Yes I think I did, the BeingADIK.app was 12GB before and now it's only 4GB so I think I replaced the original app for the patch only -.-'
I guess I'll have to install the new version and start again... Thank you anyway for your answers!
- Thread starter N7
- Start date
-
- Tags
- 3dcg anal sex animated big ass big tits cheating combat creampie dating sim exhibitionism female domination female protagonist footjob graphic violence groping group sex handjob humiliation humor interracial lesbian male protagonist management masturbation milf multiple protagonist oral sex point & click prostitution puzzle romance sandbox sex toys spanking strategy stripping teasing titfuck turn based combat vaginal sex virgin voyeurism
I guess I'll have to install the new version and start again... Thank you anyway for your answers!
- Jul 9, 2017
- 418
- 1,668
Have you actually ever read the 1st Amendment? You should know that the protection is for people against the federal government. That's it. B&R is not a federal institution, it's a private school or perhaps a state school (I doubt state). They have their own codes of conduct and can fire or punish people for violating them.
Do you seriously think I can walk up to my boss and call her an "obtuse cunt" and then expect protection from the 1st Amendment? I can be fired on the spot. The 1st Amendment doesn't apply to private platforms.
I think you need to stop throwing stones, as you live in a glass house.
- Sep 27, 2020
- 1,838
- 5,542
Nice shot.apparently this is a missing scene, some error or something. This would happen if we have Chick Status, but our status only reset in the first free roaming event.if I understand it right. so it's never happens
Wow Surprises everywhere
- Sep 3, 2017
- 228
- 438
I'm new to this thread and didn't catch it when it was first debated, the thread being 7k pages long.
Would you mind explaning your theory about Lynette being alive?
- Jan 19, 2021
- 160
- 369
Very late to the party here, but I finally got around to playing 0.72 and it was everything I'd hoped for. Dr Pinkcake has hit the ball out of the park again and it was worth every second of the wait. The choices between the girls aren't getting any easier and the plot keeps getting murkier, so I have no idea how all this is going to end. Talk about a rollercoaster of a game!
Ya I'm curious to see what happens with Lily - certainly an intriguing conversation MC has with her if you get her scene at the HOTs party.
- May 24, 2018
- 1,157
- 600
- May 24, 2018
- 1,157
- 600
- Sep 27, 2020
- 1,838
- 5,542
- Apr 14, 2021
- 1,107
- 3,236
Bullshit, you can see Bella jealous when you talk to Cathy. Its need to be blind to not see it. When I've played 1st time blind with no help I've noticed that for sure and rejected Cathy with no second thought - I was sure that its gonna be a problem with Bella.
- Sep 3, 2017
- 228
- 438
Evidently, but I mean, sometimes during my play through, specially when the MC is reading his mother's diary, the thought of his mom being alive cropped up in my head.
Like she was VERY young when she ran away to his father, what if poverty changed her views, but she was already pregnant. So she decided to have the child, leave the child with the father and just peace out. The father never had the guts to confess to the child that his mother abandoned him and just invented the story of her death, so the boy wouldn't feel betrayed by his own mother.
I feel like at the end of the diary we are going to get some pretty major reveal and Lynette being alive would be a massive gut punch. She prefered wealth over her own child.
My game is fucked. I'm stuck on the tutorial for rebuilding the house. Adding john boy and nick gives me a soft lock, can't do anything.
- Apr 14, 2021
- 1,107
- 3,236
The problem in that scene is someone sleeping in Bella's bed with her, not Jill specifically. It's a big deal for Bella.
- Oct 14, 2020
- 1,983
- 3,248
Actually that's not true. Have you ever heard of the civil right's act? If you own a business you can't just say that you don't want to serve certain people, or you can't say you won't hire certain people. And if you want to fire any of your employee's you better have a good, legal reason.
Also, that's not how the First Amendment works. Are you sure you are an American? Because you don't seem to understand this at all.
- Apr 14, 2021
- 1,107
- 3,236
Bella doesn't take Jill's dates seriously cuz she knows Jill doesn't take it serious. Its gonna be a big drama in future if MC pursue Jill but for seventh episode Bella is ok with Jill (but only Jil)
- Sep 27, 2020
- 1,838
- 5,542
Yes, her diary is a clear set up for something really big. If it wasn't it would've been finished in the episode it was introduced.
That's when the idea came in my head. Reading the diary.
Plus something about Neil, I don't trust him.
- Oct 14, 2020
- 1,983
- 3,248
That's a very simplistic interpretation of the law. For one thing, although men and women are indeed supposed to be equal it's also true that it can be extremely difficult to build a sexual harassment case against a woman. In divorce law women almost always are given preference in child custody.
Finally I was asking the poster about his particular experience in that field.
- Feb 2, 2021
- 1,922
- 3,787
Heee no !! this scene happens when you live at Bella's ( after the problem with Josy and Maya) and after you drove Cathy back home, you stay at Bella's with Jill.
You sleep on the couch and Bella and Jill are in Bella's bedroom and have some kind of weird discussion in the bed or fight about something that happened once and should not happen anymore, then Jill gets out and goes back to the couch to sleep close to you.
- Sep 20, 2018
- 3,195
- 13,326
Here's the timeline as I see it:
- Saturday night, Week 2: MC drives Cathy home, fools around with her but leaves her panties in the car.
- Tuesday afternoon, Week 3: Bella helps MC clean his room at the DIK Mansion. (No mention of panties)
- Tuesday, Week 4: MC works at the library with Bella, resulting in the LiBrian scene (No mention of panties, but Bella acts differently depending on the panty scene).
- Saturday, Week 4: MC and Bella play tennis with Jill and Tybalt. Bella will finally mention the panties.
So to make sense with the events we see, Bella would have had to overlook the panties for the first three-ish days, then find them within the next 6. That's seems plausible to me.
I did think it was odd Cathy insisted on taking her panties off when the MC didn't do much to her. Now we know why.Also goddammit Cathy Why did you take off your panties for a blowjob!?!
View attachment 1208936
I mean I know that she’s sexually frustrated but its basic manners not to leave your underwear in someone else car! She could also have called Bella and tell her that she forgot something in her car and picked it up discreetly. But that's the game I guess
This is why get nervous when Maya keeps saying she deleted the video of her threesome.
No, creating a blanket rule and applying it to everyone is precisely how the school would defend itself from accusations of bias against a "protected classes." They need only argue that allowing any students and teachers (male or female) to have sexual relations creates obvious conflicts of interest and thus it is reasonable to forbid them entirely. vogelbeest already gave you a link to Yale's policy, and you can find similar ones with minimal effort.
Obviously B&R would need to have an actual policy to that effect to fire someone for violating it. But there's no reason they couldn't, and based on both Cathy's and Jade's comments, it seems likely they do. If you think it would be easy for Cathy to successfully sue B&R for such a firing, I invite you to find court decisions in favor of a teacher in similar circumstances.
Before you repeat that it's a school policy and not a law, so what? Being fired is generally regarded as a fairly serious consequence. The fact that a teacher wouldn't also do jail time is simply failing to add further harm.
Also, I think your understanding of civil rights is backwards. Protected classes were created by statute, not the Bill of Rights. Someone who sues an employer for discrimination is actually counting on the government to restrict the freedom of association of the company that fired them. One possible defense against such a suit is to argue that the legislature in question had no authority to pass such a statute in the first place. Something similar happened to large portions of the voting rights act a few years ago (though obviously that did not start with a matter of employment).
- Sep 3, 2017
- 228
- 438