stuff ala minecraft bcs it is much easier to do. I tried myself to make some scenarios but gave up when I got lost in all the editor programming tools.
- Jul 30, 2017
- 2,093
- 3,270
I predict 3-4 years ( I don't mind waiting to be honest heheh ). What's your prediction; When we can finally make those porn scenarios?
Tools provided are non-existent. No one wants to code it. Having to code it is overkill. The developer of the sandbox doesn't actually use sandbox to make porn himself, so he has no idea what the end user actually wants, because he never actually talks to them for more than 10 seconds, lol. He's a damn good coder who doesn't use the product for himself, and if no one gives him a long term gameplan, he's just gonna keep winging it, and we'll end up with PONG FFS, hahahah.
You can make porn scenarios right now, the only thing that bothered me, and the reason i stopped building for now, is that you can't create scenes where you can go back and fort in the way that the developers make them. It would be possible with the prop that came out that allows you to bind different keys for an action (r,f,t,g,h etc.) but once you bind a key to a specific camera you cant disable it. So i can't reuse lets say letter "y" to go back to previous scene and "u" to go forward on multiple cameras. Everything else can kinda be done.
- Aug 4, 2020
- 2,395
- 3,073
Sir, this is a Wendy's
Having a couple of events and logic gates != coding.
- Apr 16, 2020
- 73
- 122