3.90 star(s) 31 Votes

Karmadive

Member
Mar 12, 2020
144
320
I believe they said news about update early Dec.. the 2nd or something. Not the update but the next communication. and probably dates for the update release.
 

Joshy92

Devoted Member
Mar 25, 2021
9,203
19,857
I'm really looking forward to this next update
I can't wait to hear Stephs big secret
I think it's going to be the most important reveal in the game
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grumpy Old Aussie

Grumpy Old Aussie

Engaged Member
May 6, 2023
2,044
4,153
The only award I would give is to Steph, but she can share it with Tori and take turns shoving it up their assholes :ROFLMAO:
View attachment 3127949
I don't understand why you would create a game of characters you don't want people to like, and centre it on a character deliberately designed to drive you crazy to the verge of driving you away. Its a mystery to me. Then again, we are all still here so maybe its reverse psychology or something :ROFLMAO:
 

Nafig

Member
Oct 14, 2020
131
323
I don't understand why you would create a game of characters you don't want people to like, and centre it on a character deliberately designed to drive you crazy to the verge of driving you away. Its a mystery to me. Then again, we are all still here so maybe its reverse psychology or something :ROFLMAO:
This is not reverse psychology. The main condition is: “players should not want to drive away Steph”, but this is not the case, there is: “players cannot drive away Steph”. In this context, the author's condition does not work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grumpy Old Aussie

Pr0GamerJohnny

Forum Fanatic
Sep 7, 2022
5,414
7,771
This is not reverse psychology. The main condition is: “players should not want to drive away Steph”, but this is not the case, there is: “players cannot drive away Steph”. In this context, the author's condition does not work.
Sounds working to me! It's like if you ask a Russian person on camera if their government is great, 100% will agree it's super great!


Yes, this is the level of scorn I have for dev.
 

Grumpy Old Aussie

Engaged Member
May 6, 2023
2,044
4,153
This is not reverse psychology. The main condition is: “players should not want to drive away Steph”, but this is not the case, there is: “players cannot drive away Steph”. In this context, the author's condition does not work.
I was paraphrasing a dev quote. the dev said "Steph is designed to drive you crazy but not drive you away." You're right though, you can't drive her away unless you play Asahibito's mod.
 

Joshy92

Devoted Member
Mar 25, 2021
9,203
19,857
The only award I would give is to Steph, but she can share it with Tori and take turns shoving it up their assholes :ROFLMAO:
View attachment 3127949
Bro that is not going up my beautiful angels arse
My tongue is though
I want to give her the best rimjob I possibly can

I love Steph
Although I will admit sometimes she does make me want to pull my hair out
 

Nafig

Member
Oct 14, 2020
131
323
I was paraphrasing a dev quote. the dev said "Steph is designed to drive you crazy but not drive you away." You're right though, you can't drive her away unless you play Asahibito's mod.
This option doesn't work either. Steph should drive you crazy, but at the same time the player will want to fuck her, that's what it sounds like. This is not the case, Steph/Tori do not evoke such feelings. Players see Steph differently than the author, which is absolutely correct. Players evaluate events differently than the author. I don't see anything sexy about Steph's "exploits". Steph's actions do not excite, they cause contempt, and this is a completely different story.
 

Karmadive

Member
Mar 12, 2020
144
320
It always came off as a weird decision to have a Sharing game were the author wants you to feel distrust right away... which in any sharing situation to be healthy you need full trust in your partner. So right off the bat the Dev wants a game about an unhealthy relationship that is already predisposed to end badly.
 

Nurikabe

Well-Known Member
Feb 10, 2021
1,328
2,868
It always came off as a weird decision to have a Sharing game were the author wants you to feel distrust right away... which in any sharing situation to be healthy you need full trust in your partner. So right off the bat the Dev wants a game about an unhealthy relationship that is already predisposed to end badly.
When talking about the original release, you are 100% correct. The devs want the player to feel distrust when in reality, the couple trusts each other entirely. Many people have complained that the MC will not fight back against Steph being bitchy or assert himself, especially when on the low-confidence path. The current release has removed most of the information that made the player distrust Steph. The devs have even made Steph more loveable and Gina less likable for the purposes of taking the argument away from the people complaining about Steph and choosing Gina. The latest version has been written to ensure that the player understands that they are working together, they are in love, and will not leave each other no matter what sexual choices the player makes, high- or low-confidence.

The dev is not aiming for a game where the couple has an unhealthy relationship. The original idea was to make the player think there was an unhealthy relationship. Due to players' complaints, most of the "clues" that led the players to believe there was an unhealthy relationship have been removed. Now, we could argue that the couple is not in the right headspace to enter into an open relationship or any aspect of the swinging lifestyle. I would argue that most people are not prepared to do so. More importantly, trying to apply real world, common sense, and hard lessons learned to a simple game where the point is to get a couple into a simple, open relationship, porn scenario will drive you insane. I think we all hoped that this game would be a much more realistic and sensible story about a mature couple entering the lifestyle. This is not that game.
 

Nurikabe

Well-Known Member
Feb 10, 2021
1,328
2,868
We have certainly postulated some hilarious theories and have apparently been wrong about all of them. I laugh the most when someone gets upset because they believe "Another Man's Wife" refers to a specific person (like Tori) versus the general idea that swinging involves another man's wife.

I am looking forward to hearing the secret, regardless of what it is. Mostly because I want to see the rest of the story. It would be nice to see where this is all going!
 
3.90 star(s) 31 Votes