I'm also stuck on this part, but it doesn't seem to be answered since the only topic anyone seems to talk about on here is NTR.
You can buy it on the merchant. It's a gift for the husband. It's in town. But you need to buy all the previous gift for the husband first. Since each item is unlock after the previouswas buy and given to the husband. (need to buy the first to unlock the second and need to buy the second to unlock the third, need to buy the third to unlock the fourth, etc.)
so NEVER ask again? that's just silly
if you say "ask later" then WHEN "later" and WHY exactly THAT later?
also she was free to repeat her noes or stop answering (or is talking to silent person a rape too?)
I have not much time to spare to someone having
spoiled child mentality... You know exactly what I mean. "Later" mean "when the TWO of them are in the mood". Not only one... And yes, she can repeat herself... But... your method is only forcing yourself on her to make her say "yes"... It's not a real "yes" its only to have peace quickly and not having to deal anymore with a spoiled child keeping his complaint... (I sincerely pity you if you're
really so much a slave to your own lust... [so, if you're not a troll] .. not worth than a vulgar animal from my point of view if it's really the method you use...)
Anything that removes ones free will (both physically and mentally).
However i do not believe blackmail to be rape that is because one still has a choice there (and one had to do something bad to begin with).
Without doubt sexual coercion is crime but i do no not think its judged as rape.
Or rather every rape is sexual coercion but not every sexual coercion is rape , if that makes sense.
So as example when sexual coercion is done through physical force, immediate threat or drugs it would be rape as opposed to employee having sex with boss to keep the job. In the latter there is still a choice and in rape victim has no choice whatsoever.
There is no choice... When there is a loss for saying "no"... it's not a choice anymore...
When there is a "sanction/punishment"(being fired-up for example) for saying "NO", there is no choice left...
It's a mental removal of free will... Therefore, It is a rape case.
And no... One not had to do something bad to begin with... Blackmail and coercion can be a boss forcing an employed to have sex... and be fired up if the employed dare say "no"... The employed / someone not need to have done something bad to begin with... And even if it was the case that "the one" do something bad to begin with... it give no right to anyone to use blackmail on him/her... It's irrelevant! It only sugar-coat the thing to legitimate rape... it's like a child complaining that one "do a thing" and use it as a legitimation to do the same thing or to do worst... It's only child mentality... (that one do a bad thing don't give the right to do the same or worst...)
But... There is one similar case I'll not count it as blackmail/coercion and therefore not count as rape... With the same logic as your example: A boss proposing a quick promotion under the condition of having sex with him/her. In this case, it's really up to the employed. Take much attention to the red quote.
It implies that even if you don't have sex with him/her it won't close the door and possibilities of being promoted. (and you won't get fired up)
It implies that it's the quick way to be promoted but not the only way. In this case, the employed can refuse and work normally, get promoted normally. etc. etc.
In this case, it's not blackmail nor real coercion. More a condition of an agreement for "mutual benefit". If the employed refuse, he/she lose nothing and the boss lose nothing either. If the employed accept, she/he gain something and the boss gain also something.
In coercion and blackmail... The coerced/blackmailed gain nothing. She/he only keep what she/he already have... It's not a mutual benefit... Adding condition to maintain something she/he already own, it's already a loss...
To take an example with this game, to keep on trail with it: The rich merchant (Robson) didn't blackmailed Zefira... He proposed to help his husband under the condition she work for him as a pleasure maid. But he didn't menace her to detroy his husband work if she refuse. There is mutual benefit without mutal loss and it's up to her to really willingly accept or refuse. It's not a rape. (well, at the start anyway ==> I didn't play yet the cuckhold route, so I don't know if he will use their first time together to blackmail her for more... )
And pretty sure law judges those differently just like vandalism and theft are different crimes even when in both victim loses something.
Furthermore i do not believe blackmail to be blackmail when the reason is nonsensical (same goes for coercion). And i think law has problem with that as well. Like imagine you convince a girl that your sperm has healing capabilities if she gets "injected" (lol) and then she goes and sues you for tricking her because she didn't get healed. That is a really high chance of case dismissed and judge facepalming all the time.
For me, vandalism and theft are the same thing... The victim suffer the same loss... So it's only logical that the perpetrator suffer the same judgement... it's nonsensical to give an other judgement depending of theft or vandalism... (to take your example)
Well, for the example of "curative sperm", it's not blackmail... It's more like "false advertising".
It's the same as the example earlier, the husband promising his wife a cruise if she said yes... And not keeping his promise... I said it was not a rape. But there is deception nonetheless. But in your example, we can argue about the mentality state of the woman. If she was in a state to give her consenting or not. (if she was mentally retarded, it can be see as a rape... if she was just dumb... it's another story...)
