*Tlaero it ends in an oExactly what you expect from Tlaera's writing. Another masterpiece.
There are quite a few good games out there as of late, but Mortze and Tlaera... it's a real pleasure to sit back and actually enjoy their work.
Thank you! Seriously...
.
wth this game was actually enjoyable, the story was gold like always and well connected to the previous stories and characters in Elsaverse also other games use that and i like it , for example Power Vacuum uses that when you fail a decision , you see the bad ending and it goes back to the decision and never saw anyone complaining about that. Also Tlaero and Mortze games are in no way games where you have a bad choice and game ends like that or you get screwed over that , they are telling you a story like reading a book or a comic book you read and watch the story unfold and the story connects well with their previous stories and characters. They are pretty linear but so good to read its more of a kinetic novel ( i think that is the name right?!) . You have one MC and one main love interest and you follow their story. Your comment makes it seem like you never played their games
I've played all the other 4 games. I have zero memory of them having such an atrociously awful approach(pick something now loop back until you pick the other choice)
Except Saving Chloe, the other games had a scoring system that lead to several game overs if you didn't choose the right path. So it's not really such a big difference, here we just go back to the start of the scene instead of going back to the start of the game
Care to elaborate on that? A game over is a game over, you fucked it up, bye, you need to start over again. Here you fail, ok, just go back to the last save point. How is this massively worst?
There will eventually be an Omnibus Vol 2 that includes Elsa's Nightmares, Elsaverse: Transitions, Chasing Beth, and some number of future games. We can't really add this to the first Omnibus because the aspect ratio of the games changed and Renpy doesn't handle different aspect ratios very well.
I've just gone back to replay finding Miranda and i'm well in and have made many choices without being forced into a gameover/endless loop of being told as a player my choices are worthless. The 'Chasing Amy' approach might as well not even bother with having choices present as they only serve to royally annoy the player by forcing them into these horrible loops. Peronslly just made me want to disengage completely from the story unlike the previous endtries. Might as well go fully kinetic hog if they don't want to even the slightest freedom in the player choice imo.
In pretty much every game ever made, there is a mechanism where when you do the wrong thing, you fail. Sometimes when that happens you get a "game over" and you have to load your own save game. Sometimes when that happens it automatically loads your most recent checkpoint. And, sometimes when that happens, the game gives you a hint as to what you're doing wrong before you restore.
Finding Miranda tried something different where you couldn't fail, but if you didn't do it right, you didn't get to see the sex scene. I was vilified for that...
Honestly, I think you'll be vilified by someone for any decision you make. It's quite tedious, but please don't take it to heart.
Three, actually. Serena is a character that demanded I give her more screen time. I originally planned a small amount of content for her in SC, but then I saw the model that Mortze made and I ... had ... to give her more. I've wanted to come back to her for a while.
I really don't see the value of having the choices at all if you have that strict a view of what is right. That just gets my back up(i'd prefer to miss a sex scene) than feel like your say over the character is pointless. I enjoyed the prior entries as there was enough illusion of choice/choice and if i enjoyed the story i would try and elements i missed. If this the direction you're customers want then fair enough but don't think i'll play future ones.
